Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
Preview Benefits and Word Segmentations When Reading Chinese
LIU Zhifang;YAN Guoli;ZHANG Zhijun;PAN Yun;YANG Guifang
(1 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China) (2 College of Teacher Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) (3 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China) (4 Department of Psychology, GuiZhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China)
Download: PDF(371 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Recently, a number of studies have confirmed that Chinese readers could obtain linguistic information from word n+1 when it was in parafoveal vision. However, there was no confirmation that Chinese readers could obtain preview benefits from word n+2 (Yan, et. al., 2009; Yang, et. al., 2009; Yen, et. al., 2009; Rayner, et. al., 2003). The preview benefit effects received in a boundary paradigm could not exclude the effects of word segmentation. Therefore, there is no evidence that Chinese readers process the meaning of word n+1 by the word unit. Two experiments were conducted using a new eye-movement contingent display technology to clarify the confusion in the present study. The Chinese sentences used in both experiments consisted of 7 to 10 two-character words. There were four treatments of Chinese sentences in Experiment 1. Namely, as the nth word was fixated, (1) the words located to the right were all masked by a series of “※””, (2) the words located to the right of the n+1th word were all masked by a series of “※””, (3) only the n+1th word was masked by two masks of “※””, or (4) no words were masked as a baseline comparison (the control). Among the treatments, the first and third provided the cues of word n segmentation, and the second treatment provided information of word n+1 segmentation. Moreover, the first treatment was deprived of the preview benefit effects from word n+1 and n+2, the second treatment was deprived of the preview benefit effects from word n+2, and the third treatment was deprived of the preview benefit effects from n+1. An eye-movement apparatus was used, and eye-motion indices were measured. The effects on the total reading time, mean fixation duration, mean gaze duration, probability of refixation and word skipping were significant (p<0.05). The differences among the second and third treatments and the control for these indices showed significant preview effects on word n+1 and n+2. The mean gaze duration in the second treatment was observed to be less than the control, although the total reading time increased. However, we cannot exclude the effect of the mask paradigm itself, which influenced the patterns of eye movements and affected the results of Experiment 1. Therefore, a second experiment was conducted. Experiment 2 adopted similar treatments as Experiment 1, but the two adjacent characters that did not belong to a word were masked together. The manipulations did not provide cues to facilitate word segmentation. Consequently, all the masked treatments in Experiment 2 influenced the total reading and fixation times more significantly than those in Experiment 1. The mean gaze duration in the second treatment was greater than the control, which was an opposite result to that of Experiment 1. The patterns of eye movements in Experiment 2 differed from those in Experiment 1. Thus, the results obtained in Experiment 1 were not because of the influence of the mask paradigm. Because the second treatment in Experiment 1 emphasized the boundary of word n+1, the differences in the eye movement patterns between this condition and the control revealed that the beneficial effects from the text in word n+1 were based on the word unit. Thus, the data from the current experiment better fit with the theoretical assumptions of parallel processing models in reading.
Keywords Chinese reading      preview benefits      eye movement      word segmentations     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Zhijun   
Issue Date: 25 June 2013
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LIU Zhifang
YAN Guoli
ZHANG Zhijun
YANG Guifang
Cite this article:   
LIU Zhifang,YAN Guoli,ZHANG Zhijun, et al. Preview Benefits and Word Segmentations When Reading Chinese[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00614
URL:     OR
[1] BAI Xuejun; GAO Xiaolei; GAO Lei; WANG Yongsheng. An eye movement study on the perceptual span in reading Tibetan language[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 569-576.
[2] LIANG Feifei; WANG Yongsheng; YANG Wen; BAI Xuejun. The modulation of reading level on the development of children’s eye movement characteristics: Evidence from 9- to 11-year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 450-459.
[3] LIU Zhifang; ZHANG Zhijun; YANG Guifang. Test the activation model of transforming characters to words in Chinese reading: Evidence from delay word-boundary effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1082-1092.
[4] SU Heng; LIU Zhifang; CAO Liren. The effects of word frequency and word predictability in preview and their implications for word segmentation in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 625-636.
[5] WANG Fuxing; HOU Xiujuan; DUAN Zhaohui; LIU Huashan; LI Hui. The perceptual differences between experienced Chinese chess players and novices: Evidence from eye movement[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 457-471.
[6] WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; YAN Zhiqiang; DUAN Zhaohui; LI Hui. Children’s Attention Detection to Snakes: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 774-786.
[7] YAN Guoli; LIU Nina; LIANG Feifei; LIU Zhifang; BAI Xuejun. The Comparison of Eye Movements between Chinese Children and Adults When Reading Disappearing Text[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 300-318.
[8] WANG Fuxing; DUAN Zhaohui; ZHOU Zongkui; CHEN Jun. The Spatial Contiguity Effect in Multimedia Learning: The Role of Cueing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 224-233.
[9] CHEN Shuang; CHEN Lijing; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Role of Discourse Context on Semantic Integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 167-175.
[10] CHEN Jiebin; LU Zhongyi. The Effect of Route-angularity on Spatial Situation Model Constructing in Text[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 176-189.
[11] BAI Xuejun; WANG Yongsheng; GUO Zhiying; GAO Xiaolei; YAN Guoli. The Preview of Word N+2 Influences the High Frequency Word N+1 Processing in Chinese Reading[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 143-156.
[12] XU Jianping; CHEN Jiyue; ZHANG Wei; LI Wenya; SHENG Yu. Faking in Job Applicants' Responses in Personality Tests: #br# Evidence from A Eye-Tracking Study of Job Desirability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1395-1404.
[13] WANG Haibin; LU Jiamei; YAO Benxian; SANG Qingsong; CHEN Ning; TANG Xiaochen. The Impact of Pre-Service Teachers' Emotional Complexity on Facial Expression Processing: Evidences from Behavioral, ERP and Eye-Movement Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 50-65.
[14] CHI Hui;YAN Guoli;XU Xiaolu;XIA Ying;CUI Lei;BAI Xuejun. The Effect of Phonetic Radicals on Identification of Chinese Phonograms: Evidence from Eye Movement[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1242-1260.
[15] FAN Qian;SUI Xue;FU Yongchuan. An Eye-tracking Research on Featural, Configural and Holistic Processing Strategies in Face Perception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1062-1071.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech