Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2012, Vol. 44 Issue (9) : 1265-1278     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01265
|
Self-Deception: Deceiving Yourself to Better Deceive Others
LU Hui-Jing
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Download: PDF(444 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Existing research has approached self-deception mainly as an intrapersonal process representing personality traits, motivational biases in information processing, and inconsistencies between explicit and implicit self-systems. Using an evolutionary approach, we treat self-deception as an interpersonal process whereby individuals deceive themselves to better deceive others. This approach advances two new theoretical developments in the understanding of self-deception. We propose that the probabilities of deception detection should affect the likelihood and activation of self-deception, and that a dual-retrieval memory system can be used to operationalize inter-personal self-deception. We first review the existing literature by highlighting three characteristics. First, self-deceptive individuals show contradictory responses between self-report and physiological or behavioral reaction, and these inconsistencies are motivated by the desire to maintain high self-esteem. Second, self-deception is driven by self-enhancing motivations in information processing that includes perceiving, evaluating, and retrieving information. Third, self-deception is also viewed as a personality attribute, representing individual differences in viewing oneself in an overly positive light. These studies also examine affective effects of self-deception and the correlations among emotion, cognition, motivation, and decision-making behaviors. We then present our evolutionary explanation of self-deception which we believe advances the development of this psychological construction and research both theoretically and methodologically. Theoretically, as proposed by the evolutionary biologist, Robert Trivers, self-deception is the result of the “arms race” between deception and deception detection. Because deception is prevalent in all animals including human beings, deception detection has evolved to prevent oneself from being deceived. Cues such as signs of nervousness may be leaked through changes in facial and eye muscle contraction, voice volume and pitch, and other observable physiological and bodily changes. The evolutionary adaptation to avoid these physiological cues of detection is self-deception that leaks out no cues for detection because the individual is unaware of the ongoing deception. Methodologically, we propose a way to test the evolutionary hypothesis about self-deception. Because self-deception evolves to better escape detection, it must respond to social conditions that register the probabilities of deception detection so that individuals should self-deceive when they sense high rather than low probabilities of detection. Social status, moral standing, and the mere number of the deceived, relative to that of the deceiver, represent the detection-registering conditions that should affect the likelihood and activation of self-deception. We also propose a dual-retrieval memory procedure to operationalize self-deception. In the first retrieval that takes place in front of the deceived, the deceiver fails to retrieve encoded information due to the motivation to deceive and to escape detection. In the second retrieval after successful deception has been achieved, the deceiver retrieves the true or full information to achieve fitness gains. The difference between the two retrievals in the self-serving direction proves self-deception.
Keywords self-deception      deception      evolutionary psychology     
Corresponding Authors: LU Hui-Jing   
Issue Date: 28 September 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LU Hui-Jing
Cite this article:   
LU Hui-Jing. Self-Deception: Deceiving Yourself to Better Deceive Others[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(9): 1265-1278.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01265     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2012/V44/I9/1265
[1] WANG Jiaying; CHEN Bin-Bin. The influence of childhood stress and mortality threat on mating standards[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 857-866.
[2] FAN Wei; ZHONG Yiping; LI Huiyun; MENG Chuyi; YOU Chang; FU Xiaolan. The influence of self-control in the perceived of deception and deception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 845-856.
[3] FU Xinyuan; LU Zhiyuan; KOU Yu. Effects of a Stranger’s Presence and Behavior on Moral Hypocrisy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1058-1066.
[4] LIU Xiao-Cen,SANG Biao,DOU Dong-Hui. Explicit and Implicit Self-Enhancement as Functions of Interpersonal Contexts[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1293-1307.
[5] JIANG Ke,XIONG Zhe-Hong. Different Contents Different Inductive Inference: Under the Conditions of Embrace-Advantage and Resist-Disadvantage[J]. , 2010, 42(11): 1050-1059.
[6] ZHANG Li-Jin,WU Nan,ZHENG Yan. The Training Effects of Different Linguistic Interference on Young Chinese Children’s Performance on A Theory of Mind Task[J]. , 2008, 40(07): 819-827.
[7] Xiao-Tian-Wang. Evolutionary Psychology of Investment Decisions: Expected Allocation of Personal Money and Differential Parental Investment in Sons and Daughters[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 406-414.
[8] Irwin-Silverman. Why Evolutionary Psychology?[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 541-545.
[9] Valerie-G.-Starratt,Todd-K.-Shackelford,Aaron-T.-Goetz,William-F.-McKibbin. Male Mate Retention Behaviors Vary with Risk of Partner Infidelity
and Sperm Competition
[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 523-527.
[10] David-M.-Buss. The Evolution of Human Mating[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 502-512.
[11] Lei-Chang. Some of the Whats, Whos, and Whens Related to Evolutionary Psychology[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 556-570.
[12] Shi-Bing,Su-Yanjie. Children’s Deceptive Behaviors And Related Social Characters[J]. , 2007, 39(01): 111-117.
[13] Ye Haosheng. Theoretical Thinking about The Limitations of Evolutionary Psychology[J]. , 2006, 38(05): 784-790.
[14] Kuang Zhihua,Ye Haosheng. A REVIEW OF THREE NEW APPROACHES IN WESTERN PSYCHOLOGY[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 702-709.
[15] Yue Guoan,Chen Hao,Zhang Yanyan. VERIFICATION OF EVOLUTIONARY HYPOTHESIS ON HUMAN MATE SELECTION MECHANISM IN CROSS-CULTURE CONTEXT[J]. , 2005, 37(04): 561-568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech