Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2013, Vol. 45 Issue (3) : 363-376     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00363
The Impact of Pay for Performance on Employees’ Creativity: Moderating Effect of Person-job Fit and Mediating Effect of Creative Self-efficacy
ZHANG Yong;LONG Lirong
(School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China)
Download: PDF(501 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Over the past three decades, a debate has being burgeoning in academic circles over the effects of extrinsic rewards on the likelihood of generating creativity. The learning theoretical approach has suggested that promised reward may bolster creativity by establishing a contingency between novel behavior and reinforcement. This view has been supported by a variety of studies, in which rewards offered for high performance have indeed increased creativity. However, a competing humanist approach has made the very opposite prediction, asserting that promised reward should undermine creativity by reducing perceived autonomy and thereby undermining the intrinsic motivation posited to drive creativity. It has also been proposed within this camp that promised rewards reduce creativity by drawing attention toward the rewards rather than the creative process. In previous studies, the relationship between pay for performance (PFP) intensity and creativity is inconclusive. In this study, we propose a process model based on social cognitive theory to explain how and when PFP affect individual creativity. Based on the cognitive evaluation theory and the learned industriousness theory, it is hypothesized that there is an inverted U shape relationship between PFP and creativity, and the impact of PFP on creativity is mediated by creative self-efficacy based on the social cognitive theory. Additionally, taking an interactional perspective, it is proposed that the interaction between PFP and person-job fit would be significant such that for those employees rating high on person-job fit, the positive effect of intermediate level of PFP on creativity would be stronger and the negative effect of high level of PFP on creativity would be weaker, and this interaction will also be mediated by employees’ creative self-efficacy. Data were collected from 296 dyads of employees and their immediate supervisors in 44 enterprises. The questionnaire for employee included PFP, creative self-efficacy, and person-job fit. Employees’ creativity and job complexity was rated by their immediate supervisors. Theoretical hypotheses were tested by hierarchal regression analysis. Results of analyzing the matched sample showed that PFP had unique reversed U shape indirect effects on employee creativity via creative self-efficacy. Further, moderated path analysis revealed person-job fit augmented intermediate PFP’s direct positive effect on creative self-efficacy and indirect positive effect on creativity, and attenuated high PFP’s direct negative effect on creative self-efficacy and indirect negative effect on creativity. In contrast to previous studies, the research demonstrated that employees would achieve highest creativity at intermediate level of PFP, this result clarified the relationship between objective incentive intensity and employees’ creativity in workplace. Second, by examining the mediating effect of creative self-efficacy, the results contributed to our understanding on the mechanism through which PFP influence creativity. Finally, through investigating the moderating effect of person-job fit, we confirmed it as an important bounded condition of the effect of PFP on employees’ creativity.
Keywords creativity      pay for performance      person-job fit      creative self-efficacy     
Corresponding Authors: LONG Lirong   
Issue Date: 20 March 2013
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yong;LONG Lirong. The Impact of Pay for Performance on Employees’ Creativity: Moderating Effect of Person-job Fit and Mediating Effect of Creative Self-efficacy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2013, 45(3): 363-376.
URL:     OR
[1] HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668.
[2] LUO Ping,SHI Junqi,ZHU Yanni,FANG Yanran. The influence of idiosyncratic deals on employee proactive career behavior and creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 81-92.
[3] WEI Lihua,LIU Zhiqiang,LIAO Shudi,LONG Lirong,LIAO Jianqiao. Collective psychological ownership, status conferral criteria and team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 677-687.
[4] SHEN Yimo,MA Chenlu,BAI Xinwen,ZHU Yanhan,LU Yunlin,ZHANG Qinglin,LIU Jun. Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity: The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 238-247.
[5] Weiguo LIU, Yanran FANG, Junqi SHI, Shenjiang MO. The impact of supervisor’s creativity expectation on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 667-677.
[6] ZHANG Yong, LIU Haiquan, WANG Mingxuan, QING Ping.  The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 450-461.
[7] YANG Wenjing, JIN Yule, QIU Jiang, ZHANG Qinglin.  The effect of prototype difficulty and semantic similarity on the prototype activation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 260-269.
[8] ZHU Yu, LYU Yang, WANG Yanfei, WANG Lixuan.  Coaching leadership effect on employees' creativity: Multilevel moderated mediator analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 327-336.
[9] Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168.
[10] LIU Min, ZHANG Qinlin, YU Wei, ZHANG Hua.  Preliminary study on creative thinking mechanism of market information integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 82-90.
[11] NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[12] LI WenFu; TONG DanDan; QIU Jiang; ZHANG QingLin. The neural basis of scientific innovation problems solving[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 331-342.
[13] ZHANG Jinghuan; LIU Xin; REN Feifei; SUN Xiangwei; YU Qi. The effects of group diversity and organizational support on group creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1551-1560.
[14] GU Chuanhua; WANG Yali; WU Caifu; XIE Xianglong; CUI Chengzhu; WANG Yaxian; WANG Wanzhen; HU Biying; ZHOU Zongkui. Brain Correlates underlying Social Creative Thinking: EEG Alpha Activity in Trait vs. State Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 765-773.
[15] LV Jie; ZHANG Gang. The Mechanisms of Knowledge Heterogeneity on Creativity of Knowledge Teams: An Interactive Cognition Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 533-544.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech