Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2012, Vol. 44 Issue (12) : 1618-1627     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01618
|
ERP Time Course of Understanding Private versus Communicative Intentions
WANG Yi-Wen;HUANG Liang;XU Sheng;YUAN Bo;XU Yan-Jiao;LI Hong-Yu
(Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
Download: PDF(517 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Theory of mind (ToM) refers to understanding other's mental states, such as beliefs, intentions, emotions, and thoughts, to predict other's behaviors. ToM gradually became one of the areas of much interest among developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The concept of attribution of intentions to others is a central element of ToM. In the daily life, we not only need to understand the private intention of a single person, but also have to understand the communicative intention among two or multiple persons. Understanding the communicative intention is more complex than understanding the private intention. In the current study, the event related potentials (ERPs) technology was employed to explore the dissociative electrophysiological correlates for understanding private versus communicative intention while the subjects observing three types of comic strips: 1) private intention; 2) communicative intention; 3) physical intention. We report the ERP study to investigate the time course of understanding the private intention and understanding the communicative intention. Electrophysiological results showed a significantly larger amplitude peak of N250 over the parietal sites for private intention compared to communicative and physical intentions in the 200-300 ms epoch. At a later stage (i.e., from 300-600 ms), the mean amplitudes of the late positive component (LPC) for communicative intention were more positive than those for the private and physical intentions. Furthermore, the mean amplitudes of the LPC were also significantly larger for private intention compared to the physical intention from 400-600 ms. Our data provide a direct comparison between the electrophysiological correlates for understanding the private intention as well as understanding the communicative intention. Our findings show that understanding the communicative intention overlaps the neural system capable of understanding private intention but requires the involvement of an additional system. Individuals are first able to understand a single person’s intention, and understanding the communicative intention builds on that earlier understanding by involving the same mental-state processing characteristic of understanding private intention plus an additional communicative intention processing system as well. We believe that understanding private intention and understanding the communicative intention are two different levels of ToM. Understanding the private intention is the basis for understanding the communicative intention and the level of understanding the communicative intention is higher than the level of understanding the private intention.
Keywords Theory of mind      private intention      communicative intention      social cognition      ERP     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Yi-Wen   
Issue Date: 25 December 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
WANG Yi-Wen;HUANG Liang;XU Sheng;YUAN Bo;XU Yan-Jiao;LI Hong-Yu. ERP Time Course of Understanding Private versus Communicative Intentions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2012, 44(12): 1618-1627.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01618     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2012/V44/I12/1618
[1] LI Jin, SUN Yu, YANG Zilu, ZHONG Yiping. Social value orientation modulates the processing of social rewards for self: Evidence from ERPs study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 786-800.
[2] Xiong LI,Zuoshan LI,Binyang XIANG,Jing MENG. Empathy for pain in Individuals with autistic traits influenced by attention cues: Evidence from an ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 294-306.
[3] Zhiling ZHENG,Pengfei WANG,Dequan SU,Weijie GUO,Nan SUN,Yankun MA,Hong ZENG. Differences in brain reactivity in relation to different types of drug-associated cues and disinhibition among heroin addicts: An ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 317-328.
[4] Chen CHEN,Xin ZHANG,Liping SUN,Xin QIN,Huiru DENG. Trust is valued in proportion to its rarity? Investigating how and when feeling trusted leads to counterproductive work behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 329-344.
[5] NI Cong,ZHU Xu,JIANG Guangrong,LIN Xiubin,YU Lixia,LIANG Huanping. Interpersonal complementarity in counseling and its relationship with working alliance and therapeutic outcomes[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 197-206.
[6] ZHANG Ruqian,LIU Jieqiong,LI Xianchun. Neural mechanisms of fairness formation in the perspective of social interactions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1007-1017.
[7] HUANG Liang,YANG Xue,HUANG Zhihua,WANG Yiwen. Brain spatio-temporal dynamics of understanding kind versus hostile intentions based on dyadic body movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 557-570.
[8] ZHANG Wenpei, SHEN Qunlun, SONG Jintao, ZHOU Renlai. Classification of test-anxious individuals using Event-Related Potentials (ERPs): The effectiveness of machine learning algorithms[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(10): 1116-1127.
[9] Dongjie XIE, Hao LU, Yanjie SU. Pay-forward effect of resource allocation in preschoolers: Role of theory of mind and empathy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1018-1028.
[10] WANG Lili, FENG Wenfeng, JIA Lina, ZHU Xiangru, LUO Wenbo, YANG Suyong, LUO Yue-jia. Emotional processing of winning and losing facial expression and body posture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(8): 892-906.
[11] YANG Qingqing, HU Na, CHEN Xu, NIU Juan, ZHAI Jing.  Electrophysiological evidences of different emotional regulation strategies between the avoidant and the secure attachment individuals in the context of lovers, intimacy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 306-316.
[12] TAO Aihua, LIU Yonghe, WANG Pei.  Moderating effects of conflict types on disappointment in interpersonal conflict[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 235-242.
[13] NIE Chunyan, WANG Tao, ZHAO Peng, CUI Nan. The influence of interpretation frame on the evaluation of culturally mixed products: The moderating effect of comparison focus and interpretation strategy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1438-1448.
[14] HAN Meng, MAO Xinrui, CAI Mengtong, JIA Xi, GUO Chunyan.  The effect of positive and negative signs on the SNARC effect in the magnitude judgment task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 995-1008.
[15] FU Yilei, LUO Yuejia, CUI Fang.  Consistency of choice modulates outcome evaluation: Evidence from ERP studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech