Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2018, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 197-205    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00197
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 条件性恐惧泛化的性别差异
 徐 亮1,2;  谢晓媛1,3,4;  闫 沛1,3,4;  李俊娇1,3,4;  郑希付1,3,4
 (1华南师范大学心理学院, 广州 510631) (2广东交通职业技术学院人文社科部, 广州 510650) (3华南师范大学心理应用研究中心; 4广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室, 广州 510631)
 Sex differences in fear generalization
 XU Liang1,2; XIE Xiaoyuan1,3,4; YAN Pei1,3,4; LI Junjiao1,3,4; ZHENG Xifu1,3,4
 (1 School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510630, China) (2 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangdong Communication Polytechnic, Guangzhou 510650, China) (3 Center for Studies of Psychological Application; 4 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, Guangzhou 510630, China)
全文: PDF(431 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  恐惧的过度泛化是焦虑障碍的核心症状之一, 表现为患者对与原危险刺激极不相似的中性刺激也有着较高强度的恐惧反应。临床上, 女性比男性更有可能患焦虑障碍, 因而对恐惧泛化进行性别差异研究可以为解释女性有着更高焦虑障碍发病率提供新的角度, 同时为临床治疗提供参考。本研究采用辨别性条件恐惧范式, 以主观预期值和皮电反应值作为测量指标, 从行为和生理两个层面对条件性恐惧泛化程度和恐惧泛化消退的性别差异进行研究。结果发现, 在恐惧泛化程度上, 未出现显著性别差异。在恐惧泛化消退上, 在主观预期值和皮电反应值两个层面均有着显著性别差异, 具体表现为相较于男性, 女性恐惧泛化的消退更慢, 持续时间更长。研究结果表明, 女性焦虑障碍高发病率的潜在影响因素之一可能在于女性对于恐惧泛化刺激的难以消除。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐 亮
谢晓媛
闫 沛
李俊娇
郑希付
关键词 恐惧泛化 泛化消退 性别差异    
Abstract: Women are more susceptible to disorders of fear and anxiety than men, with the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) two-to three-fold higher in women. Whereas normal fear responses are triggered by trauma-associated cues, in disorders such as PTSD, fear is also elicited in neutral or safe cues. Hence, fear over-generalization has been put forward as a potential etiological factor of PTSD and other anxiety disorders. Therefore, in this study, we examined whether women show stronger fear generalization than men, and are there any differences between women and man in the extinction of fear generalization. The answers to such questions could provide a new perspective on the severe prevalence of anxiety disorders in women. Forty-five college students participated in this study. Three participants’ data were deleted for technical failure, leaving forty-two participants’ (Female: 22, Male: 20) data in analysis finally. The experiment consisted of two phases: acquisition, and generalization. 10 rings of gradually increasing size were served as conditioned stimuli (CS) and generalization stimuli (GS). The rings in the two extreme sizes were as the conditioned danger cue (CS+) and conditioned safety cue (CS−), respectively. The eight intermediately sized rings were served as four classes of generalization stimuli (i.e., GS1, GS2, GS3, and GS4), with GS4 being the most similar one to CS+ in size. A 500ms-electric stimulus served as unconditioned stimulus (US). CS+ was probably paired with US, while CS− and GS were unpaired with US. During the experiment, US online expectancy ratings and skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded. The results showed that women had longer extinction duration of fear generalization than men, while there were no sex differences in generalization gradient. Such results were proved in the indexes of both online expectancy ratings and SCR. In the index of online expectancy ratings, both women and men generalized fear into GS3 and GS4. In the fear extinction of GS3, there were no sex difference and both genders extinguished generalized fear in Block3. As for GS4, women extinguished fear from Block5 while males were from Block3, which indicted that women need more time in generalization extinction. The conclusions above were also found in SCR. Both women and men transferred fear to GS4, but there had sex differences in the extinction of fear generalization. Men extinguished the fear of GS4 from Block3, while women were from Block4. The results of SCR also indicated that the women had longer extinction duration of fear generalization than men. The theory of behavioral inhibition was supported by this study, for the sex differences of fear generalization only occurring in generalization extinction but not generalization gradient. Given the role of fear generalization in anxiety disorders, our findings suggest that longer generalization extinction may contribute to the higher risk of anxiety disorders in women. Additionally, our findings also have potential value for treatments of anxiety disorders among women in clinical.
Key wordsfear generalization    generalization extinction    sex differences
收稿日期: 2017-03-31      出版日期: 2017-12-26
ZTFLH:  B845  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(31771218), 国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDB259), 幸福广州心理服务与辅导基地资助。
通讯作者: 郑希付, E-mail: zhengxf@scnu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
徐 亮, 谢晓媛, 闫 沛, 李俊娇, 郑希付.  条件性恐惧泛化的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(2): 197-205.
XU Liang, XIE Xiaoyuan, YAN Pei, LI Junjiao, ZHENG Xifu.  Sex differences in fear generalization. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 197-205.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00197      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2018/V50/I2/197
[1] 冯彪;徐亮;张蔚欣;陈婷;王文清;郑希付. 积极情绪对条件性恐惧泛化的抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 317-328.
[2] 曹衍淼;王美萍;曹丛;纪林芹;张文新. DRD2基因TaqIA多态性与同伴侵害对青少年早期抑郁的交互作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 28-39.
[3] 侯金芹;陈祉妍. 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 957-968.
[4] 蔡阿燕;杨洁敏;许爽;袁加锦. 表达抑制调节负性情绪的男性优势 ——来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 482-494.
[5] 徐亮;区诵宜;郑希付;陈婷;冯彪;闫沛. 状态焦虑对条件性恐惧泛化的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1507-1518.
[6] 王雨晴;姚鹏飞;周国梅. 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 108-118.
[7] 孙楠;郑希付. 条件性的关联学习和消退过程的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 507-515.
[8] 赵庆柏;张小菲;隋丹妮;周治金;陈其才;周宗奎. 局部表象产生中行为性别差异的神经基础[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 438-445.
[9] 刘俊升;周颖;李丹. 童年中晚期孤独感的发展轨迹:一项潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(2): 179-192.
[10] 徐丹妮;张佳悦;李先春. 面孔性别辨认中返回抑制效应的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(2): 161-168.
[11] 孙楠,魏艺铭,李倩,郑希付. 条件性恐惧记忆消退返回的性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(3): 314-321.
[12] 崔丽霞;史光远;张玉静;于园. 青少年抑郁综合认知模型及其性别差异[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1501-1514.
[13] 张晓. 童年早期社会能力的发展:一个潜变量增长模型[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(12): 1388-1397.
[14] 陈亮,张文新,纪林芹,陈光辉,魏星,常淑敏. 童年中晚期攻击的发展轨迹和性别差异:基于母亲报告的分析[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(06): 629-638.
[15] 田栋,徐晓虹,洪星,陈蕾,谢灵丹,李涛. 成年期双酚A暴露对小鼠行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(05): 534-543.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn