Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (9): 1219-1233    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01219
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 谦逊领导的影响机制和效应: 一个人际关系视角
 毛江华1;  廖建桥2;  韩 翼1;  刘文兴1
 (1中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 武汉 430073) (2华中科技大学管理学院, 武汉 430074)
 The mechanism and effect of leader humility: An interpersonal relationship perspective
 MAO Jianghua1; LIAO Jianqiao2; HAN Yi1; LIU Wenxing1
 (1 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China) (2 School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)
全文: PDF(561 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
摘要  谦逊是中华民族的传统美德, 然而, 现代社会的激烈竞争使得谦逊的有效性受到质疑。传统与现代观点的矛盾使得组织领导对是否表现谦逊以及如何表现谦逊产生疑问。本文基于人际关系视角, 探究谦逊领导对员工组织公民行为的影响效应, 以及在这个过程中下属归因的领导谦逊动机的作用。采用两阶段295份领导下属配对问卷调查, 结果表明在控制了领导成员交换关系之后, 谦逊领导通过提高与下属的关系亲近性促进下属的组织公民行为(建言和帮助行为)。同时, 当下属归因的领导谦逊印象管理动机高时, 谦逊领导的积极作用会被削弱。本文之后讨论了研究贡献以及未来的研究方向。
E-mail Alert
韩 翼
关键词 谦逊领导 关系亲近性 建言 帮助行为 归因的领导谦逊动机    
Abstract: Humility is a traditional virtue in China, however, the effectiveness of humility has been questioned in modern society. For example, by expressing humility, one’s strength and contribution may not be recognized by others. Although the traditional view requires us to show humility, however, the modern view indicates that if someone expresses humility, he/she may not get deserved reputation. Meanwhile, sometimes followers may regard leaders’ humbleness as weakness because followers need powerful leaders to guide them. The paradox of traditional and modern views of humility raises leaders’ concern about whether and how to display humility in workplace. Based on interpersonal relationship perspective, this research aims to examine the effect of leader humility on employee organizational citizenship behavior, as well as the role of inferred leader humility motives during this process. Instead of focusing on the formal relationship between leader and follower, we proposed that humble leaders would be more attractive to followers and would be easier to form a good interpersonal relationship with followers. Meanwhile, we proposed that when followers inferred different motives of leader-expressed humility, the positive relationship between leader humility and relational closeness would be weakened or strengthened. In order to test our hypothesized model, we conducted a time-lagged leader-member matching questionnaire design. Our sample came from 13 big companies located in Wuhan or Xiangyang, which resulted in 295 leader-followers dyads. To reducing common method bias, leader humility, inferred leader humility motives and demographic variables was measured in time 1. 7 weeks later, we measured relational closeness and LMX from followers and we measured voice behavior and helping behavior from leaders. Because leader humility was embedded in teams, we used hierarchical linear regression to analysis the data. Meanwhile, to test the indirect effect of relational closeness in relationship between leader humility and employee organizational citizenship behavior, bootstrapping method was also adopted. Results showed that: (1) after controlling leader-member exchange, leader humility was positively related to relational closeness. (2) Leader humility could enhance followers’ voice and helping behavior. (3) Relational closeness mediated the relationship between leader humility and followers’ voice and helping behavior. (4) When follower inferred leader humility’s impression management motive was high, the positive relationship between leader humility and relational closeness would be weakened. However, the moderation effect of follower inferred leader humility performance enhancement motives on relationship between leader humility and relational closeness was not significant. The present research makes several contributions to leader humility literature. By examining the positive effect of leader humility on follower OCB, this research proves the effectiveness of leader humility further. Moreover, this study confirmed the mediating role of relational closeness as well as its boundary conditions. As to the practical implications, this research suggested that leaders could show more humility in workplace to trigger followers to do more organizational citizenship behavior. However, at the same time, leaders should realize that if their humility was motivated by impression management, the positive effect of leader humility would be weakened.
Key words leader humility    relational closeness    voice    helping behavior    inferred motives of leader humility
收稿日期: 2016-07-17      出版日期: 2017-07-16
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(71502175和71402190)和国家社会科学基金(14BGL199)。
通讯作者: 毛江华, Email:     E-mail: Email:
毛江华, 廖建桥, 韩 翼, 刘文兴.  谦逊领导的影响机制和效应: 一个人际关系视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1219-1233.
MAO Jianghua, LIAO Jianqiao, HAN Yi, LIU Wenxing.  The mechanism and effect of leader humility: An interpersonal relationship perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1219-1233.
链接本文:      或
[1] 段锦云;施嘉逸;凌斌. 高承诺组织与员工建言:双过程模型检验[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 539-553.
[2] 刘蕴;李燕萍;涂乙冬. 员工为什么乐于助人?多层次的领导–部属交换对帮助行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(4): 385-397.
[3] 梁建. 道德领导与员工建言:一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 252-264.
[4] 段锦云,魏秋江. 建言效能感结构及其在员工建言行为发生中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(7): 972-985.
[5] 段锦云,凌斌. 中国背景下员工建言行为结构及中庸思维对其的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(10): 1185-1197.
[6] 李锐,凌文辁,柳士顺. 上司不当督导对下属建言行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(12): 1189-1202.
[7] 张爱卿,刘华山. 责任、情感及帮助行为的归因结构模型[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(04): 535-540.
[8] 林钟敏. 大学生对学习行为的责任归因[J]. 心理学报, 2001, 33(01): 37-42.
[9] 林钟敏. 从归因理论的角度探讨我国大学生的社会性评价[J]. 心理学报, 1993, 25(02): 45-53.
Full text



版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持