Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2012, Vol. 44 Issue (12) : 1677-1686     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01677
Abusive Supervision and Employee’ Performance: Mechanisms of FSB and Learning Goral Orientation
SHEN Chuan-Gang;MA Hong-Yu;YANG Jing;LIU Teng-Fei
(1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, and Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory, Wuhan 430079, China) (3 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (4 Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China)
Download: PDF(432 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The literature on abusive supervision has consistently demonstrated the negative relationship between member perception of supervisor's abusive behavior and member performance. The process through which relationship supervisor's abusive behavior influences subordinates’ performance, however, is still not fully understood. The present study provides a mechanism for the process. Specifically, we predict that the feedback seeking behavior (FSB) of members mediates these relationships, and learning goal orientation moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and FSB. In order to avoid the common method variance problem, two sources of survey were administrated. Data was from a total of 306 matched supervisor-subordinate dyads in 7 enterprises located in Hubei, Zhejiang, Xiamen. Two structured questionnaires were employed as the research instrument for this study. One consisted of three scales designed to measure abusive supervision, FSB and learning goal orientation. Among the major measures, the 15-items abusive supervision was adopted from Tepper (2000); FSB was measured via 6 items that was adopted from Saori Yanagizawa (2008); the five item learning goal orientation scale was adopted from Vandewalle & Cummings (1997). We used a scale adopted from Tusi et al. (1997) in the other questionnaire to measure supervisor-rated subordinates’ performance. Results show that the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for these above measures range from 0.75 to 0.94. Hierarchical regression and the total effect moderation model were utilized to examine the proposed hypotheses. In line with predictions, results of hierarchical regression demonstrate that abusive supervision is negatively related to FSB, supervisor-rated performance, and FSB partially mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and supervisor-rated performance. Specifically, the negative effect of abusive supervision on subordinates’ performance was partially mediated by subordinates’ FSB. In addition, results of total effect moderation model analysis reveal that subordinates’ learning goal orientation moderate the relationship between abusive supervision and FSB. Abusive supervision was more strongly related to FSB when subordinates’ learning goal orientation was low. The present study extends our understanding of social exchange between supervisor and subordinate in the link between abusive supervision and subordinate’s performance. Finally, the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings, limitations and future research directions were also discussed.
Keywords abusive supervision      performance      feedback seeking behavior      learning goal orientation     
Corresponding Authors: MA Hong-Yu   
Issue Date: 25 December 2012
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
SHEN Chuan-Gang
MA Hong-Yu
LIU Teng-Fei
Cite this article:   
SHEN Chuan-Gang,MA Hong-Yu,YANG Jing, et al. Abusive Supervision and Employee’ Performance: Mechanisms of FSB and Learning Goral Orientation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(12): 1677-1686.
URL:     OR
[1] SUN Jianmin, CHEN Leni, YIN Kui.  When challenge stressors increase employee innovative behaviors? The role of leader member exchange and abusive supervision[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 436-449.
[2] HU Qiongjing, LU Xi, ZHANG Zhixue. Self-monitoring in group context: Its indirect benefits for individual status attainment and group task performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1169-1179.
[3] LIU Chao, LIU Jun, ZHU Li, WU Shouqiang.  The causes of abusive supervision from the perspective of rule-adaptation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 966-979.
[4] CHEN Qing; HE Quan; CHEN Guangyao; GUO Yuezhi; ZHANG Hejing; HE Xianyou. The perspective-distance effect hypothesis: Different perspectives and thinking modes lead to different decision-making performance in complex condition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 383-392.
[5] TU Xingyong; ZHANG Qi; WANG Zeyin; HE Xin. Trust climate, perceived insider status and employee’ in-role performance: A mediated moderator model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 83-93.
[6] CHEN Mo; LIANG Jian. High performance expectation and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Social cognitive perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 94-105.
[7] PENG Jian; WANG Xiao. I will perform effectively if you are with me: Leader-follower congruence in followership prototype, job engagement and job performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1151-1162.
[8] CHEN Shuai.
The influence of team faultlines on team performance: Mediating effect of team transactive memory system
[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 84-94.
[9] WEI Xuhua; LIU Yongmei; CHEN Sixuan. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Team Demographic Diversity and Team Performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1172-1187.
[10] LI Ye; ZHANG Wenhui; LONG Lirong. How Self-sacrificial Leadership Influences Subordinates’ Work Performance: The Mediating Roles of Strategic Orientation and Supervisor Identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 653-662.
[11] MA Jun; ZHANG Haomin; YANG Tao. A Cross-level Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientation and Performance Control on Team Member’s Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 79-92.
[12] YAN Bihua; JI Ming; ZHAO Xiaojun; TU Jinlu; YOU Xuqun. Predictive Effect of Implicit Safety Attitudes on Safety Performance in Aviation Safety Culture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 119-128.
[13] TU Yidong; LU Xinxin; GUO Wei; WANG Zhen. What Benefits Do Ethical Leaders Gain? Ethical Leadership, LMX Mean and Leaders’ Benefits[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[14] GAO Zhonghua;ZHAO Chen. Does Organizational Politics at the Workplace Harm Employees’ Job Performance? A Person-Organization Fit Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1124-1143.
[15] LIU Songbo;LI Yuhui. A Longitudinal Study on the Impact Mechanism of Employees’ Boundary Spanning Behavior: Roles of Centrality and Collectivism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(6): 852-863.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech