1 School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience, Xi’an 710062, China 2 Students' Affairs Office, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
Joint action is a common phenomenon that involves two or more people cooperating together to achieve a common goal in our daily life. The action representation of co-actors play an important role in joint actions. Self-other integration, as a type of cognitive process, is the foundation of the joint action. Moreover, emotion can influence not only cognitive processes but also social interactions (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). Therefore, it is worthy to investigate whether different types of emotion play an important role in joint action. Three experiments were conducted in the present study to explore the influences of different dimensional of emotions on joint actions. A total of 48 participants were recruited in Experiment 1a to investigate the change of co-representation ability in joint action under conditions of high level of arousal with high/low level of valence. Joint Simon task was used to measure the ability of co-representation, and PANAS and Affect Grid were used to measure the level of emotional valence and arousal. In Experiment 1b, 48 participants were recruited to further explore the effect of low arousal with different valences on joint actions. In Experiment 2, another 48 participants were recruited to explore the effect of the dimension of motivation on joint actions under the condition of high arousal and high valence. The results of Experiment 1a showed that high arousal improved Joint Simon effect (JSE) significantly regardless of the valence, which indicated that high arousal played an important role in joint actions. Experiment 1b revealed that high valence played a compensating role under the condition of low arousal. The results of combined analyses of experiment 1a and 1b showed that high arousal could be a key factor in enhancing the ability of co-representation. Experiment 2 found that, only under the condition of low motivation, high arousal with high valence could significantly improve JSE. In conclusion, these results indicate that (1) high level of emotional arousal is the key factor in improving the ability of co-representation in joint actions regardless of the level of emotional valence; (2) high level of emotional valence played an compensating role under the condition of low level of arousal to maintain the level of co-representation; (3) the high arousal is not the determined factor in the enhancement of the co-representation and moderated by motivation intensity as well; and (4) When completing joint action, emotions adjusts the referential coding of co-actor through regulating range of attention so that influences the ability of co-representation, which further confirming the referential coding account.
Baron R. A . (1987). Effects of negative ions on interpersonal attraction: Evidence for intensification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 547-553.
Bedwell W. L., Pavlas D., Heyne K., Lazzara E. H., & Salas E . (2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43(6), 729-760.
Clore G. L., & Huntsinger J. R . (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1(1), 39-54.
Colzato L. S., de Bruijn E. R. A., & Hommel B . (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341.
Colzato L. S., Zech H., Hommel B., Verdonschot R., van den Wildenberg W. P. M., & Hsieh S . (2012). Loving-kindness brings loving-kindness: The impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(4), 541-545.
Corson Y., & Verrier N . (2007). Emotions and false memories: valence or arousal? Psychological Science, 18(3), 208-211.
Cunningham M. R . (1988). What do you do when you’re happy or blue? Mood, expectancies, and behavioral interest. Motivation and Emotion, 12(4), 309-331.
Desimone, R., Duncan J . (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
Dolk T., Hommel B., Colzato L. S., Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2011). How “social” is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2(84), 84.
Dolk T., Hommel B., Colzato L. S., Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2014). The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(974), 1-10.
Dolk T., Hommel B., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1248-1260.
Dunn J. R., & Schweitzer M. E . (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736-748.
Forgas J. P . (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 565-577.
Fredrickson B. L . (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Fredrickson B. L . (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91(4), 330-335.
Fredrickson B. L., & Branigan C . (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
Gable P. A., & Harmon-Jones E . (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 322-337.
Gilet A.-L., Jallais C . (2011). Valence, arousal, and word associations. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 740-746.
Heyes C . (2014). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131-143.
Hommel B . (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189-202.
Huang L., Yang T. Z., Ji Z. M . (2003). Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 54-56.
Jefferies L. N., Smilek D., Eich E., & Enns J. T . (2008). Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(3), 290-295.
Kandel E. R., Schwartz J. H., & Jessell T. M . (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kanske P., & Kotz S. A . (2010). Modulation of early conflict processing: N200 responses to emotional words in a flanker task. Neuropsychologia, 48(12), 3661-3664.
Kuhbandner C., & Zehetleitner M . (2011). Dissociable effects of valence and arousal in adaptive executive control. PLoS One, 6(12), e29287.
Kuhbandner C., Pekrun R., & Maier M. A . (2010). The role of positive and negative affect in the “mirroring” of other persons’ actions. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1182-1190.
Larson M. J., Gray A. C., Clayson P. E., Jones R., & Kirwan B. C . (2013). What are the influences of orthogonally-manipulated valence and arousal on performance monitoring processes? The effects of affective state. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 327-339.
Lazar J. N., & Pearlman-Avnion S . (2014). Effect of affect induction method on emotional valence and arousal. Psychology, 5(7), 595-601.
Liepelt R., Klempova B., Dolk T., Colzato L. S., Ragert P., Nitsche M. A., & Hommel B . (2016). The medial frontal cortex mediates self-other discrimination in the joint Simon task: A tDCS study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 30(3), 87-101.
Lyubomirsky S., King L., & Diener E . (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
Ma Q. G., & Shang Q . (2013). Modulation of emotion on Simon effect: An experimental study. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(2), 119-125.
Memelink J., & Hommel B . (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control . Psychological Research, 77(3), 249-259.
Porcu E., Bolling L., Lappe M., & Liepelt R . (2016). Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 972-977.
Rowe G., Hirsh J. B., & Anderson A. K . (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383-388.
Russell J. A., Weiss A., & Mendelsohn G. A . (1989). The affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502.
Schmitz T. W., de Rosa E., & Anderson A. K . (2009). Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7199-7207.
Sebanz N., Bekkering H., & Knoblich G . (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70-76.
Sebanz N., Knoblich G., & Prinz W . (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition, 88(3), B11-B21.
van Steenbergen H., Band G. P. H., Hommel B., Rombouts S. A. R. B., & Nieuwenhuis S . (2014). Hedonic hotspots regulate cingulate-driven adaptation to cognitive demands. Cerebral Cortex, 25(7), 1746-1756.
Vesper C., Abramova E., Bütepage J., Ciardo F., Crossey B., Effenberg A., … Wahn B . (2016). Joint action: Mental representations, shared information and general mechanisms for coordinating with others. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2039.
Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A . (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Waugh C. E., & Fredrickson B. L . (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 93-106.
Xu S., Song X. L . (2016). Joint Simon effect: Current research, influencing factors and theories. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(3), 367-378.