ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (09): 977-982.

• •    下一篇

直觉对内隐学习优势效应的特异性贡献

郭秀艳;姜珊;凌晓丽;朱磊;唐菁华   

  1. (1 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062) (2 复旦大学心理系, 上海 200433)
    (3 南京中医药大学心理学院, 南京 210046)
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-21 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2011-09-30 出版日期:2011-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 唐菁华

Specific Contribution of Intuition to Implicit Learning Superiority

GUO Xiu-Yan;JIANG Shan;LING Xiao-Li;ZHU Lei;TANG Jing-Hua   

  1. (1 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
    (2 Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
    (3 School of Psychology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210046, China)
  • Received:2010-12-21 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-09-30 Published:2011-09-30
  • Contact: TANG Jing-Hua

摘要: 已有人工语法的内隐学习研究中一个关键的问题是被试在不同指导语诱发下究竟形成了什么样的知识表征?实验借助结构知识的测量方式, 采用记忆和规则探索两种指导语, 考察了两组被试所获得的深层知识表征(结构知识)。结果发现:(1)在记忆指导语条件下, 被试获得了语法规则; (2)直觉在记忆指导语条件下贡献突出, 表现出特异性。该结果表明记忆指导语引发了被试基于直觉区分人工语法规则的内隐学习优势效应。

关键词: 直觉, 内隐学习优势效应, 结构知识

Abstract: An impressive human talent is the ability to acquire complex structures and regularities in the surroundings implicitly. Indeed, it is this cognitive ability that has prompted a host of noted researchers to raise some questions about the nature of the implicit learning. It is repeatedly revealed that implicit (incidental) learning had its superiority over explicit (intentional) learning when participants were carrying out the artificial grammar learning task. Specifically, memorization instruction induced better classification performance than rule-searching instruction. There currently is debate, however, whether this implicit learning superiority is due to the specific contribution of unconscious structural knowledge, i.e., guess or intuition. That is, whether the contribution of unconscious structural knowledge is limited to incidental learning, or it can be applied generally to all situations, including intentional learning under rule-searching instructions?
To tackle this issue, the present study examined the contribution of conscious and unconscious structural knowledge for incidental and intentional learning by structural knowledge measurement. A 2 learning mode (incidental vs. intentional) between-subject design was adopted. During the learning phase, participants were presented with 144 letter strings which were generate from a finite-state grammar under two learning conditions. Incidental learning group was required to memorize each string, whereas intentional learning group was asked to search the rule underlying the strings. After that, they were asked to classify a new set of strings according to whether the string followed the same pattern or structure as the strings presented before.
It turned out that: 1) incidental learning group exhibited significantly better performance than intentional learning group, indicated implicit learning superiority, 2) the accuracy of intuition responses for incidental learning group was significantly higher than intentional learning group, which implied a specific contribution of intuition to implicit learning superiority.
To conclude, this finding gave a plausible answer to aforementioned question. The contribution of unconscious structural knowledge is limited to incidental learning, which leads to implicit learning superiority.

Key words: intuition, implicit learning superiority, structural knowledge