Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2012, Vol. 44 Issue (11) : 1547-1553     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01547
|
A New Multiple-Strategies Cognitive Diagnosis Model: the MSCD Method
TU Dong-Bo;CAI Yan;DAI Hai-Qi;DING Shu-Liang
(Psychology College of Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330027, China)
Download: PDF(266 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Almost all of the current cognitive diagnosis models allow for single-strategy of problem solving, and assume all examinees use the same processing strategy. Based on the extant studies, the current study developed a new multiple-strategies cognitive diagnosis model, called MSCD method. Monte Carlo method was employed here to explore the feasibility of the MSCD method and to examine the estimation precision as well as the properties of the MSCD method. The findings were presented: (1) Under the single-strategy tests or data, the average attribute match ration (AAMR), pattern match ration (PMR) and strategy match ration (SMR) of the MSCD method were as high as those of single-strategy cognitive diagnosis model (single-strategy model). (2) Under multiple-strategy tests or data, the MSCD method also had high AAMR, PMR and SMR, but single-strategy model did not. (3) When the number of strategy reaching 5, the MSCD method also had very high AAMR, PMR and SMR. All in all, the new developing model, the MSCD method, was reasonable and could be accepted.
Keywords cognitive diagnosis      multiple-strategies cognitive diagnosis model      processing strategy      Q-matrix     
Corresponding Authors: TU Dong-Bo   
Issue Date: 01 November 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
TU Dong-Bo
CAI Yan
DAI Hai-Qi
DING Shu-Liang
Cite this article:   
TU Dong-Bo,CAI Yan,DAI Hai-Qi, et al. A New Multiple-Strategies Cognitive Diagnosis Model: the MSCD Method[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(11): 1547-1553.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01547     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2012/V44/I11/1547
[1] LIU Yanlou; XIN Tao; LI Lingqing; TIAN Wei; LIU Xiaoxiao. An improved method for differential item functioning detection in cognitive diagnosis models: An application of Wald statistic based on observed information matrix[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 588-598.
[2] ZHAN Peida; BIAN Yufang; WANG Lijun. Factors affecting the classification accuracy of reparametrized diagnostic classification models for expert-defined polytomous attributes[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 318-330.
[3] ZHAN Peida; CHEN Ping; BIAN Yufang. Using confirmatory compensatory multidimensional IRT models to do cognitive diagnosis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1347-1356.
[4] CAI Yan; MIAO Ying; TU Dongbo. The polytomously scored cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1338-1346.
[5] KANG Chunhua; REN Ping; ZENG Pingfei. Nonparametric Cognitive Diagnosis: A Cluster Diagnostic Method  Based on Grade Response Items[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1077-1088.
[6] TANG Xiaojuan; DING Shuliang; YU Zonghuo. Application of Rough Set Theory in Item Cognitive Attribute Identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 950-962.
[7] ZHAN Peida; LI Xiaomin; WANG Wen-Chung; BIAN Yufang; WANG Lijun. The Multidimensional Testlet-Effect Cognitive Diagnostic Models[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 689-701.
[8] LUO Zhaosheng; LI Yujun; YU Xiaofeng; GAO Chunlei; PENG Yafeng. A Simple Cognitive Diagnosis Method Based on Q-Matrix Theory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 264-272.
[9] YU Xiaofeng; LUO Zhaosheng; QIN Chunying; GAO Chunlei; LI Yujun. Joint Estimation of Model Parameters and Q-Matrix Based on Response Data[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 273-282.
[10] CAI Yan; TU Dongbo. Extension of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Based on the Polytomous Attributes Framework and Their Q-matrices Designs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1300-1308.
[11] WANG Zhuoran; GUO Lei; BIAN Yufang. Comparison of DIF Detecting Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Test[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1923-1932.
[12] TU Dongbo;CAI Yan;DAI Haiqi. Comparison and Selection of Five Noncompensatory Cognitive Diagnosis Models Based on Attribute Hierarchy Structure[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 243-252.
[13] CAI Yan;TU Dongbo;DING Shuliang. A Simulation Study to Compare Five Cognitive Diagnostic Models[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1295-1304.
[14] TU Dong-Bo,CAI Yan,DAI Hai-Qi. A New Method of Q-matrix Validation Based on DINA Model[J]. , 2012, 44(4): 558-568.
[15] DING Shu-Liang;MAO Meng-Meng;WANG Wen-Yi;LUO Fen;CUI Ying. Evaluating the Consistency of Test Items Relative to the Cognitive Model for Educational Cognitive Diagnosis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(11): 1535-1546.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech