Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2019, Vol. 51 Issue (9): 982-991    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00982
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
感觉记忆中含语义对象的视觉表征
胡晶晶,徐昊骙(),曹立人()
浙江大学心理与科学行为系, 杭州 310028
Visual representation of items with semantic information in sensory memory
HU Jingjing,XU Haokui(),CAO Liren()
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
全文: PDF(873 KB)   HTML 评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要 

感觉记忆能够以特征形式构建对视觉对象表面信息的表征, 然而对于具有重要意义的潜在抽象信息, 尚未有研究考察其是否影响感觉记忆的视觉表征。结合掩蔽技术与部分报告法范式考察了感觉记忆的视觉表征中是否包含语义信息。以阿拉伯数字作为目标, 实验1与实验2分别采用正立与倒置的汉字大写数字作为掩蔽刺激, 比较其与白噪音刺激的掩蔽效应。结果显示, 汉字大写数字的掩蔽效应均强于白噪音刺激, 且正立汉字大写数字的掩蔽效果较倒置汉字大写数字更强。实验3采用汉字大写数字与汉字常用字分别作为掩蔽刺激, 结果显示汉字大写数字的掩蔽效果强于汉字常用字。上述结果显示, 刺激间的语义相似性带来了视觉表征冲突, 表明感觉记忆的视觉表征中包含了刺激的语义信息。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 感觉记忆视觉表征语义信息视觉掩蔽    
Abstract

Visual representation is one of the most important topics in sensory memory. Traditionally, visual representation with respect to sensory memory was regarded as an ‘icon’, the processing of which would cease after a subsequent stimulus (backward masking). Recently, an increasing number of researches have suggested a more flexible representation of visual sensory memory in which the features of the visual stimulus could be expressed in an abstract form. As previous researchers paid considerable attention to only the schematic features of a visual stimulus, the abstract information contained in a stimulus has rarely been explored. In this study, we have focused on the semantic information of the visual representation of the sensory memory. In a part-report task, the Arabic digits were employed as the target, and the Chinese digits as the semantic-similar mask, which were semantically related to Arabic digits; the noise patterns were employed as the non-semantic mask. If under the Chinese mask condition, the participants’ performance of reporting target digits decreased, it would reveal a conflict between the representations of the target and the mask, thereby suggesting that the visual representation of the sensory memory contains semantic information of the stimulus.

In Experiment 1, the target stimuli were arrays of 3×4 Arabic digits generated by selecting at random from a set containing digits zero to nine. A mask stimuli could either be (a) a single binary visual noise with an element size equal to the stroke width of the target digits, or (b) a 3×4 array of random standard Chinese-digits in capital form whose spatial arrangement is identical to that of the target and its size is big enough to overlap the corresponding target digits. Both the targets and masks were presented within 23.5 ms (2 frames in 85 Hz) and the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between the offset of the target and the onset of the mask was 105.9 ms (9 frames in 85 Hz). There were three conditions for reporting: part-report with 0 ms cue-delay, part-report with 447 ms cue-delay, and whole-report with no cue-delay. A correct response was recorded only when the participants reported the correct digits at the locations they occurred in the target array. The results showed a significant difference between the noise and standard Chinese-digit mask under all of the three reporting conditions; there was a significant part-report advantage for the noise mask, but not for the Chinese characters. This indicated that semantic information can influence information processing in the sensory memory. Considering that noise and Chinese characters are different at a schematic level, we inverted the Chinese digits in Experiment 2 to destroy their semantic information but reserve their schematic feature.

Therefore, Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, except the Chinese digits were inverted. The results showed that the difference between the noise and inverted Chinese-digit masks still existed, while both showed significant part-report advantages. We conducted an analysis across-experiment afterwards. There was a significant difference between the standard and inverted Chinese-digit masks, while there was no significant difference between the noise masks across the two experiments. Results above revealed that masks with different semantic information but the same schematic information can influence the target processing differently. Considering that the standard and inverted Chinese digits are different in semantic strength, we employed commonly used Chinese characters in Experiment 3 to ensure that the two masks under comparison have different meanings but a similar semantic strength.

In Experiment 3, we employed Chinese digits and commonly used Chinese characters as masks. These two masks had similar word frequencies and number of strokes. However, the Chinese-digit mask still showed a significant stronger masking effect, which revealed the effect of semantic similarity. This implied that the visual representation in sensory memory could contain semantic information.

In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the feature represented in sensory memory is not only schematic but also semantic. The functions of such a feature-based representation and its interaction with the icon have also been discussed.

Key wordssensory memory    visual representation    semantic information    masking
收稿日期: 2018-09-19      出版日期: 2019-07-24
中图分类号:  B842  
通讯作者: 徐昊骙,曹立人     E-mail: haokuixu.psy@gmail.com;caoliren2000@163.com
引用本文:   
胡晶晶,徐昊骙,曹立人. (2019). 感觉记忆中含语义对象的视觉表征. 心理学报, 51(9): 982-991.
HU Jingjing,XU Haokui,CAO Liren. (2019). Visual representation of items with semantic information in sensory memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(9), 982-991.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00982      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2019/V51/I9/982
1 Averbach E., &Coriell A.S. . ( 1961). Short-term memory in vision. The Bell System Technichal Jounarl.40( 1), 309-328.
2 Baker C. L., Jara-Ettinger J., Saxe R., & Tenenbaum J. B . ( 2017). Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires and percepts in human mentalizing. Nature Human Behaviour.1( 4), 1-10.
3 Bhardwaj R., Mollon J. D., & Smithson H. E . ( 2012). Compatibel and incompatible representation in visual sensory storage. Journal of Vision.12( 5), 1-10.
4 Brainard D.H . ( 1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision.10( 4), 433-436.
5 Coltheart M., Laming D. R. J., Routh D. A., & Broadbent D. E . ( 1983). Iconic memory [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.302( 1110), 283-294.
6 Dick A.O . ( 1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics.16( 3), 575-596.
7 Enns J.T., & Di Lollo V. , ( 2000). What’s new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences.4( 9), 345-352.
8 Federmeier K.D., & Kutas M. , ( 1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language.41( 4), 469-195.
9 Gegenfurtner K.R., & Sperling , ( 1993). Information transfer in iconic memory experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.19( 4), 845-866.
10 Haber R.N . ( 1983). The impending demise of the icon: A critique of the concept of iconic storage in visual information processing. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.6( 1), 1-54.
11 Jeffreys H. .( 1998). Theory of probability (3rd ed.).Oxford classic texts in the physical sciences. Oxford Oxfordshire, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
12 Kao C-H., Chen D-Y., & Chen C-C . ( 2010). The inversion effect in visual word form processing. Cortex.46( 2), 217-230.
13 Luck S.J., & Vogel ,E.K . ( 1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjuctions. Nature.390( 6657), 279-281.
14 Marr D (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, Oxford: Freeman.
15 Modern Chinese frequency dictionary (in Chinese).(1986). Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
16 [现代汉语频率词典.(1986). 北京: 北京语言学院出版社]
17 Neisser U. ( 1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.
18 Neri P., Luu J. Y.,& Levi D. M . ( 2006). Meaningful interactions can enhance visual discrimination of human agents. Nature Neuroscience.9( 9), 1186-1192.
19 ??men H, & Herzog, M.H . ( 2016). A new conceptualization of human visual sensory-memory. Frontiers in Psychology.7, 1-15.
20 Pelli D.G . ( 1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision.10( 4), 437-442.
21 Perfetti C.A., & Bell L. , ( 1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory and Language.30( 4), 473-485.
22 Perfetti C.A., & Zhang S. , ( 1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning.Memory, and Cognition.17( 4), 633-643.
23 Pinto Y., Sligte I. G., Shapiro K. L ., & Lamme, V. A. F ( 2013). Fragile visual short-term memory is an object-based and location-specific store. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.20( 4), 732-739.
24 Raymond J. E., Shapiro K. L., & Arnell K. M . ( 1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an rsvp task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.18( 3), 849-860.
25 Rensink R.A . ( 2002). Change detection. Annual Reviews of Psychology.53, 245-277.
26 Rescorla M . ( 2015). Bayesian perceptual psychology.M. Matthen (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception (First edition) (pp. 694-716). Oxford, New York NY: Oxford University Press.
27 Rouder J. N., Speckman P. L., Sun D. C., Morey R. D., & Iverson G . ( 2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.16( 2), 225-237.
28 Scheerer E. (1973). Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking. Psychologische Forschung.36( 1), 71-93.
29 Schlottmann A.& Ray E. , ( 2010). Goal attribution to schematic animals: Do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? Developmental Science.13( 1), 1-10.
30 Scholl B. J,& Gao T. .( 2013) Perceiving animacy and intentionality:Visual processing or higher-level judgment MD Rutherford & Valerie A Kuhlmeier (Eds) Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp197-230) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press Visual processing or higher-level judgment. M.D. Rutherford & Valerie A. Kuhlmeier (Eds). Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp.197-230). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
31 Schultz D.W., & Eriksen C.W, .( 1977). Do noise masks terminate target processing? Memory & Cognition.5( 1), 90-96.
32 Shen M. W., Gao T., & Ding H. J . (2004). A study of Chinese and Arabic numerals' subliminal priming effects. Journal of Psychological Science.27( 1), 13-17.
33 [ 沈模卫, 高涛, 丁海杰 . (2004). 汉字数字与阿拉伯数字的阈下启动研究. 心理科学, 27(1), 13-17.]
34 Shen M. W., Pan S., & Chen X . (1998). A study on the cognitive process of identification of two-radical Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology.4( 1), 27-32.
35 [ 沈模卫, 潘善会, 陈新 . ( 1998). 合体字字形识别过程探索. 应用心理学.4( 1), 27-32.]
36 Smithson H, & Mollon J. , ( 2006). Do masks terminate the icon? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.59( 1), 150-160.
37 Song X.C . ( 2017). Grouping functionally-related objects in working memory (Unpublished master's thesis).Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.
38 [ 宋旭晨 . ( 2017). 功能相关的客体在工作记忆中的组织 (硕士学位论文).浙江大学, 杭州.]
39 Sperling G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied.74( 11), 1-29.
40 Sperling G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors.5( 1), 19-31.
41 Tang N., An W., Xu H. K., Zhou J. F., Gao T., & Shen M. W . ( 2018). From "data" to "representation": How human cognition can inspire artificial intelligence. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology.24( 1), 3-14.
42 [ 唐宁, 安玮, 徐昊骙, 周吉帆, 高涛, 沈模卫 . ( 2018). 从数据到表征: 人类认知对人工智能的启发. 应用心理学.24( 1), 3-14.]
43 Turvey M.T . ( 1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review.80( 1), 1-52.
44 Wahn B.,& K?nig P. , ( 2017). Is attentional resource allocation across sensory modalities task-dependent? Advances in Cognitive Psychology.13( 1), 83-96.
45 Wolfe J. M., Butcher S. J., Lee C., & Hyle M . ( 2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.29(2), 483-502.
46 Wu F., Gu Q., Shi Z. H., Gao Z. F., & Shen M. W . ( 2018). Striding over the "classical statistical inference trap": Application of Bayes Factors in psychological studies. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology.24( 3), 195-202.
47 [ 吴凡, 顾全, 施壮华, 高在峰, 沈模卫 . ( 2018). 跳出传统假设检验方法的陷阱——贝叶斯因子在心理学研究领域的应用. 应用心理学.24( 3), 195-202.]
48 Yin J.& Csibra G. ,(2015). Concept-based word learning in human infants. Psychological Science.26( 8), 1316-1324.
49 Zerr P., Gayet S., Mulder K., Pinto Y., Sligte I& .,van der Stigchel S. (2017). Remapping high-capacity, pre-attentive, fragile sensory memory. Scientific Reports.7( 1), 1-10.
50 Zhou J. F., Xu H. K., Tang N., Shi B. H., Zhao Y., Gao T., & S hen M. W . ( 2016). The “strong-cognition" psychology research: Implication of AlphaGo. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology.22( 1), 3-11.
51 [ 周吉帆, 徐昊骙, 唐宁, 史博皓, 赵阳, 高涛, 沈模卫 . ( 2016). "强认知"的心理学研究: 来自AlphaGo的启示. 应用心理学.22( 1), 3-11.]
[1] 杨海波,刘和珺,章鹏,李量. 掩蔽刺激对目标识别加工的作用:来自fNIRS的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1187-1197.
[2] 唐溢;张智君;曾玫媚;黄可;刘炜;赵亚军. 基于名人面孔视觉特征和语义信息的视觉统计学习[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 837-850.
[3] 何立国,周爱保,郭田友,鲍旭辉. 任务信息通达对视觉表象眼动的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 910-923.
[4] 王穗苹,佟秀红,杨锦绵,冷英. 中文句子阅读中语义信息对眼动预视效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(03): 220-232.
[5] 刘淼,张必隐. 作文前计划的时间因素对前计划效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2000, 32(01): 70-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn