Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (3): 283-305    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00283
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 正念冥想对焦虑症状的干预: 效果及其影响因素元分析
 任志洪1,2;  张雅文1,3;  江光荣4
 (1福州大学人文社会科学学院应用心理学系, 福州 350108) (2 Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53704, USA) (3北京大学医学人文研究院医学心理系, 北京 100191) (4青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 华中师范大学心理学院, 湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室, 武汉 430079)
 Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in intervention for anxiety: A meta-analysis
 REN Zhihong1,2; Zhang Yawen1,3; JIANG Guangrong4
 (1 School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China) (2 Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53704, USA) (3 Institute of Medical Humanities, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China) (4 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; School of Psychology, Central China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China)
全文: PDF(1297 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  正念冥想对焦虑的干预效果结论不一, 系统考察其干预效果及影响因素, 有助于理解其作用机制, 并为正念冥想干预焦虑提供实践指导。本研究遵循PRISMA-Protocol, 运用元分析技术, 以即时效果与追踪效果为结果变量, 考察被试特征、干预特征、研究特征和结果分析4个方面(11个变量)的调节作用。通过数据库检索与筛选, 最终纳入东西方国家实证研究共55项(68个独立效应量, 4595名被试)。结果发现:正念冥想对焦虑干预的整体即时效果量达到显著的中等到大效果(g = 0.60), 但追踪效果不显著。单因素回归模型分析表明, 研究质量、国家地域、年龄、干预形式(团体练习vs.个体练习)、家庭练习与脱落率显著调节干预即时效果, 其中国家地域变量对效果量影响程度最大; 多元回归分析显示, 对照组类型、国家地域、练习经验、数据分析方式(ITT vs. PP)对干预效果存在调节作用; 此外, 国家地域与其他变量存在交互作用。后续研究需在研究质量、成本效益、不同焦虑类型及其他调节变量和提供客观评价指标上作改进。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
任志洪
张雅文
江光荣
关键词 正念冥想 焦虑 干预 调节作用 文化差异 元分析    
Abstract: Mindfulness meditation (MM) has enjoyed a growing popularity in healthcare in recent years when bio-psycho-social approaches are becoming more and more emphasized in modern medicine. There has been mounting empirical evidence showing MM’s significant effectiveness in alleviating anxiety for both nonclinical and clinical populations. However, the effect size of the available empirical investigation results has remained inconsistent and possible moderators have yet to be explored comprehensively. In order to determine the immediate and long-term efficacy of MM in overcoming anxiety, we conducted a meta-analysis based on a systematic and comprehensive review of the published studies on mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety. We also examined whether some characteristics of research participants (e.g. age, geographic areas) and interventions (e.g. format, duration, at-home practice), and specifics of the study (i.e. types of control, quality of the study) and data analysis (e.g. attrition rate) moderate the magnitude of the effectiveness of MM interventions (11variables). The review was performed following the rigorous PRISMA Protocol. Published studies using randomized controlled trial were selected from major databases worldwide to include investigations conducted in both Western and Eastern countries. Databases used include VIP Journal Integration Platform, Wan fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed. Keywords used are mindfulness, meditation, MBSR, MBCT, anxi*, mood, intervention, therapy, program. Using the random effect model, we pooled the effect size (Hedge’s g), and conducted a publication bias evaluation, a moderating effect analysis and an interaction analysis in CMA 3.3. Results of our analyses revealed fifty-five RCTs from both Eastern and Western countries (k = 68 samples, N = 4595 participants). Mindfulness meditation for treating anxiety is shown to be efficacious with a medium to large immediate effect (g = 0.60), but the effect is not reliably shown at follow-up assessments. The post-heterogeneity test result suggests that using the random effect model is reasonable. Univariate meta-regression analysis yielded that study quality, geographic areas, participants’ age, intervention format (Group vs. Individual), amount of at-home practice, and attrition rate shown in data analysis remarkably influenced the effect size of MM’s immediate effect, while types of control, health condition, mindfulness practice experience, intervention duration, or statistical analysis methods used (ITT vs. PP) did not appear to moderate MM’s immediate effectiveness for reducing anxiety. Additionally, geographic areas affect the effect size the most. Multiple meta-regression models suggested that type of control and geographic areas, as well as statistical analysis methods significantly moderate the effect size of intervention effectiveness. Overall, the study results demonstrated high immediate effect of mindfulness-based practices for alleviating anxiety, but the effect did not seem to last. In addition, geographic area turns out to be the strongest moderator, and practitioners in the East seem to benefit more than those who are in the West. Study quality, participants’ age, mindfulness practice experience, intervention format, at-home practice quantity and attrition rate also affect the effect size to a certain extent. Future research is warranted to improve methodological quality of outcome studies, to provide more clear and replicable evidence of MM efficacy, and to explore more underlying moderators for the intervention effect size, such as participant satisfaction and so forth.
Key wordsmindfulness meditation    anxiety    intervention    moderating effect    cultural differences    meta-analysis
收稿日期: 2017-03-29      出版日期: 2018-02-01
ZTFLH:     
  R395  
基金资助: 国家社科基金项目(16CSH051)资助。
通讯作者: 江光荣, E-mail: grjiang@yeah.net     E-mail: E-mail: grjiang@yeah.net
引用本文:   
任志洪, 张雅文, 江光荣.  正念冥想对焦虑症状的干预: 效果及其影响因素元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(3): 283-305.
REN Zhihong, Zhang Yawen, JIANG Guangrong.  Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation in intervention for anxiety: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 283-305.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00283      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I3/283
[1] 赵梦雪;冯正直;王毅超;赖薇;胡丰;刘可愚;夏凡;蒋娟;王佳;夏蕾. 1993~2013年常驻高海拔地区军人心理健康状态的横断历史研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 653-662.
[2] 周雅, 范方, 彭婷, 李媛媛, 龙可, 周洁莹, 梁颖欣.  NR3C1基因多态性及单倍型、父母教养方式 对青少年焦虑障碍的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(10): 1287-1301.
[3] 任志洪, 阮怡君, 赵庆柏, 张微, 赖丽足, 江光荣.  抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍治疗的神经心理机制 ——脑成像研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(10): 1302-1321.
[4] 于增艳;赵阿勐;刘爱书. 儿童期受虐经历与抑郁的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 40-49.
[5] 任志洪; 李献云; 赵陵波; 余香莲; 李政汉; 赖丽足; 阮怡君; 江光荣. 抑郁症网络化自助干预的效果及作用机制 ——以汉化MoodGYM为例[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 818-832.
[6] 张丽锦; 毕远; 梁熠; 刘敏红;. 小学一年级数感不良儿童的筛查与动态干预[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 804-817.
[7] 谢和平;王福兴;周宗奎;吴鹏. 多媒体学习中线索效应的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 540-555.
[8] 张淑华;刘兆延. 组织认同与离职意向关系的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1561-1573.
[9] 徐亮;区诵宜;郑希付;陈婷;冯彪;闫沛. 状态焦虑对条件性恐惧泛化的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1507-1518.
[10] 黄四林;侯佳伟;张梅;辛自强;张红川;孙铃;窦东徽. 中国农民工心理健康水平变迁的横断历史研究:1995~2011[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 466-477.
[11] 周文霞;谢宝国;辛迅;白光林:苗仁涛. 人力资本、社会资本和心理资本影响中国员工职业成功的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 251-263.
[12] 孙亚文;贺雯;罗俊龙. 随迁儿童元刻板印象威胁对工作记忆的影响:群际焦虑的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(11): 1349-1359.
[13] 吴鹏;刘华山. 道德推理与道德行为关系的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(8): 1192-1207.
[14] 夏瑞雪;周爱保;李世峰;徐科朋;任德云;朱婧. 观点采择在内隐情绪加工中的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(8): 1094-1102.
[15] 辛自强;韩玉蕾. 小学低年级儿童的等值分数概念发展及干预[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 791-806.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn