Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2020, Vol. 52 Issue (3): 386-398    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00386
  理论与史 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索
苏佳佳1,叶浩生1,2()
1 广州大学教育学院, 广州 510006
2 广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心, 广州 510006
Exploring ideas of embodied psychology in Chinese Mythology
Jiajia SU1,Haosheng YE1,2()
1 Education School of Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2 The Center for the Psychology and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
全文: PDF(772 KB)   HTML 评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

西方“具身认知”心理学与赋存在中国文化里的以“天人合一”为核心的“体知”心理学思想息息相通, 而中国文化又有其独异于西方文化的“身体”智慧。文化的源头实为神话。追根溯源, 本文主要从具身认知的视阈中将中西方神话中“身体”的角色两相比照, 首先从本体论维度以现象学诠释的方法来描述神话的身体母体是如何生成的, 并以天地开辟神话、万物肇始神话和人类起源神话为例揭示中国“身体”的本体论特色—— 一元论; 其次再从空间维度以概念隐喻的理论来剖析神话的身体现象学场域是如何延展的, 并从物我同一角度、天人交感角度和人神相通角度来彰显中国“身体”的空间维度特色——气论; 最后再从时间维度以社会建构理论来解构神话的身体是如何在时间场域中流变的; 并从社会、文化和历史三个层面来表达中国“身体”的时间维度特色——易论。通过从中国神话故事中挖掘中国传统文化中独有的“具身智慧”, 以期为建立中国人自己的科学心理学起抛砖引玉之用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 具身认知中国神话中国心理学天人合一现象学    
Abstract

Which branch of science does psychology fall under? Does China practice psychology? How should China establish its own scientific discipline of psychology? These three questions urgently need to be resolved since the birth of psychology. With the current development of Western psychology, the rise of ‘embodied cognition’ has allowed us to foresee the greatest possibility of Chinese-Western psychological dialogue and the establishment of China’s own discipline of psychology. The ‘embodied cognition’ of Western psychology is closely related to the ‘body-knowing’ ideas existed in Chinese culture with the concept of ‘nature-human integration’ as the core, whereas Chinese culture has its own body elements that are different from the Western culture. The source of culture is indeed a myth. This study attempts to explore the ‘embodied wisdom’ of Chinese traditional culture from the visual threshold of Chinese myths. The objective is to make a sound basis for the comprehensive scientific orientation of psychology, contributing to the integration of psychology and establishment of China’s own scientific discipline of psychology.
On the basis of a purely embodied psychological position, this study is summarised in three parts. Firstly, from the ontological dimension, the phenomenological interpretation method is used to describe how a mythical body is generated, and the myth of world, things and human origin are used as the example to reveal the ontological characteristic of China’s ‘body’ (monism). Secondly, from the spatial dimension, theory of conceptual metaphor is used to analyse how the mythological body phenomenology field is extended, and the perspectives of things and human beings are one, nature and human beings are one and Gods and human beings are one demonstrate the spatial characteristic of China’s ‘body’ (theory of Qi). Finally, from the time dimension, social construction theory is used to deconstruct that how the mythical body is changed in the time field and from the three levels of social, cultural and history to express the time characteristic of China’s ‘body’ (theory of Yi).
Since the ancient times, Chinese culture and Western culture have been two different points, obviously. It is impossible naturally for Chinese people to produce ‘epistemology’ in the Western sense of ‘observing knowledge’, because the soil foundation of Chinese culture is ‘ontology’ (experiencing knowledge). China’s ‘monism’ emphasises that the body contains the soul, and the soul embodies the body, which means that the body and soul are perceived as one. From the perspective of Chinese creation myth, China’s ‘body’ can be viewed as the ‘Tao’, the body possesses the ‘power’ and the body also owns ‘will’. China’s Qi theory emphasises that the Qi is full of the three worlds, namely heaven, earth and human beings, hence, from the perspective of Chinese mythology, human beings are integrated with everything, human beings and nature share the same destiny and human beings and gods are connected. China’s Yi theory emphasises that change itself is constant, which due to the meaning of relations always outweighs the meaning of elements in Chinese philosophy. Thus, cultural imagery, social thinking and historical sense existed in China’s creation myth are also the result of the human body’s real-time construction. Inferred from ancient Chinese mythology, the Chinese people know that this world is based on the changing cosmic schema of the ‘body-human beings-things-gods’, which means that the ontological, spatial and temporal dimensions are all dissolved at the starting point of the body. Therefore, China’s ‘embodied psychology’ ideas pay attention to ‘nature-human integration’ in the sense of ontology. So, there is only one body clearly embodied in the world of Chinese traditional culture. Thus, we will no longer be able to judge Chinese psychological ideas under the standards of Western psychology.
In summary: (1) psychology should be a unified study that combines natural and humanities science, in which the potential representative is embodied cognition; (2) the integration path of psychology must draw on the wisdom of embodied ideas of psychology that have existed in ancient Chinese culture, especially in the root of the Chinese mythology; (3) China must combine the creative transformation of Chinese and Western embodied psychology to establish the discipline of Chinese scientific psychology.

Key wordsembodied cognition    Chinese mythology    Chinese psychology    nature-human integration    phenomenology
收稿日期: 2019-07-18      出版日期: 2020-01-18
中图分类号:  B84-09  
基金资助:* 国家社会科学基金青年基金(全国教育科学规划)(CBA140143)
通讯作者: 叶浩生     E-mail: yehaosheng0817@163.com
引用本文:   
苏佳佳,叶浩生. (2020). 中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索. 心理学报, 52(3): 386-398.
Jiajia SU,Haosheng YE. (2020). Exploring ideas of embodied psychology in Chinese Mythology. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(3), 386-398.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00386      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2020/V52/I3/386
[1] An W. L. (1990). Kojiki (Z. R. Zhou, Trans.). Beijing: International Culture Publishing Company.
[1] [ 安万侣 . (1990). 古事记 (周作人译). 北京: 国际文化出版公司.]
[2] Ardila R . (2006). The experimental synthesis of behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 41(6), 462-467.
[3] Carl J . (1986). Analytical psychology and the art of poetry (G. L. Hou, & W. Gu, Trans.). Research in Literary Theory,(5), 72-80.
[3] [ 卡尔·荣格 . (1986). 分析心理学与诗的艺术(侯国良, 顾闻译). 文艺理论研究, (5), 72-80.]
[4] Croce . (1982). Theory and practice of history. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[4] [ 克罗齐 . (1982). 历史学的理论和实际. 北京: 商务印书馆.]
[5] Cui G. H., & Chen W . (2011). Beyond two culture: Third culture and the transform of current psychology. Psychological Exploration, 31(6), 483-488.
[6] [ 崔光辉, 陈巍 . (2011). 超越两种文化:第三种文化与变革中的当代心理学. 心理学探新, 31(6), 483-488.]
[7] David L. H., & Roger T. A . (1999). The cultural source of Chinese philosophical thinking. Jiangsu: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.
[7] [ 郝大维, 安乐哲 . (1999). 汉哲学思维的文化探源. 江苏: 江苏人民出版社.]
[8] Deng Q. Y. (2005). The thinking structure of Chinese mythology. Chongqing: Chongqing Press.
[8] [ 邓启耀 . (2005). 中国神话的思维结构. 重庆: 重庆出版社.
[9] Deng X. M . (1996). Husserl’s phenomenological guide. Zhongzhou Academic Journal,(6), 65-70.
[9] [ 邓晓芒 . (1996). 胡塞尔现象学导引. 中州学刊, (6), 65-70.]
[10] Du W. M. (2002). Du Weiming’s anthology (Vol. 5 ). Wuhan: Wuhan Publishing House.
[10] [ 杜维明 . (2002). 杜维明文集(第五卷). 武汉: 武汉出版社.
[11] Ernst C. . (2013). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
[11] [ 恩斯特·卡西尔 . (2013). 人论: 人类文化哲学导引. 上海: 上海译文出版社.]
[12] Fei D. Y . (2010). The evidence-based research on embodied cognition. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology, 27(1), 15-20.
[12] [ 费多益 . (2010). 寓身认知理论的循证研究. 科学技术哲学研究, 27(1), 15-20.]
[13] Fei X. T. (2008). From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
[13] [ 费孝通 . (2008). 乡土中国. 北京: 人民出版社.]
[14] Feng Y. L. (2004). A brief history of Chinese philosophy: Illustration collection. Beijing: New World Press.
[14] [ 冯友兰 . (2004). 中国哲学简史: 插图珍藏本. 北京: 新世界出版社.]
[15] Gadamer . (2004). Truth and method (H. D. Hong, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
[15] [ 加达默尔 . (2004). 真理与方法 (洪汉鼎译). 上海: 上海译文出版社.]
[16] Gao J. F . (1985). Objects and categories of Chinese psychology history. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),(1), 76-82.
[16] [ 高觉敷 . (1985). 中国心理学史的对象和范畴. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (1), 76-82.]
[17] Gergen K. J . (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266-275.
[18] Gu J. G. (1982). With Mr. Qian Xuantong on ancient history books. In Debate on ancient history (the first). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Publishing House.
[18] [ 顾颉刚 . (1982). 与钱玄同先生论古史书. 见顾颉刚. 古史辨一. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.]
[19] Hedden T., Ketay S., Aron A., Markus H. R., & Gabrieli J. D. E . (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 12-17.
[20] Heidegger . (2006). Sein und zeit. (J. Y. Chen, & Q. J. Wang, Trans.). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Bookstore.
[20] [ 海德格尔 . (2006). 存在与时间. 陈嘉映, 王庆节译. 北京: 三联书店.]
[21] He J . (2014). Three approaches to embodied cognition. Journal of East China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 46(06), 53-59.
[21] [ 何静 . (2014). 具身认知研究的三种进路. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 46(06), 53-59.]
[22] Huang G. G . (2014). Get ready for the third wave of psychology development. Psychological Exploration, 34(1), 7-10.
[22] [ 黄光国 . (2014). 迎接心理学发展的第三波. 心理学探新, 34(1), 7-10.]
[23] Huang J. J . (2006). Four “body” in the Confucianist thoughts of East Asia: Types and issues. Confucius Research,(5), 20-35.
[23] [ 黄俊杰 . (2006). 东亚儒家思想传统中的四种“身体”: 类型与议题. 孔子研究, (5), 20-35.]
[24] Huang L. X . (2004). To change with and adapt oneself to timeliness : An analysis on the idea of “time” in Zhou Yi. Studies of Zhou Yi,(4), 15-24.
[24] [ 黄黎星 . (2004). 与时偕行趣时变通《周易》“时”之观念析. 周易研究, (4), 15-24.]
[25] Jin C . (1986). A preliminary study on the ancient Chinese mythological ethics. Journal of Yangzhou University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition),(2), 76-79.
[25] [ 金城 . (1986). 中国古代神话伦理思想初探. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), (2), 76-79.]
[26] Kiverstein J . ( 2018). Extended cognition. In Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[27] Klaus H . (2003). World phenomenology. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Bookstore.
[27] [ 克劳斯·黑尔德 . (2003). 世界现象学. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店.]
[28] Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195-208.
[29] Li H. F., & Wang W . (2015). The design research on educational game based on the theory of embodied cognition——from EGEC frame construction to the development and application of “sanitation fighter”game. China Educational Technology,(5), 50-57.
[29] [ 李海峰, 王炜 . (2015). 基于具身认知理论的教育游戏设计研究——从EGEC框架构建到“环卫斗士” 游戏的开发与应用. 中国电化教育, (5), 50-57.]
[30] Li H. W., & Sheng X. M . (2006). Embodiment of cognition. Studies in Science of Science, 24(2), 184-190.
[30] [ 李恒威, 盛晓明 . (2006). 认知的具身化. 科学学研究, 24(2), 184-190.]
[31] Li Q. L . (2006). China’s body view and China’s issues — Comment on Zhou Yuchen’s “body: Thought and practice”. Philosophical Dynamics,(5), 21-27.
[31] [ 李清良 . (2006). 中国身体观与中国问题——兼评周与沉《身体: 思想与修行》. 哲学动态, (5), 21-27.]
[32] Li Q. W . (2008). Cognitive revolution and second generation cognitive science. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(12), 1306-1327.
[32] [ 李其维 . (2008). “认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议. 心理学报, 40(12), 1306-1327.]
[33] Li Q. W . (2019). The foundation of psychology: A meta- discussion on “psychological ontology” and related issues. Journal of Soochow University (Educational Science Edition).(03), 1-21.
[33] [ 李其维 . (2019). 心理学的立身之本——“心理本体”及心理学元问题的几点思考. 苏州大学学报(教育科学版), (03), 1-21.]
[34] Li X. D., & Ye H. S . (2015). Embodied cognition in ancient Chinese Confucianism and Taoism. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(5) , 702-710.
[34] [ 黎晓丹, 叶浩生 . (2015). 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观. 心理学报, 47(5), 702-710.]
[35] Li X. D., Du J. Z., & Ye H. S . (2016). Bidirectionality metaphorical effect of Chinese ritual culture: Contractive postures make people humble. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6), 746-756.
[35] [ 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生 . (2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48(6), 746-756.]
[36] Lu X . (1973). A brief history of Chinese fiction. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.
[36] [ 鲁迅 . (1973). 中国小说史略. 北京:
[37] Lu X . (1981). Collection of external collections. In Selected work of Luxun (Vol. 8). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
[37] [ 鲁迅 . (1981). 集外集拾遗补编. 见鲁迅全集(第八卷). 北京: 人民文学出版社.
[38] Lvy-Bruhl . (1981). Original thinking. (Ding. Y, Trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
[38] [ 列维·布留尔 . (1981). 原始思维. 丁由译. 北京: 商务印书馆.]
[39] Mao D . (1981). Mythological research. Tianjin: Baihua Literature and Art Publishing House.
[39] [ 茅盾 . (1981). 神话研究. 天津: 百花文艺出版社.]
[40] Mark J . (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
[41] Merleau-Ponty M. . (2001). Phenomenology of perception (Z. H. Jiang, Trans.). Beijing: The commercial Press.
[41] [ 梅洛·庞蒂 . (2001). 知觉现象学. 姜志辉译. 北京: 商务印书馆.]
[42] Meng P. Y. . (1993). Chinese philosophical subject thinking. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.
[42] [ 蒙培元 . (1993). 中国哲学主体思维. 北京: 人民出版社.]
[43] Miao X. Y., & Zhang C . (2018). Advanced and scientific labor — based people cultivation — a visual analysis of the key thoughts of embodied moral education based on knowledge mapping. Chinese Journal of Special Education,(3), 72-77.
[43] [ 苗小燕, 张冲 . (2018). “劳动树人”的科学性与先进性——基于知识图谱的具身德育核心观点可视化研究. 中国特殊教育, (3), 72-77.]
[44] Newen A., de Bruin L., & Gallagher S(Eds.) . (2018). The Oxford handbook of E cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[45] Pan S. . (1985). History of Chinese psychology. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
[45] [ 潘菽 . (1985). 中国心理学史. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[46] Qian X. T. (1982). Answering Mr. Gu Jiegang. In Debate on ancient history (the first). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Publishing House.
[46] [ 钱玄同 . (1982). 答顾颉刚先生书. 见顾颉刚. 古史辨一. 上海: 上海古籍出版社.]
[47] Shapiro L . (2019). Embodied cognition. London: Routledge.
[48] Soliman T., Gibson A., & Glenberg A. M . (2013). Sensory motor mechanisms unify psychology: The embodiment of culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(4), 885.
[49] Tao Y., & Zhong X . (1989). China creation myth. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
[49] [ 陶阳, 钟秀 . (1989). 中国创世神话. 上海: 上海人民出版社.
[50] Tang L. Q . (1990). Between Zhou Yi and Huai Dehai. Zhou Yi Studies,(2), 76-86.
[50] [ 唐力权 . (1990). 《周易》与怀德海之间. 周易研究, (2), 76-86.]
[51] Thompson E . (2001). Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 1-32.
[52] Токарев C. A., & Мелетинский Е. M . (1993). The myth of the world’s various nationalities. (Q. Z. Wei, Trans.). Beijing: International Cultural Publishing Company.
[52] [ 谢·亚·托卡列夫, 叶·莫·梅列金斯基 . (1993). 世界各民族神话大观. 魏庆征译. 北京: 国际文化出版公司.]
[53] Tomohisa I . (2009). On Lao Zhuang’s “nature”—also on the ideological development of Chinese philosophy “nature”. Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences), 23(6), 26-36.
[53] [ 池田知久 . (2009). 论老庄的“自然”——兼论中国哲学“自然”思想的发生与展开. 湖南大学学报(社会科学版), 23(6), 26-36.]
[54] Varela F., Thompson E., & Rosch E . (2010). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience (H W Li, H X Li & Q Wang, Trans) Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press Cognitive science and human experience (H. W. Li, H. X. Li & Q. Wang, Trans.). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
[54] [ F.瓦雷拉, E.汤普森, E.罗施 . (2010). 具身心智: 认知科学和人类经验 (李恒威, 李恒熙, 王球译). 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.]
[55] Wang F. Y., & Zheng H . (2006). Three issues on Chinese cultural psychology. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 51(6), 95-100.
[55] [ 汪凤炎, 郑红 . (2006). 关于中国文化心理学的三个问题. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 51(6), 95-100.]
[56] Wang H. Y . (2015). The logical principles of mythological phenomenology. Literary Review,(2), 41-49.
[56] [ 王怀义 . (2015). 神话现象学的逻辑原则. 文学评论, (2), 41-49.]
[57] Wang X. C . (2001). The philosophical explanation of Zhou Yi. Confucius Studies(6).
[57] [ 王新春 . (2001). 《周易》时的哲学发微. 孔子研究(6).]
[58] Wang Z. F . (2007). A phenomenological probe in time issue of I Ching. Academic Monthly, (#11), 87-93.
[58] [ 王振复 . (2007). 《周易》时间问题的现象学探问. 学术月刊, (11), 87-93.]
[59] Wei H., Duan H. C., & Zhou Z. K . (2018). Consumer behavior from the perspective of embodiment cognition. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(7), 1294-1306.
[59] [ 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎 . (2018). 具身认知视角下的消费者行为. 心理科学进展, 26(7), 1294-1306.]
[60] Wen Y. D. (1997). Myths and poems. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
[60] [ 闻一多 . (1997). 神话与诗. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[61] Wilson M . (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
[62] Wilson R. A., & Foglia L . (2015). Embodied cognition. In Zalta, E. N., Nodelman, U., & Allen, C.(ed). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Palo Alto CA: Stanford University.
[63] Wu B. A . (2009). Reflections on Chinese mythology for a hundred years (below). Forum on Folk Culture,(2), 5-15.
[63] [ 乌丙安 . (2009). 中国神话百年反思(下). 民间文化论坛, (2), 5-15.]
[64] Wu G. M . (1993). Zhuang-zi’s body thinking. In R. B. Yang (Ed.), The “Qi” and concept of body of ancient Chinese thought. Taipei: Sage Book Company.
[64] [ 吴光明 . (1993). 庄子的身体思维. 见杨儒宾 (编). 中国古代思想中的“气”论及身体观. 台北: 巨流图书公司.]
[65] Xie L. Y . (1990). Mythology ABC. Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore.
[65] [ 谢六逸 . (1990). 神话学ABC. 上海: 上海书店.]
[66] Yang K . (1982). Introduction to Chinese ancient history. In Debate on ancient history (the Seventh) (pp.65-405). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Publishing House.
[66] [ 杨宽 . (1982). 中国上古史导论. 见顾颉刚. 古史辨七 (pp.65-405). 上海: 上海古籍出版社.]
[67] Yang R. B . (1996). Body concept of Confucianism. Taipei: Academia Sinica Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy Preparatory Office.
[67] [ 杨儒宾 . (1996). 儒家身体观. 台北: 台北中央研究院中国文史哲研究所.]
[68] Yang Y. L., Yang W. X., Zhang M. L., & Si J. W . (2018). From numerosity representation to number representation: the acquisition of human numerical competence under embodied cognition perspective. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(1), 91-97.
[68] [ 杨雅琳, 杨伟星, 张明亮, 司继伟 . (2018). 从数量表征到数表征: 具身认知视角下的人类数能力获得. 心理科学, 41(1), 91-97.]
[69] Ye H. S . (2019). Enactive cognition: Theoretical rationale and practical approach. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(11), 1270-1280.
[69] [ 叶浩生 . (2019). 生成认知:理论基础与实践走向. 心理学报, 51(11), 1270-1280.]
[70] Ye S. X . (2010-08-12). Mythology as the prototype coding of Chinese culture——the myth view from the literary standard. Chinese Social Sciences Today,(12).
[70] [ 叶舒宪 . (2010-08-12). 神话作为中国文化的原型编码——走出文学本位的神话观. 中国社会科学报, (12).]
[71] Yuan K . (1998). Chinese myths and legends. Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House.
[71] [ 袁珂 . (1998). 中国神话传说. 北京: 人民文学出版社.
[72] Yuasa Y . Discussion on the body view of “Qi” in East Asian philosophy and science. In R. B. Yang (Ed.). (1997). The “Qi” and concept of body of ancient Chinese thought. Taipei: Sage Book Company.
[72] [ 汤浅泰雄 . “气之身体观”在东亚哲学与科学中的探讨. 见杨儒宾. (1997). 中国古代思想中的气论与身体观. 台北: 巨流图书公司.]
[73] Zhang B . (2016). Light and shadow in “embodied cognition”: Reconsideration of Chinese traditional cognition ideas. The Journal of Humanities,(10), 14-27.
[73] [ 张兵 . (2016). “具身认知”中的光与影: 中国传统认知思想复议. 人文杂志, (10), 14-27.]
[74] Zhang C. X . (2002). On the dilemma and outlet of psychological development. Journal of Psychological Science, 25(5), 591-596.
[74] [ 张春兴 . (2002). 论心理学发展的困境与出路. 心理科学, 25(5), 591-596.]
[75] Zhang F., Yuan X., & Lu W . (2019). Design of teaching situation in the practical teaching of sign language from the perspective of embodied cognition. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 38(5), 260-264.
[75] [ 张帆, 袁芯, 卢苇 . (2019). 具身认知视角下手语实训教学情境设计. 实验室研究与探索, 38(5), 260-264.]
[76] Zhang K. Y . (2014). A review of the research on the types of creation myths in China. Journal of Hubei Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 32(3), 1-6.
[76] [ 张开焱 . (2014). 中国创世神话类型研究述评. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 32(3), 1-6.]
[77] Zhang L. M . (2013). Research on the myth of body creation in the field of cultural anthropology. Forum on Folk Culture,(3), 30-39.
[77] [ 章立明 . (2013). 文化人类学视域中的身体创世神话研究. 民间文化论坛, (3), 30-39.]
[78] Zhang Z. L . (2005). Ancient Chinese philosophy as “body philosophy”. The Journal of Humanities,(2), 28-31.
[78] [ 张再林 . (2005). 作为“身体哲学”的中国古代哲学. 人文杂志, (2), 28-31.]
[79] Zhang Z. L . (2006). The body quality of the ancient Chinese cosmology. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 36(4), 10-17.
[79] [ 张再林 . (2006). 中国古代宇宙论的身体性. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 36(4), 10-17.]
[80] Zhang Z. L . (2007). “Human body philosophy” as the philosophical history of China. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 37(3), 52-63.
[80] [ 张再林 . (2007). 作为“身体哲学”的中国哲学的历史. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 37(3), 52-63.]
[81] Zhao P. L . (1995). Myths, history and figures of ancient history legends. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Social Science),(2), 53-60.
[81] [ 赵沛霖 . (1995). 神话、历史与古史传说人物. 天津师范大学学报(社科版), (2), 53-60.]
[82] Zhong J. W. (1992). In Ma, C. Y.(1994). Selected works of Chinese mythology (preface). Beijing: China Radio and Television Publishing House.
[82] [ 钟敬文 . (1992). 见马昌仪.(1994). 中国神话学文论选萃(序). 北京: 中国广播电视出版社.]
[1] 王汉林,蒋泽亮,冯晓慧,鲁忠义. 道德概念的空间形象性:语言因素和具身因素的共同作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 128-138.
[2] 叶浩生,曾红,杨文登. 生成认知:理论基础与实践走向[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1270-1280.
[3] 黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[4] 宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[5] 易仲怡,杨文登,叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[6] 叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登.  身体与认知表征:见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[7] 黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应:蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756.
[8] 刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[9] 苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动:一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506.
[10] 刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[11] 杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征:来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949.
[12] 黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.
[13] 唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政. 权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
[14] 叶浩生. “具身”涵义的理论辨析[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042.
[15] 李惠娟;张积家;张瑞芯. 上下意象图式对羌族亲属词认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 481-491.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn