Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (7): 953-965    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00953
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 拖延行为的干预: 计划行为理论和实施意向的影响
林琳
 (中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100081)
 Integratin the theory of planned behavior and implementation intention to overcome procrastination
 LIN Lin
 (Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
全文: PDF(468 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  本研究以计划行为理论为理论框架, 通过实验操纵实施意向, 采用日记法进行为期5天的纵向追踪, 考察计划行为理论的4个核心变量和实施意向如何影响拖延行为的程度及其动态过程。134名大学生在前一周末共列举了接下来5个工作日内拟完成的668项学习相关任务, 随后每天报告当天的任务完成情况。多层线性模型分析结果表明: (1)行为意向中介态度和行为控制感对拖延程度的影响, 主观规范影响拖延程度的直接效应显著, 但经由行为意向的间接效应不显著; (2)形成实施意向能显著降低拖延程度; (3)行为控制感和实施意向加速任务完成进程, 行为控制感越强, 或形成实施意向, 均显著加快任务完成速度。研究结果对于如何进行拖延行为的干预有一定启示和借鉴。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林琳
关键词  拖延行为 实施意向 计划行为理论 准实验设计 日记法    
Abstract: Procrastination represents a behavioral tendency to delay beginning or completing a goal-directed action, which results in a gap between intention and behavior. While extant literature has predominately adopted cross-sectional designs to examine the antecedents of procrastination, the current study conducted a quasi- experiment to explore strategies to overcome procrastination by integrating the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and implementation intention. Furthermore, the study employed a daily dairy design to examine how these factors might influence the dynamic process of procrastination over time. One hundred and thirty-four undergraduate students participated in this two-stage study. All participants firstly filled in a general questionnaire to capture their demographic information and individual traits. One week later, on Sunday evening, they were asked to list five academic-related tasks that were assumed to be finished by the end of the upcoming week. Implementation intention was manipulated in which half of the participants were randomly assigned to experimental condition and were instructed to form implementation intention. The other half received no such instruction and served as the control group. In the following week, they were asked to report how much each task was achieved by the end of each day for five consecutive working days. Given the multilevel nature of the data where daily task completion (Level 1) was nested within task (Level 2), and task was further nested within individual (Level 3), hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) was used for hypothesis testing. Results of series of HLM models indicated that a) all the TPB variables were significantly related to academic procrastination. Specifically, participants procrastinated to a less extent when they had more positive attitude, perceived higher behavioral control, felt stronger subjective norm, and held stronger behavioral intention toward the completion of the task; b) behavioral intention mediated the effects of attitude and perceived behavioral control, but not subjective norm, on procrastination; c) implementation intention mitigated the degree of procrastination such that those instructed to form implementation intention completed higher percentage of planned tasks than their counterparts; d) both perceived behavioral control and implementation intention accelerated the process of task completion in that participants who had higher behavioral control or were instructed to explicitly form action plan were in a higher speed toward task completion. The current study provided empirical evidence that implementation intention manipulation may serve as an effective strategy to overcome procrastination. Specifically, forming implementation intention was effective not only in mitigating the degree of procrastination, but also in accelerating the rate of achieving goals. The potential mediating mechanisms through which implementation intention mitigated behavioral procrastination and accelerated the process of task completion were discussed.
Key words procrastination    implementation intention    the theory of planned behavior    quasi-experiment design    daily dairy method
收稿日期: 2016-06-14      出版日期: 2017-05-26
ZTFLH:     
  B849:C91  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71101156); 教育部人文社科青年基金项目(10YJC630138)资助。
通讯作者: 林琳, E-mail: linlin@cufe.edu.cn     E-mail: E-mail: linlin@cufe.edu.cn
引用本文:   
林琳.  拖延行为的干预: 计划行为理论和实施意向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 953-965.
LIN Lin.  Integratin the theory of planned behavior and implementation intention to overcome procrastination. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 953-965.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00953      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I7/953
[1] 白鹭, 毛伟宾, 王蕊, 张文海.  自然场景与身体动作对面孔表情识别的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1172-1183.
[2] 王燕, 侯博文, 李歆瑶, 李晓煦, 焦璐.  不同性别比和资源获取能力 对未婚男性择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1195-1205.
[3] 王沛, 谈晨皓, 崔诣晨.  我会在谁面前舍弃利益? ——博弈对象的能力与社会距离对名利 博弈倾向的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1206-1218.
[4] 毛江华, 廖建桥, 韩 翼, 刘文兴.  谦逊领导的影响机制和效应: 一个人际关系视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1219-1233.
[5] 杨睿娟, 游旭群.  对付出−回报失衡理论的推进——基于经济报酬对教师心理健康的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1184-1194.
[6] 李卫君, 张晶晶, 杨玉芳.  对比焦点的认知加工及其与重读的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1137-1149.
[7] 刘湍丽, 白学军.  部分线索对记忆提取的影响:认知抑制能力的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[8] 刘玥, 刘红云.  基于双因子模型的测验总分和 维度分的合成方法[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(9): 1234-1246.
[9] 王沛, 陈庆伟, 唐晓晨, 罗俊龙, 谈晨皓, 高凡.  中国人三重自我建构加工中的相对优先性: 来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1072-1079.
[10] 韩萌, 毛新瑞, 蔡梦彤, 贾茜, 郭春彦. 大小判断任务中正负号及其异同对 SNARC效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 995-1008.
[11] 沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林.  仁慈领导与员工创新行为:内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导−部属交换关系差异化的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1100-1112.
[12] 王海忠, 范孝雯, 欧阳建颖.  消费者自我构念、独特性需求与 品牌标识形状偏好[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1113-1124.
[13] 张豹, 胡岑楼, 陈颜璋, 缪素媚, 黄赛.  工作记忆与知觉负载对工作记忆表征 引导注意的调节[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[14] 章玉祉, 张积家.  义符启动范式下家族大小和类别一致性 对义符语义激活的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1041-1052.
[15] 付艺蕾, 罗跃嘉, 崔芳.  选择一致性影响结果评价的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn