Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
|
The Influence of Leader on Group Member’s Cooperation in Common Resource Dilemmas
ZHANG Zheming;JIN Shenghua;WU Song;ZHOU Xiang
(1School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) (2Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) (3AVIC International Trade & Economic Development Ltd. Beijing 100101, China) (4 PICC Life Insurance Company Limited, Beijing 100037, China)
Download: PDF(316 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  In past leadership research using common resource dilemmas, most researchers have studied the behavior of participants who identified as the leader. Individuals labeled “leaders” tended to harvest more common resources and impede the implementation of the public interest (De Cremer, 2003; De Cremer & Van Dijk, 2005; Van Dijk & De Cremer, 2006). Less is known, however, about the effects of establishing a leader on the behavior of the participants. If the betrayal of the leader could stimulate the self-restraint behavior of the group members, then the establishing a leader might promote the realization of the public interest. Three experiments were used to examine the impact of a leader’s behavior on the group member’s decision making. Experiments 1 manipulated the presence or absence of a leader and tested how the different behavior of a leader or common group member would influence the group member’s decision. Participants showed more self-restraint behavior when a leader showed the betrayal than when a common group member showed the betrayal. The participants also found the leader’s betrayal fairer, and regarded the leader as out-group member. Experiment 1 didn’t find the explanatory differences between Equity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Experiment 2 was conducted to evaluate the group member’s reaction to appointed and elected leaders. Participants showed more self-restraint behavior when an appointed leader showed the betrayal than when an elected leader did so. The participants also found the betrayal of the elected leader fairer, and regarded the appointed leader as out-group member. Experiment 2 confirmed the explanatory power of Social Identity Theory. Experiment 3 tested the impact of the betrayal of the in-group and out-group elected leader to the group member, in order to examine the Social Identity Theory. Participants showed more self-restraint behavior when out-group elected leader showed the betrayal. In contrast, when the in-group elected leader showed the betrayal, participants did not show self-restraint behavior. The results from all three experiments supported the hypotheses and suggested implications for organization management. Elected leaders should display justice and try to avoid the pursuit of personal interest. Leaders also should keep distance from their subordinates in some circumstances. Future research on leadership using the social dilemmas could evaluate the effects of personal variables.
Keywords common resource dilemmas      leader      elected      appointed     
Corresponding Authors: JIN Shenghua   
Issue Date: 25 April 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Zheming
JIN Shenghua
WU Song
ZHOU Xiang
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Zheming,JIN Shenghua,WU Song, et al. The Influence of Leader on Group Member’s Cooperation in Common Resource Dilemmas[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00453
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00453     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2013/V45/I4/453
[1] XU Shiyong; ZHU Jinqiang. Ethical leadership and pro-social rule breaking: A dual process model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 106-115.
[2] CHEN Leni; WANG Zhen; LUO Ben Nanfeng; LUO Zhengxue. Leader-subordinate extraversion fit and subordinate work engagement: Based on dominance complementarity theory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 710-721.
[3] LU Xinxin; SUN Jiaqing. When leader-member exchange increases emotional exhaustion? The role of belief in reciprocity and power distance orientation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.
[4] RONG Yan; SUI Yang; YANG Baiyin. The Effect of Leader Emotional Intelligence on Group Performance and #br# Employee Attitude: Mediating Effect of Justice Climate and Moderating Effect of Group Power Distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1152-1161.
[5] KONG Ming, QIAN Xiaojun. Mr. Right & Superman: Effect of Implicit Followership on Employee’s Behaviors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1162-1171.
[6] LI Ye; ZHANG Wenhui; LONG Lirong. How Self-sacrificial Leadership Influences Subordinates’ Work Performance: The Mediating Roles of Strategic Orientation and Supervisor Identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 653-662.
[7] LI Rui; TIAN Xiaoming; LIU Shishun. Does Benevolent Leadership Increase Employee Pro-Social Rule Breaking?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 637-652.
[8] TIAN Xiaoming; LI Rui. Can Self-Sacrificial Leadership Promote Employee Proactive Behavior? The Mediating Effect of Felt Obligation and Its Boundary Conditions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(12): 1472-1485.
[9] HAO Po; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. When and Why Shared Leadership Influences Team Outputs? The Pivotal Roles of Information Exchange, Passionate Tone and Environmental Uncertainty[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1288-1299.
[10] TU Yidong; LU Xinxin; GUO Wei; WANG Zhen. What Benefits Do Ethical Leaders Gain? Ethical Leadership, LMX Mean and Leaders’ Benefits[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[11] REN Zhen; YANG Anbo; WANG Dengfeng; LIN Ying. Structure Models of Leader-Member Relationship (LMR) from the Perspectives of Cultural Differences between China and the West[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1355-1377.
[12] LIANG Jian. Ethical Leadership and Employee Voice: Examining a Moderated-Mediation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 252-264.
[13] ZHANG Yong; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. The Effect of Pay for Performance on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1880-1896.
[14] LI Rui; TIAN Xiaoming. Supervisor Authoritarian Leadership and Subordinate Proactive Behavior: Test of A Mediated-Moderation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1719-1733.
[15] YAO Ruosong;ZHAO Baonan;LIU Ze;MIAO Qunying. The Application of Many-Facet Rasch Model in Leaderless Group Discussion[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(9): 1039-1049.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech