Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型
陈武1,2;李董平1,2;鲍振宙3;闫昱文1,2;周宗奎1,2
(1青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079) (2华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079) (3华南师范大学心理学院, 广州 510631)
The Impact of Parent-Child Attachment on Adolescent Problematic Internet Use: A Moderated Mediation Model
CHEN Wu1,2; LI Dongping1,2; BAO Zhenzhou3; YAN Yuwen1,2; ZHOU Zongkui1,2
(1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behaivor (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) (3 School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
全文: PDF(581 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

研究表明, 亲子依恋对青少年问题性网络使用(PIU)具有重要影响, 但是亲子依恋起作用的中介和调节机制少有研究涉及。在发展系统理论及依恋理论的基本框架下, 本研究基于“社会发展模型/初级社会化理论”和“个体—环境交互作用观”, 构建一个有调节的中介模型, 同时考察家庭因素(亲子依恋)、同伴因素(越轨同伴交往)和个体因素(意志控制)对青少年PIU的影响及其作用机制。以2758名初中生为被试(平均年龄13.53岁, SD = 1.06), 让其自我报告亲子依恋、越轨同伴交往、意志控制和PIU的情况。多元回归分析表明:(1)在控制了性别、年龄、社会经济地位后, 亲子依恋对PIU具有负向预测作用。(2)亲子依恋通过越轨同伴交往的中介作用间接影响PIU。(3)该间接效应受到意志控制的调节。相对于意志控制水平高的青少年, 间接效应对于意志控制水平低的青少年更显著。研究结果有利于从发展系统理论不同亚系统及其相互作用的视角理解亲子关系“如何”及“何时”影响青少年PIU。青少年PIU的预防干预不仅要重视家庭因素、同伴因素和个体因素的单独影响, 更要重视这些因素的联合作用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈武
李董平
鲍振宙
闫昱文
周宗奎
关键词 问题性网络使用亲子依恋越轨同伴交往意志控制青少年    
Abstract

Problematic Internet use (PIU) and its detrimental effects on adolescents’ adjustment has become a hot topic of research in developmental psychology. Among many factors influencing adolescent PIU, the role of parent-child attachment has increasingly received attention of both practitioners and researchers over the past few years. There is substantial literature documenting that parent-child attachment has an important influence on adolescent PIU, but little is known about the mediating and moderating mechanisms underlying this relation. Under the basic framework of development system theories and attachment theory, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model based on the social development model and the organism-environment interaction model to examine the effect of family factors (parent-child attachment), peer factors (deviant peer affiliation) and individual factors (effortful control) on PIU and the underling mechanisms. Specifically, the present study examined whether parental attachment would be indirectly related to adolescent PIU through deviant peer affiliation, and whether this indirect association would be moderated by adolescent effortful control. This integrated model can address questions about both mediation and moderation in one model which was helpful to answer the issues such as “what works for whom”, and provide valuable information for early identification and prevention that cannot be obtained by separately testing the two questions. A total of 2758 junior high school students (mean age = 13.53 years, SD = 1.06) participated in this study. Adolescents’ perceived attachment to their parents was measured by the subscale of parental attachment adapted from the short form of Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA). Adolescent affiliation with deviant peers was assessed with deviant peer affiliation questionnaire. The short form of Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised was used to assess effortful control. Adolescent PIU was assessed with questionnaire for screening of PIU. All the measures have good reliability and validity. Multiple regression analysis showed that: (1) After controlling for gender, age, and socioeconomic status, the parent-child attachment has a negative effect on adolescent PIU. (2) The negative association between parent-child attachment and adolescent PIU was mediated by deviant peer affiliation. (3) The mediating effect of deviant peer affiliation was moderated by effortful control. The indirect effect was stronger for adolescents with low self-control than for those with high self-control. These findings contribute to our understanding of how and when parent-child attachment impacts adolescent PIU from different subsystems of development system theories. On the one hand, peer relationships relative to the parent-child attachment, may be a stronger social control factors in a way that parents and educators should be actively concern about whether the child was associated with deviant peers, and give reasonable guidance to help solve their confusion encountered in peer interactions. On the other hand, more attentions should be paid to the low self-control individuals (especially improve their parent-child attachment condition) and low parent-child attachment individuals (especially improve their self-control abilities). Last but not the least, the prevention and interventions for adolescent PIU should not only pay attention to the effect of family factors, peer factors (especially deviant peer affiliation) and individual factors (especially self-control), but also to the combined influence of those factors.

Key wordsproblematic Internet use    parent-child attachment    deviant peer affiliation    effortful control    adolescents
收稿日期: 2014-06-05      出版日期: 2015-05-25
基金资助:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助; 国家社科基金重大攻关项目(11&ZD151)资助。

通讯作者: 李董平, E-mail: lidongping83@126.com; 周宗奎, E-mail: zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn    
引用本文:   
陈武;李董平;鲍振宙;闫昱文;周宗奎. 亲子依恋与青少年的问题性网络使用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00611.
CHEN Wu; LI Dongping; BAO Zhenzhou; YAN Yuwen; ZHOU Zongkui. The Impact of Parent-Child Attachment on Adolescent Problematic Internet Use: A Moderated Mediation Model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 611-623.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00611      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I5/611
[1] 杨海波;赵欣;汪洋;张磊;王瑞萌; 张毅;王力. PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷的情绪特异性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 643-652.
[2] 王艳辉;李董平;孙文强;赵力燕;赖雪芬;周月月. 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 663-679.
[3] 周宵;伍新春;曾旻;田雨馨. 青少年的情绪调节策略对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 969-980.
[4] 李董平;周月月;赵力燕;王艳辉;孙文强. 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1519-1537.
[5] 牛更枫;孙晓军;周宗奎;孔繁昌;田媛. 基于QQ空间的社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较和自尊的序列中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1282-1291.
[6] 陆青云;陶芳标;侯方丽;孙莹. 青少年应激下皮质醇应答与风险决策相关性的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 647-655.
[7] 王明忠;范翠英;周宗奎;陈武. 父母冲突影响青少年抑郁和社交焦虑 —— 基于认知-情境理论和情绪安全感理论[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 90-100.
[8] 田录梅,陈光辉,王姝琼,刘海娇,张文新. 父母支持、友谊支持对早中期青少年孤独感和抑郁的影响[J]. , 2012, 44(7): 944-956.
[9] 李董平,张卫,李丹黎,王艳辉,甄霜菊. 教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 211-225.
[10] 崔丽霞;史光远;张玉静;于园. 青少年抑郁综合认知模型及其性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1501-1514.
[11] 范方,耿富磊,张岚,朱清. 负性生活事件、社会支持和创伤后应激障碍症状:对汶川地震后青少年的追踪研究[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1398-1407.
[12] 刘肖岑,桑标,窦东徽. 人际/非人际情境下青少年外显与内隐的自我提升[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1293-1307.
[13] 徐夫真,张文新. 青少年疏离感与病理性互联网使用的关系:家庭功能和同伴接纳的调节效应检验[J]. , 2011, 43(04): 410-419.
[14] 陈晶,索涛,袁文萍,冯廷勇. 青少年结果预期与评价的ERP研究[J]. , 2011, 43(02): 152-163.
[15] 马晓辉,雷雳. 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系[J]. , 2010, 42(10): 988-997.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn