Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
权力状态对消费者边界偏好的影响
童璐琼
(北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院, 北京 100875)
The Influence of Power State on the Consumers’ Preference for Consumption Boundaries
TONG Luqiong
(Business School, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
全文: PDF(673 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

权力在生活中无处不在, 而消费者的权力状态对其消费行为也有着重要的影响。本研究通过一系列的实验, 探讨了消费者权力状态对边界偏好的影响。研究发现, 当消费者处于高权力状态时更喜欢有明确边界的产品或者物品(例如, 明确的产品包装, 物品和标识边框)。与此同时, 消费者权力状态对消费者边界偏好的影响来源于权力引发的控制需求。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
童璐琼
关键词 权力状态边界偏好控制需求    
Abstract

 

Different degrees of power exist in consumers’ everyday life. It can arise from structural factors (e.g., hierarchical roles), cognitive factors (e.g., episodic recall), and physical factors (e.g., physical position). Despite the long-recognized value and experimental investigation of power in social science, until recently, scholars start to pay attention to the influence of power state on consumer behavior. However, the current research paid special attention to the effect of power state on a common but novel aspect in consumer behavior – the preference for consumption boundaries (that is, visual borders that separate and contain a focal object).
Prior literature suggests that state of relatively high power fosters an agentic orientation, which tends to express dominant acts and increases the desire for control. Moreover, one way that people gain personal control is by seeking order and structure in their consumption environment and choices, for example, seeking boundaries in their consumption environment. Thus we argue that as relatively high (vs. low) power state fosters desire for control, consumers in high (vs. low) power state prefer objects that are bounded over those that are unbounded.
The author conducted three experiments to examine whether and how power states affect consumers’ preference for consumption boundaries. In Study 1A and 1B, we manipulated participants’ power state by asking them to recall a particular incident in which they had power over another individual or individuals (or in which some else had power over them), and then asked them to indicate their preferred option from bounded and unbounded pairs. The results illustrated that feeling powerful (vs. powerless) led the consumers to prefer options (e.g., product display, picture display and brand logo) that were bounded (vs. unbounded). In Study 2, we further manipulated participants’ power state by role playing task (boss vs. employee), and then measured their desire for control, mood, arousal, attentional overload, as well as their preference for boundaries. The findings proved that the desire for control (especially the desire for control of one’s own life) mediated the influence of power state on boundary preference, and ruled out mood, arousal as well as attentional overload as alternative explanations.

In summary, the results of three studies reported in the present research demonstrated that one way high−power (vs. low−power) individuals express power is by seeking structured consumption, in other words, consumption boundaries in various forms. The findings theoretically enrich and advance our understanding of the impact of power state on consumer behavior from a novel perspective, and provide further knowledge about the role of control in the influence of power. Given the findings of this research, marketers should be more aware of the match between consumers’ power state and consumption boundary settings.

Key wordspower state    preference for consumption boundaries    desire for control
收稿日期: 2015-01-28      出版日期: 2015-11-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金青年项目(71302024)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。

通讯作者: 童璐琼, E-mail: tonglq@bnu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
童璐琼. 权力状态对消费者边界偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01371.
TONG Luqiong. The Influence of Power State on the Consumers’ Preference for Consumption Boundaries. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1371-1378.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01371      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I11/1371
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn