Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (10): 1277-1286    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01277
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 非熟练的韩国汉语学习者合成词加工中词优效应的特点
 陈 琳1;  钟罗金2;  冷 英3
 (1中山大学外国语学院, 广州 510275) (2华南师范大学基础教育培训与研究院, 广州 510631) (3南通大学教育科学学院, 南通 226019)
 Word superiority effect for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners
 CHEN Lin1; ZHONG Luojin2; LENG Ying3
 (1 School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China) (2 School of Professional Development and Research on Primary and Secondary Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China) (3 School of Education Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China)
全文: PDF(331 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  词优效应是语言学习中的一个普遍现象。关于英语母语者和汉语母语者的研究都发现了词优效应。本研究关注非熟练的韩国汉语学习者的中文词汇加工中的词优效应, 共两个实验:实验1考察汉字的频率对非熟练的韩国汉语学习者中文词汇加工中词优效应的影响; 实验2考察汉字和词之间的语义关系(词汇的结构)对非熟练的韩国汉语学习者中文词汇加工中词优效应的影响。实验1的结果发现, 字频并未对非熟练的韩国汉语学习者中文词汇加工中的词优效应产生影响, 非熟练的韩国汉语学习者在高频字和低频字的识别中都出现了词优效应, 且词优效应的大小没有显著差异。这说明非熟练的韩国汉语学习者在高、低频字的识别中都依赖于自上而下的词汇水平的激活。实验2的结果发现, 汉字和词之间的语义关系(词汇结构)影响词优效应, 相对于并列结构的词汇加工, 在偏正结构的词语加工中更容易出现词优效应。这个结果表明词汇的结构通过影响词水平和字水平之间的交互激活, 进而影响中文词汇加工中的词优效应。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈琳
钟罗金
冷英
关键词 词优效应 字频 并列结构 偏正结构 韩国汉语学习者    
Abstract: Studies of both low proficiency Thai-Chinese learners and Indonesian-Chinese learners have found that character in a real word was more easily recognized than that in a non-word regardless of character frequency. In this study, two experiments were designed to investigate how character frequency and the structure of Chinese compound word affected the word superiority effect for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners. 21 Korean-Chinese learners (12 male) and 36 Korean-Chinese learners (17 male) were enrolled in Experiment 1 and 2, respectively. The participants were defined as low proficiency CFL leaners, because they had passed the fourth level (the intermediate level with a vocabulary of 1200 words) of the Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK) but not the sixth (the highest level with a knowledge of 5000 words). The HSK is a standardized test of Chinese language proficiency for non-native speakers that distinguishes six levels of proficiency. Experiment 1 employed the classic Reicher-Wheeler forced choice decision paradigm. A two-character word (a real word or a non-word) was presented followed by two probe characters, participants were asked to select the probe character that had been in the word. The duration time of the word was determined by a self-adaptive procedure. The duration time range was from 40ms to 60 ms. By comparing character recognition accuracy in real words and non-words, we assessed the word superiority effect. By comparing the size of the word superiority effect for high and low frequency characters, we assessed the dependence of the word superiority effect on character frequency. In Experiment 2, character recognition accuracy of coordinative and subordinative words were compared to investigate the dependence of the word superiority on word structure. The paradigm of Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1 except that the duration of the word was restricted to 60 ms based on the average time of Experiment 1 and the task was changed to make a decision that the probe character was the initial or final character of the preceding word. There were significant differences of character recognition accuracy between the real word and non-word conditions. Character recognition accuracy in the real word condition was significantly higher than the non-word condition. The results verified there was a word superiority effect in Chinese word recognition for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners. Consistent with studies of Thai and Indonesian Chinese learners, the word superiority effect was not affected by character frequency. Experiment 2 found that there were significant differences on character recognition accuracy among coordinative word condition, subordinative word condition and non-word condition. Post-hoc analysis showed that there was a strong word superiority effect in the subordinative word condition while no word superiority effect was found in the coordinative word condition. The word superiority effect in Chinese word recognition indicated that character in a word was easily to be recognized for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners. In addition, the word superiority effect did not depend on character frequency. Low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners showed a strong word superiority effect for both low frequency and high frequency characters. Word structure affected word superiority effect. Word superiority effect was only found in subordinative word recognition.
Key words word superiority effect    character frequency    coordinative word    subordinative word    Korean-Chinese learners
收稿日期: 2017-01-03      出版日期: 2017-08-13
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
基金资助: 国家社科基金青年项目(15CYY020)资助。
通讯作者: 冷英, E-mail: lengying2003@126.com     E-mail: E-mail: lengying2003@126.com
引用本文:   
陈琳, 钟罗金, 冷英.  非熟练的韩国汉语学习者合成词加工中词优效应的特点[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(10): 1277-1286.
CHEN Lin, ZHONG Luojin, LENG Ying.  Word superiority effect for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1277-1286.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01277      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I10/1277
[1] 陈新葵,张积家. 义符熟悉性对低频形声字词汇通达的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 882-895.
[2] 蔡厚德,齐星亮,陈庆荣,钟元. 声旁位置对形声字命名规则性效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 868-881.
[3] 孙海静,王权红. 汉字模糊度、字频和语义启动在N400上的交互作用:N400的IA模型的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(6): 745-753.
[4] 刘聪慧,郭春彦,丁锦红,俞国良. 字频和预存表征对相继记忆效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(06): 662-670.
[5]

江新

. 汉字频率和构词数对非汉字圈学生汉字学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(04): 489-496.
[6] 张喆,韩布新,陈天勇. 两种呈现速度下整字及声旁命名[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(02): 178-182.
[7] 管益杰,方富熹. 单字词的学习年龄对小学生汉字识别的影响(Ⅱ)[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(01): 24-29.
[8] 管益杰,方富熹. 单字词的学习年龄对小学生汉字识别的影响(I)[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(05): 42-47.
[9] 陈传锋,黄希庭. 结构对称性汉字视觉识别特点的实验研究[J]. 心理学报, 1999, 31(02): 154-161.
[10] 彭聃龄,王春茂. 汉字加工的基本单元:来自笔画数效应和部件数效应的证据[J]. 心理学报, 1997, 29(01): 9-17.
[11] 喻柏林,曹河圻. 汉字识别中的笔画数效应新探——兼论字频效应[J]. 心理学报, 1992, 24(02): 10-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn