ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办：中国心理学会
　　　中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 1985, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 3-10.

• •    下一篇

再认性同一判断中汉字信息的提取

彭聃龄;郭德俊;张素兰   

  1. 北京师范大学 ,北京师范大学 ,北京师范大学
  • 发布日期:1985-09-25 出版日期:1985-09-25
  • 通讯作者: 彭聃龄

THE RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION OF CHINESE CHARACTERS IN MAKING SIMILARITY JUDGMENT UNDER RECOGNITION CONDITION

Peng Danling Guo Dejun Zhang Sulan(Beijing Normal University)   

  • Online:1985-09-25 Published:1985-09-25

摘要： 我们用Condry和Levy(1979)的实验方法,研究了在同一性判断中汉字信息的提取。实验中,大学生和小学生各30名在四种干扰条件(形似干扰、音近干扰、意同干扰和控制干扰)下,分别对汉字进行同一性判断(形似、音近、意同)。结果表明,大学生与小学生进行同一性判断的反应时,有明显的年龄差异;在同一年龄组内,形似判断的反应时最短,音近判断稍长.而意同判断最长。音近和意同的差别不显著。形似对意同判断的干扰,大于音近对意同判断的干扰。这说明,在现有的实验条件下,语音编码并不是提取意义的一个必不可少的阶段。这一结论是和神经心理学的某些发现一致的。

关键词: NULL

Abstract: Using the procedures provided by S. M. Condry and A. Levy (1979), we had 30 primary school pupils of the fifth grade and 30 college students to judge the graphic, phonetic or semantic similarities of Chinese characters under different distracting conditions such as their being similar in look, sound or meaning. The result shows that the differences between college students and schoolchildren in the reaction time of making similarity judgments are significant. The R. T in the same age group in making similarity judgement of characters that look similar is the shortest, with those similar in sound taking a longer RT, and the synonyms taking the longest. The RT difference between the second and third catagories are not significant. The result also shows that the distractive effect of graphic similarity on synonym judgement is greater than that of phonetic similarity. On the basis of these results, the authors hold that coding sound may not be a necessary step in assessing meaning. In addition to the graphic-phonetic-semantic channel in information processing of Chinese characters, the graphicsemantic channel must also be available.

Key words: NULL