暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：反刍思维与网络道德的作用 *

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01051

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨暴力环境接触、大学生网络攻击行为、反刍思维及网络道德之间的关系, 选取1000名大学生为被试, 采用暴力环境接触问卷、网络攻击行为量表、反刍思维问卷及网络道德问卷进行测试。结果表明: (1)暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为有显著的正向影响, 并间接地通过反刍思维对大学生网络攻击行为产生作用; (2)网络道德在暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响中起显著的调节作用, 具体而言, 在低网络道德水平下, 暴力环境接触能显著正向预测大学生网络攻击行为, 而在高网络道德水平下, 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的预测作用不显著。

关键词: 大学生, 暴力环境接触, 反刍思维, 网络道德, 网络攻击行为

Abstract:

With the development of science, the internet has become an indispensable tool in college students' study and daily life. However, online aggressive behavior has become a much more serious problem for college students in recent few years. It is necessary to find out which factors have significant effects on online aggressive behavior of college students. According to the previous researches, the violent exposure was found to be able to predict aggressive behavior significantly. In addition, some theorists also have confirmed that ruminative responses and aggressive behavior are strongly related. However, as a special form of aggressive behavior, there was little research focused on online aggressive behavior and violent exposure. So the purposes of the present study is to explore the relationship between violent exposure, ruminative responses, internet moral and online aggressive behavior as well as the mechanism the effect of violent exposure on online aggressive behavior of college students.
A total sample of 1000 college students from some universities was selected, with 326 males and 508 females, the average age was 20.74-year-old. All subjects were gathered in the class and finished the questionnaires within about 30 minutes. The questionnaires included the Violent Exposure Questionnaire (VEQ), Online Aggressive Behavior Scale (OABS), Ruminative Responses Scale (RSS), and the Internet Moral Questionnaire (IMQ). Data was collected and analyzed with SPSS 24.0, Amos 21.0 and Mplus 7.4, and the bias-corrected percentile Bootstrap method was used to analyze the role of ruminative responses and internet moral between violent exposure and college students' online aggressive behavior. A single factor analysis was calculated to test the common method variance. Results showed that the study was in-existent common method variance.
The results show that: (1)The relationships between each pair of violent exposure, ruminative responses, internet moral and online aggressive behavior are correlated significantly and positively, the correlation coefficient ranges 0.07 from 0.96 (p < 0.01); (2)The structural equation model (SEM) reveals that the data fits the theoretical model well (c ²/df = 2.45, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.03, RMSEA = 0.04). (3) Violent exposure has a significant direct effect on online aggressive behavior (β = 0.29, p < 0.01); Violent exposure has a significant direct effect on ruminative responses (β = 0.23, p < 0.01); Ruminative responses has a significant direct effect on online aggressive behavior (β = 0.17, p < 0.01); Internet moral has a significant direct effect on online aggressive behavior (β = -0.17, p < 0.01); Interaction has a significant direct effect on online aggressive behavior (β = -0.17, p < 0.01). (4)Violent exposure has a significant indirect effect on online aggressive behavior through ruminative responses, and the confidence interval of 95% is [0.025, 0.061]; (5) Internet moral moderates the relation between violent exposure and online aggressive behavior of college students, that is, there is a significant positive relation between violent exposure and online aggressive behavior under the low internet moral level, however, there is a non-significant relation between violent exposure and online aggressive behavior under the high internet moral level.
It is concluded that in the structural equation model of violent exposure on online aggressive behavior of college students, ruminative responses plays a partial mediating role and internet moral moderates the direct effect. These findings suggest some measures of prevention and treatment for college students’ online aggressive behavior should be taken. Schools and families should set up a good core self-evaluation system in order to help them improve their moral level and eradicate online aggressive behavior.

Key words: college students, violent exposure, ruminative responses, internet moral, online aggressive behavior

中图分类号:

金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. (2018). 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响：反刍思维与网络道德的作用 ^*. 心理学报, 50(9), 1051-1060.

JIN Tonglin, LU Guizhi, ZHANG Lu, WU Yuntena, JIN Xiangzhong. (2018). The effect of violent exposure on online aggressive behavior of college students: The role of ruminative responses and internet moral. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(9), 1051-1060.

图/表 4

参考文献 82

1	Bandura, A. ( 1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2	Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S. ( 2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42( 5), 685-697. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1 URL
3	Bradshaw C. P., Rodgers C. R. R., Ghandour L. A., & Garbarino J . ( 2009). Social-cognitive mediators of the association between community violence exposure and aggressive behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 24( 3), 199-210. doi: 10.1037/a0017362 URL
4	Brady S. S., Gorman-Smith D., Henry D. B., & Tolan P. H . ( 2008). Adaptive coping reduces the impact of community violence exposure on violent behavior among African American and Latino male adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36( 1), 105-115. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9164-x URL
5	Buckley, K. E., & Anderson, C. A . ( 2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp.363-378). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
6	Burgers, D. E., & Drabick, D. A. G . ( 2016). Community violence exposure and generalized anxiety symptoms: Does executive functioning serve a moderating role among low income, urban youth?. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44( 8), 1543-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0144-x URL
7	Butcher F., Galanek J. D., Kretschmar J. M., & Flannery D. J . ( 2015). The impact of neighborhood disorganization on neighborhood exposure to violence, trauma symptoms, and social relationships among at-risk youth. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 300-306.
8	Carnagey N. L., Anderson C. A., & Bushman B. J . ( 2007). The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43( 3), 489-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.003 URL
9	Chapin, J. ( 2016). Adolescents and cyber bullying: The precaution adoption process model. Education and information technologies, 21( 4), 719-728. doi: 10.1007/s10639-014-9349-1 URL
10	Chen, X., &Feng, Z. Z . ( 2015). Trait rumination and deficits of executive functions. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23( 6), 1065-1069.
11	[ 陈骁, 冯正直 . ( 2015). 特质反刍思维与执行控制功能缺陷. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23( 6), 1065-1069.] doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.06.026 URL
12	DeWall C. N., Anderson C. A., & Bushman B. J . ( 2011). The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1( 3), 245-258. doi: 10.1037/a0023842 URL
13	Dickson K. S., Ciesla J A., & Zelic K . ( 2017). The role of executive functioning in adolescent rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41( 1), 62-72. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9802-0 URL
14	Egan V., Hughes N., & Palmer E. J . ( 2015). Moral disengagement, the dark triad, and unethical consumer attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.054 URL
15	Eisenlohr-Moul T. A., Peters J. R., Pond P. S. Jr., & Dewall C. N . ( 2016). Both trait and state mindfulness predict lower aggressiveness via anger rumination: A multilevel mediation analysis. Mindfulness, 7( 3), 713-726. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0508-x URL
16	Feinstein B. A., Bhatia V., & Davila J . ( 2014). Rumination mediates the association between cyber-victimization and depressive symptoms. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29( 9), 1732-1746. doi: 10.1177/0886260513511534 URL pmid: 24346650
17	Finkelhor D., Turner H., Ormrod R., & Hamby S. L . ( 2009). Violence, abuse, and crime exposure in a national sample of children and youth. Pediatrics, 124( 5), 1411-1423. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.42 URL pmid: 23700186
18	García-Sancho E., Salguero J. M., & Fernández-Berrocal P . ( 2016). Angry rumination as a mediator of the relationship between ability emotional intelligence and various types of aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.007 URL
19	Grigg, D. W . ( 2010). Cyber aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20( 2), 143-156.
20	Guerra, R. C., & White, B. A . ( 2017). Psychopathy and functions of aggression in emerging adulthood: Moderation by anger rumination and gender. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39( 1), 35-45.
21	Han, X., &Yang, H. F . ( 2009). Chinese Version of Nolen-Hoeksema Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) used in 912 college students: Reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17( 5), 550-551.
22	[ 韩秀, 杨宏飞 . ( 2009). Nolen-hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17( 5), 550-551.]
23	Howard A. L., Kimonis E. R., Muñoz L. C., & Frick P. J . ( 2012). Violence exposure mediates the relation between callous-unemotional traits and offending patterns in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40( 8), 1237-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9647-2 URL
24	Hu, Y., &Fan, C. Y . ( 2013). A Review of Researches into Adolescents' Cyberbullying Behavior. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 5, 72-84.
25	[ 胡阳, 范翠英 . ( 2013). 青少年网络欺负行为研究述评与展望. 中国特殊教育, 5, 72-84.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2013.05.016 URL
26	Jin T. L., Lu G. Z., Zhang L., Jin X. Z., & Wang, X Y . ( 2017). The effect of trait anger on online aggressive behavior of college students: The role of moral disengagement. Psychological Development and Education, 33( 5), 605-613.
27	[ 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 金祥忠, 王晓雨 . ( 2017). 特质愤怒对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:道德推脱的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33( 5), 605-613.] doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.05.11 URL
28	Jin T. L., Lu G. Z., Zhang L., Yan M. Z., & Liu, Y L . ( 2016). The effect of college students’ interpersonal needs on their online deviant behavior: The mediating effect of social anxiety. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 9, 84-89.
29	[ 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 闫萌智, 刘艳丽 . ( 2016). 人际需求对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:社交焦虑的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 9, 84-89.]
30	Kessel S. S., O'Donnell L., & Smith E . ( 2015). Trends in cyberbullying and school bullying victimization in a regional census of high school students, 2006-2012. Journal of School Health, 85( 9), 611-620.
31	Kliewer, W., &Lepore, S. J . ( 2015). Exposure to violence, social cognitive processing, and sleep problems in urban adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44( 2), 507-517. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0184-x URL pmid: 25218396
32	Kokkinos C. M., Voulgaridou I., & Markos A . ( 2016). Personality and relational aggression: Moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028 URL
33	Li D. M., Lei L., & Zou H . ( 2008). Characteristics and prospects of the adolescents’ deviant behaviors on internet. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16( 1), 95-97.
34	[ 李冬梅, 雷雳, 邹泓 . ( 2008). 青少年网上偏差行为的特点与研究展望. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16( 1), 95-97.]
35	Litwiller, B. J., & Brausch, A. M . ( 2013). Cyber bullying and physical bullying in adolescent suicide: The role of violent behavior and substance use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42( 5), 675-684. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9925-5 URL
36	Liu Q. Q., Zhou Z. K., Niu G. F., & Fan C. Y . ( 2017). Mobile phone addiction and sleep quality in adolescents: Mediation and moderation analyses. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 12), 1524-1536. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01524 URL
37	[ 刘庆奇, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 范翠英 . ( 2017). 手机成瘾与青少年睡眠质量: 中介与调节作用分析. 心理学报, 49 ( 12), 1524-1536.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01524 URL
38	Liu W., Tian L. L., & Lu H . ( 2014). Rumination and suicide ideation among Chinese working women: Moderating role of hope. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22( 1), 119-122.
39	[ 刘旺, 田丽丽, 陆红 . ( 2014). 职业女性反刍思维与自杀意念的关系:希望的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22( 1), 119-122.]
40	Liu Y., Zhou Z. K., Zhang C. L., Wei H., & Chen W . ( 2011). Short-term effects of violent video games on implicit aggression in different aged female students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19( 2), 157-159.
41	[ 刘元, 周宗奎, 张从丽, 魏华, 陈武 . ( 2011). 暴力视频游戏对不同年龄女性内隐攻击性的短时效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19( 2), 157-159.]
42	Luo, X. L . ( 2007). Internet psycho-structure of moral trait, moral consciousness and their relationship of undergraduates (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central China Normal University, Wuhan.
43	[ 罗晓玲 . ( 2007). 大学生网络道德、道德意识及其相互关系研究(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.]
44	Ma, X. H., & Lei, L. ( 2010). Adolescents’ internet morality and deviant behavior online. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42( 10), 988-997.
45	[ 马晓辉, 雷雳 . ( 2010). 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系. 心理学报, 42( 10), 988-997.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00988 URL
46	Mcmahon S. D., Felix E. D., Halpert J. A., & Petropoulos, L. A. N. ( 2009). Community violence exposure and aggression among urban adolescents: Testing a cognitive mediator model. Journal of Community Psychology, 37( 7), 895-910. doi: 10.1002/jcop.v37:7 URL
47	Nolen-Hoeksema, S. ( 1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100( 4), 569-582. doi: 10.1037//0021-843X.100.4.569 URL pmid: 1757671
48	Ogunfowora, B., &Bourdage, J. S . ( 2014). Does honesty- humility influence evaluations of leadership emergence? The mediating role of moral disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 56( 1), 95-99.
49	Pabian, S., &Vandebosch, H. ( 2016). An investigation of short-term longitudinal associations between social anxiety and victimization and perpetration of traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of youth and adolescence, 45( 2), 328-339. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0259-3 URL
50	Peters J. R., Smart L. M., Eisenlohr-Moul T. A., Geiger P. J., Smith G. T., & Baer R. A . ( 2015). Anger rumination as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and aggression: The utility of a multidimensional mindfulness model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71( 9), 871-884. doi: 10.1002/jclp.2015.71.issue-9 URL
51	Ruddle A., Pina A., & Vasquez E . ( 2017). Domestic violence offending behaviors: A review of the literature examining childhood exposure, implicit theories, trait aggression and anger rumination as predictive factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 154-165. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.016 URL
52	Schwartz, D., &Proctor, L. J . ( 2000). Community violence exposure and children's social adjustment in the school peer group: The mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68( 4), 670-683. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.670 URL
53	Slavish, D. C., & Graham-Engeland, J. E . ( 2015). Rumination mediates the relationships between depressed mood and both sleep quality and self-reported health in young adults.[J] ournal of Behavioral Medicine, 38( 2), 204-213.
54	Sotelo, J. M., & Babcock, J. C . ( 2013). Bis/bas variables as moderators of the rumination-intimate partner violence link. Journal of Family Violence, 28( 3), 233-242. doi: 10.1007/s10896-013-9500-6 URL
55	Wang, X. C, Lei, L., Yang J. P., Gao L., & Zhao F. Q . ( 2016). Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48( 2), 316-326.
56	Wei H., Zhang C. L., Zhou Z. K., Jin Q., & Tian Y . ( 2010). Long-term and short-term effects of violent media on aggression of undergraduates. Psychological Development and Education, 26( 5), 489-494.
57	[ 魏华, 张丛丽, 周宗奎, 金琼, 田媛 . ( 2010). 媒体暴力对大学生攻击性的长时效应和短时效应. 心理发展与教育, 26( 5), 489-494.]
58	Wells, A., &Matthews, G. ( 1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-Ref model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34( 11-12), 881-885. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00050-2 URL pmid: 8990539
59	Whitmer,A. J., & Gotlib, I. H . ( 2013). An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychological Bulletin, 139( 5), 1036-1061. doi: 10.1037/a0030923 URL pmid: 23244316
60	Wong L. M., Bullock L. M., & Gable R. A . ( 2011). Cyberbullying: Practices to face digital aggression. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 16(3), 317-325. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2011.595098 URL
61	Wu, M. L . ( 2013). Structural equation model: Advanced Amos practice. Chongqing: Chongqing university press.
62	[ 吴明隆 . ( 2013). 结构方程模型: Amos实务进阶. 重庆:重庆大学出版社.]
63	Wu,X. Y . ( 2012). Effects of violence clue exposure on aggressive behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ningbo University.
64	[ 吴晓燕 . ( 2012). 暴力线索暴露对攻击行为的影响机制(硕士学位论文). 宁波大学.]
65	Wu X. Y., Zhu Y. J., Fang S. J., & Zhang L . ( 2012). The new progresses in research on aggression behavior. Journal of Ningbo Institute of Education, 14( 1), 56-59.
66	[ 吴晓燕, 祝阳君, 方圣杰, 张林 . ( 2012). 关于攻击行为研究的新进展. 宁波教育学院学报, 14( 1), 56-59.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2560.2012.01.016 URL
67	Wu Y., Wen Z. L., Hou J. T., & Marsh H. W . ( 2011). Appropriate standardized estimates of latent interaction model without the mean structure. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43( 10), 1219-1228. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1000278 URL
68	[ 吴艳, 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, Marsh, H. W . ( 2011). 无均值结构的潜变量交互效应模型的标准化估计. 心理学报, 43( 10), 1219-1228.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.01219 URL
69	Xiong H. X., Zhang J., Ye B. J., Zheng X., & Sun P. Z . ( 2012). Common method variance effects and the models of statistical approaches for controlling it. Advances in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 757-769. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00757 URL
70	[ 熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞 . ( 2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20( 5), 757-769.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.00757 URL
71	Ye, B. J., & Wen, Z. L . ( 2013). A discussion on testing methods for mediated moderation models: Discrimination and integration. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45( 9), 1050-1060. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01050 URL
72	[ 叶宝娟, 温忠麟 . ( 2013). 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合. 心理学报, 45( 9), 1050-1060.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01050 URL
73	Ye B. J., Zheng Q., Yao Y. M., & Zhao L . ( 2016). Moral disengagement on cyber-bullying: Mediating of internet morality and moderation of moral identity. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24( 6), 1105-1107.
74	[ 叶宝娟, 郑清, 姚媛梅, 赵磊 . ( 2016). 道德推脱对大学生网络欺负的影响:网络道德的中介作用与道德认同的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24( 6), 1105-1107.]
75	Yuan,F. F., Wu, H. P, & Huang, Q. Q . ( 2016). Current situation and influencing factors of rumination of nurses suffered from workplace violence. Chinese Nursing Management, 16( 5), 610-613.
76	[ 袁芬芬, 吴惠萍, 黄茜茜 . ( 2016). 遭受工作场所暴力护士反刍性沉思水平及其影响因素分析. 中国护理管理, 16( 5), 610-613.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2016.05.010 URL
77	Zhang L., Liu S., Xu Q., Wu X. Y., & Yang M. Y . ( 2017). Long-term effect of violence exposure in real-life on aggressive behaviors: A moderated mediation model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 1), 50-59. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00050 URL
78	[ 张林, 刘燊, 徐强, 吴晓燕, 杨梦圆 . ( 2017). 日常环境中的暴力暴露对攻击行为的长期影响:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理学报, 49( 1), 50-59.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00050 URL
79	Zhao, F., &Gao, W. B . ( 2012). Reliability and validity of the Adolescent Online Aggressive Behavior Scale. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 26( 6), 439-444.
80	[ 赵锋, 高文斌 . ( 2012). 少年网络攻击行为评定量表编制及信效度检验. 中国心理卫生杂志, 26( 6), 439-444.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2012.06.009 URL
81	Zhu, L. ( 2016). An investigation of the types and causes of college students’ online anomie behavior. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 34( 2), 88-95.
82	[ 朱琳 . ( 2016). 大学生网络行为失范的类型、成因与对策. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 34( 2), 88-95.]

变量	M ± SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. 暴力环境接触均分	1.58 ± 0.85	1
2. 症状反刍	1.83 ± 0.54	0.22^**	1
3. 反省深思	1.96 ± 0.61	0.20^**	0.69^**	1
4. 强迫思考	2.04 ± 0.62	0.20^**	0.75^**	0.76^**	1
5. 反刍思维均分	1.94 ± 0.54	0.22^**	0.89^**	0.91^**	0.93^**	1
6. 网络道德均分	4.85 ± 1.16	-0.14^**	0.03	0.07^*	0.09^*	0.07^*	1
7. 工具性攻击	1.16 ± 0.32	0.26^**	0.25^**	0.16^**	0.16^**	0.20^**	-0.17^**	1
8. 反应性攻击	1.13 ± 0.31	0.30^**	0.25^**	0.18^**	0.17^**	0.21^**	-0.16^**	0.83^**	1
9. 网络攻击行为均分	1.15 ± 0.30	0.29^**	0.26^**	0.17^**	0.17^**	0.22^**	-0.17^**	0.96^**	0.95^**	1

变量	M ± SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. 暴力环境接触均分	1.58 ± 0.85	1
2. 症状反刍	1.83 ± 0.54	0.22^**	1
3. 反省深思	1.96 ± 0.61	0.20^**	0.69^**	1
4. 强迫思考	2.04 ± 0.62	0.20^**	0.75^**	0.76^**	1
5. 反刍思维均分	1.94 ± 0.54	0.22^**	0.89^**	0.91^**	0.93^**	1
6. 网络道德均分	4.85 ± 1.16	-0.14^**	0.03	0.07^*	0.09^*	0.07^*	1
7. 工具性攻击	1.16 ± 0.32	0.26^**	0.25^**	0.16^**	0.16^**	0.20^**	-0.17^**	1
8. 反应性攻击	1.13 ± 0.31	0.30^**	0.25^**	0.18^**	0.17^**	0.21^**	-0.16^**	0.83^**	1
9. 网络攻击行为均分	1.15 ± 0.30	0.29^**	0.26^**	0.17^**	0.17^**	0.22^**	-0.17^**	0.96^**	0.95^**	1

[1]	兰泽波, 郭梅华, 姜琨, 吴俊杰, 闫国利. 听障大学生词汇识别过程的特异性：语言经验和阅读能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 954-967.
[2]	丁倩, 唐云, 魏华, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 相对剥夺感与大学生网络游戏成瘾的关系：一个有调节的中介模型 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1041-1050.
[3]	连帅磊, 孙晓军, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社交网站中的上行社会比较与抑郁的关系：一个有调节的中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 941-952.
[4]	卢家楣;刘伟;贺雯;王俊山;陈念劬;解登峰. 中国当代大学生情感素质的现状及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 1-16.
[5]	任志洪; 李献云; 赵陵波; 余香莲; 李政汉; 赖丽足; 阮怡君; 江光荣. 抑郁症网络化自助干预的效果及作用机制 ——以汉化MoodGYM为例[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 818-832.
[6]	黄四林; 韩明跃; 宁彩芳; 林崇德. 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 684-692.
[7]	黄四林;韩明跃;张梅;. 人际关系对社会责任感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 578-587.
[8]	应梦婷;江光荣;于丽霞;鲁婷. 大学生自伤行为的强化敏感性基础[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 258-270.
[9]	周璠;石岩. 女大学生体重知觉偏差及探因[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 101-112 .
[10]	辛自强,张梅,何琳. 大学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(5): 664-679.
[11]	王娟,沈树华,张积家. 大学生的气味词分类—— 基于语义相似性和知觉相似性的探讨[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(10): 1124-1137.
[12]	陈爱国,殷恒婵,颜军,杨钰. 不同强度短时有氧运动对执行功能的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(09): 1055-1062.
[13]	马晓辉,雷雳. 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(10): 988-997.
[14]	王静琼,张卫,朱祖德,甄霜菊,麦玉娇,李董平. 大学生自主学习影响因素的中介效应模型[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(02): 262-270.
[15]	郑希付. 网络成瘾者不同情绪状态下的认知加工特征[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(07): 630-638.