Please wait a minute...
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
抑制对老年人舌尖现象的影响
彭华茂1,毛晓飞2
1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所
2. 第二军医大学心理系
Will the deficit of inhibition increase the rates of Tip-of-the-tongue among the elderly?
1.
2. Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, The Second Military Medical University
全文: PDF(0 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 抑制不足理论认为老年人抑制能力不足,易受干扰信息的影响,阻碍对目标词的检索,故比年轻人有更多舌尖现象。实验1操纵抑制通达子功能探讨其在老年人舌尖现象中的作用,采用2(干扰条件:有、无干扰)×2(年龄:老年、年轻)的混合设计,相比于无干扰条件,干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异变得更大,表明老年人舌尖现象和通达功能衰退有关。实验2操纵抑制删除子功能,采用2(是否激活干扰:激活、不激活)×2(年龄:老年、年轻)的混合设计,不激活干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异不显著,而激活干扰条件下舌尖现象年龄差异显著,舌尖现象随龄增多与删除功能衰退有关。通达和删除功能不足是老年人舌尖现象增多的重要原因。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
彭华茂
毛晓飞
关键词 舌尖现象老年人抑制通达删除    
Abstract:The definition of the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) refers to a speaker seems to have accessed a word’s meaning adequately but is unable to complete the sound form or phonological label of the word. Both diary studies that document TOTs episodes and experimental methods designed to generate TOTs have proved that older adults experience more TOTs than young or middle age adults. With regard to the aging mechanism, the inhibition deficit theory supposed that older adults are more likely than young adults to fail to retrieve the answers because of activation the irrelevant information, which interferes the retrieval of the target name. The contents of inhibition include limiting access to irrelevant information(access), deleting information that is no longer relevant(deletion), and restraining the production of dominant responses(restrain). This study consisted of two experimental tasks, which were designed to explore the roles of access function and deletion function respectively in TOT among the elderly. In experiment 1, a 2(age: old and young) × 2(interference condition: with/without interference) mixed design was adopted, to examine the role of access function in TOT among the old adults. In order to investigate the impact of deletion function, Thirty young people (aged 18 to 33 years old) and thirty older adult (aged 60 to 79 years old) were recruited. Participants in interferential condition were asked not to pay attention to the interferential stimulate when performing the TOT task. To examine the role of deletion function in TOT among the elderly, an another 2 (age: old and young) × 2 (activate condition: activate interferential stimulate or not) mixed design was adopted in experiment 2. Thirty young people (aged 19 to 27 years old) and thirty older adult (aged 61 to 78 years old) were recruited for experiment 2 and they learned the interferential stimulate before the TOT task in the condition of activating interferential stimulate. To explore the effects of access function and deletion function in the TOT among the old people. Two–way repeated measures ANOVA analysis was used to analyze the data. In the experiment 1, the interaction between age and interference condition were significant. Only the old group had significantly higher rates of TOT in the condition with interference than that without interference. In order to analyze the role of access function further, a one-way ANOVA was adopted and the rates of TOT in the condition without interference was controlled as covariate, the result revealed the elderly had more rates of TOT than the young group. This result indicated the access function influence the rates of the TOT among the old people. Similarly, two–way repeated measures ANOVA analysis was used to analyze the data in experiments 2, the interaction between age and activate condition were significant. The old group had higher rates of TOT in the condition of activating interferential, rather than the young group. The results demonstrated that the deficits of access function and deletion function of older adult may be responsible for the higher rates of TOT, which provided supportive proof for the inhibition deficit theory. The study imply that intervention of inhibition may be useful in improving the TOT of old adult.
Key wordsTip-of-the-tongue    The elderly    Inhibition    Access    Deletion
收稿日期: 2017-09-28      出版日期: 2018-06-22
基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金
通讯作者: 彭华茂   
引用本文:   
彭华茂 毛晓飞. 抑制对老年人舌尖现象的影响[J]. , .
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y/V/I/0
[1]Abrams, L, Trunk, D. L., & Merrill, L. A. .Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: Activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adults' tip-of-the-tongue states[J]. Psychology and Aging, 2007, (22): 835-845 [2]Arbuckle, T.Y., & Gold, D. P. (1993). Aging, inhibition and verbosity. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48, 225-232. [3]Aron, A.R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 170-177. [4]Askari, N.(1999). Priming effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Farsi-English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(2), 197-212. [5]Ayasse, N., & Wingfield, A. (2017). The impact of context and competition on speech comprehension in younger and older adults revealed using eye-tracking and pupillometry. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 3747-3747. [6]Borella, E., Ghisletta, P., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2011). Age differences in text processing: The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(3), 311-320. [7]Brown, A.S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 204-223. [8]Brown, R ., & McNeill, D.(1966) . The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325-337. [9]Burke, D.M., & MacKay, D. G. (1997). Memory, language, and ageing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1363), 1845-1856. [10]Burke, D.M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 542-579. [11]Cahana-Amitay, D., Spiro III, A., Sayers, J. T., Oveis, A. C., Higby, E., Ojo, E. A., ... & Obler, L. K. (2016). How older adults use cognition in sentence-final word recognition. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 23(4), 418-444. [12]Chen, X., Zhang, J., & Zhu, X. (2015). The Research of inhibition deficit hypothesis in the aging of speech production: Evidence from different speech level. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47 (3), 329-343. [13][陈栩茜, 张积家, & 朱云霞.(2015). 言语产生老化中的抑制损伤: 来自不同任务的证据. 心理学报, 47 (3), 329-343.] [14]Choi, H., & Smith, S. M. (2005). Incubation and the resolution of tip-of-the-tongue states. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 365-376. [15]Cohen, J.I., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2017). The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(5), 470-476. [16]Cross, E.S., & Burke, D. M. (2004). Do alternative names block young and older adults’ retrieval of proper names?. Brain and Language, 89(1), 174-181. [17]Dahlgren, D.J. (1998). Impact of knowledge and age on tip-of-the-tongue rates. Experimental Aging Research, 24(2), 139-153. [18]Dempster, F.N. (1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12, 45-75. [19]Fang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2013). Roles of semantic similarity and category size on semantic effect in picture-word interference paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(5), 523-537. [20][方燕红 & 张积家.(2013). 语义相似性与类别大小对图-词干扰范式下语义效应的影响. 心理学报, 45(5), 523-537.] [21]Gao, Y.(2013). The role of visual perceptual Stress in inhibition aging (Unpublished master thesis). Beijing Normal University. [22][高悦.(2013). 视知觉压力在抑制老化中的作用. 硕士学位论文. 北京师范大学.] [23]Gong, Y.(1992). Manual of wechsler adult intelligence scale–chinese version. Hunan: Hunan Map Press. [24][龚耀先.(1992). 韦氏成人智力量表手册. 湖南:湖南地图出版社.] [25]Gopych, P.M. (1999). Determination of memory performance. JINR Rapid Communications, 4, 96-99. [26]Hartley, A.(1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8, 371-379. [27]Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., & May C P.(1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. Daniel, G., & Asher, K. (Eds). Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Attention and performance., (pp. 653-675). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. [28]Huang.Y., Wang, D., Xiao, H., & Jiang, W. (2014). Effects of aging on false memory within DRM paradigm: A study based on fuzzy-trace theory. Psychological Development and Education. 30(1), 24-30. [29][黄一帆, 王大华, 肖红蕊, & 姜薇.(2014). DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制. 心理发展与教育, 30(1), 24-30.] [30]James, L.E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1378-1391. [31]Jones, G.V. (1989). Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 17(1), 69-76. [32]Jones, G.V., & Langford, S. (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26(2), 115-122. [33]MacKay, D.G., & Burke, D. M. (1990). Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of old connections. Aging and Cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization, 213-263. [34]Meyer, A.S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon:Blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition, 20, 715-726. [35]Nelson, T.O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(3), 338-368. [36]Rastle, K.G., & Burke, D. M. (1996). Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(4), 586-605. [37]Reason, J.T., & Lucas, D. (1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent Mindedness, 53-70. [38]Roediger, H.L. (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory and Cognition, 2(2), 261-269. [39]Ryan, E.B., Meneer, W. B., & Trovato, D. (1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. Sage Focus Editions, 173, 15-15. [40]Samanez-Larkin, G.R., Robertson, E. R., Mikels, J. A., Carstensen, L. L., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain. Psychology and aging, 24(3), 519-529. [41]Schwartz, B.L. (2010). The effects of emotion on tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(1), 82-87. [42]Shafto, M.A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583-587. [43]Shafto, M.A., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & Tyler, L. K. (2010). Word retrieval failures in old age: the relationship between structure and function. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1530-1540. [44]Sunderland, A., Watts, K., Baddeley, A. D., & Harris, J. E. (1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 376-384. [45]Woodworth, R.S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt. [46]Yin, S., & Peng, H. (2016). The Role of Inhibition in Age-related Off-Topic Verbosity: Not Access but Deletion and Restraint Functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-11. [47]Zacks, R.T., & Hasher, L. (1993). Capacity theory and the processing of inferences. In Burke, Deborah M. (Eds.). Language, Memory, and Aging., (pp. 154-170). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. [48]Zacks, R.T., & Hasher, L. (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In: Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. H. (Eds.), Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory, and Language (pp. 241-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [49]Zhang, H.(2013). The condition of questions that used in TOT research and the effect of emotion on TOT. (Unpublished master thesis). Henan University. [50][张红亚.(2013). 舌尖现象研究的选题条件和情绪对舌尖现象的作用. 硕士学位论文. 河南大学.] [51]Zhou, R.(2013). The classic psychological experiments (the second version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. [52][周仁来.(2013). 心理学经典实验案例(第2版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.]
[1] 尚俊辰, 刘智慧, 陈文锋, 傅小兰.  美感对西方绘画无意识加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 693-702.
[2] 王慧慧, 罗玉丹, 石冰, 余凤琼, 汪凯. 经颅直流电刺激对健康大学生反应抑制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 647-654.
[3] 杨伟星, 张堂正, 李红霞, 张佳佳, 司继伟.  数学困难儿童估算策略运用的 中央执行负荷效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(5): 504-516.
[4] 张秀玲, 庞兆阳, 姜云鹏, 张明, 蒋毅.  情绪学习促进无意识信息进入意识[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 253-259.
[5] 杨青青, 胡娜, 陈旭, 牛娟, 翟晶.  恋人亲密情景下的回避型与安全型 依恋个体情绪调节电生理差异[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 306-316.
[6] 李杨卓, 钱浩悦, 朱敏, 高湘萍.  自我相关信息对视觉搜索主动抑制的易化作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(1): 28-35.
[7] 刘湍丽, 白学军.  部分线索对记忆提取的影响:认知抑制能力的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[8] 王爱君, 刘晓乐, 唐晓雨, 张 明.  三维空间中不同视野深度位置上的返回抑制[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 723-732.
[9] 柯淳淳, 聂爱情, 张瑞卿.  回忆任务对合作抑制和错误修剪的调节 ——情绪效价和编码水平的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 733-744.
[10] 江荣焕, 李晓东.  比例推理的过度使用及其认知机制: 一项发展性的负启动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 745-758.
[11] 孙悦亮;郑伟意;何先友. 纯小数加工的心理机制:选择通达还是平行通达?[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 611-621.
[12] 张奇林;周艺梦. 中国城镇低龄退休老年人工作与幸福感的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 472-481.
[13] 冯彪;徐亮;张蔚欣;陈婷;王文清;郑希付. 积极情绪对条件性恐惧泛化的抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 317-328.
[14] 吴诗玉;张宇英;胡青青. 第二语言阅读“熔断”假说的认知心理证据:在线篇章处理的范式[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 285-295.
[15] 刘豫;陈红;李书慧;罗念. 在线抑制控制训练对失败的限制性饮食者不健康食物选择的改善[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 219-227.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn