ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (02): 247-252.

• • 上一篇    

谈谈心理学研究设计的基本逻辑 ——答《关于两项样例学习心理实验研究报告的分析与评论》

莫雷   

  1. 华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州,510631
  • 收稿日期:2004-01-28 修回日期:2004-01-28 发布日期:2004-03-30 出版日期:2004-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 莫雷

COMPREHENDING THE BASIC LOGIC OF THE DESIGNING OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT: DISCUSS WITH SHAO GUANGHUA

Mo Lei   

  1. (Center for studies of psychological application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
  • Received:2004-01-28 Revised:2004-01-28 Online:2004-03-30 Published:2004-03-30
  • Contact: Mo Lei

摘要: 对Ross1987年与1989年关于样例表面概貌影响原理通达与原理运用的两项研究以及莫雷2000年针对Ross关于“表面概貌不影响原理运用”的结论所进行的研究进行了分析,然后指出,莫雷2000年根据对Ross的研究结论的质疑所做的研究是逻辑严密的,根据莫雷的实验设计及结果,可以得出“表面概貌影响了原理运用”的结论。邵文对莫雷的研究的质疑,首先是由于对心理学因果研究的基本设计逻辑不了解,同时也由于对莫雷的实验逻辑不理解,其批评是难以成立的。

关键词: 样例, 表面概貌, 原理运用, 原理通达

Abstract: This paper analyzed the two researches made by Ross on the influence of superficial similarities between examples and test items both on the access and the use of principles and the research made by Mo Lei in 2000 which turned down the conclusion made by Ross that superficial story line had no influence on the use of principle. It was pointed out that the research made by Mo in 2000 had thorough foundation. According to the design and the results of Mo’s experiment, it could be concluded logically that the superficial story line could influence the use of principles. It was just because the author didn’t know the basic design logic of psychological experiment and didn’t comprehend the design logic of Mo’s experiment that the paper by Shao Guanghua raised the criticism of Mo’s research. And this criticism was groundless.

Key words: example, superficial story line, correspondence of objects, access of principle, use of principles

中图分类号: