Please wait a minute...
心理学报  2017, Vol. 49 Issue (7): 853-865    DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00853
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
 中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码 的过程特点:来自消失文本的证据
 刘志方1;  张智君2;  潘 运3;  仝 文4;  苏 衡2
 (1宁波大学心理学系暨研究所, 宁波 315211) (2浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 杭州 310028) (3贵州师范大学心理学系, 贵阳 550003) (4山西师范大学心理学系, 临汾 041004)
 The characteristics of visual word encoding in preview and fixation frames during Chinese reading: Evidences from disappearing text
 LIU Zhifang1; ZHANG Zhijun2; PAN Yun3; TONG Wen4; SU Heng2
 (1 College of Education, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) (2 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China) (4 Department of Psychology, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China)
全文: PDF(628 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
文章导读  
摘要  研究采用消失文本范式考察中文阅读中双字词汇视觉信息编码的过程特点。实验一操控词n+1上字词消失方式及其延迟时间, 结果发现, 注视词n时, 词n+1上不同位置的汉字及时消失(延迟时间为0 ms)都影响总阅读时间, 且影响程度与消失汉字的具体位置与消失汉字的数量有关; 延迟时间为60 ms时, 词n+1上的左侧字消失不再影响总阅读时间, 而词n+1上的右侧字消失仍会影响总阅读时间。实验二操控词n上字词消失方式及其延迟时间, 结果发现, 注视词n时, 词n上不同位置的汉字及时消失对总阅读时间的影响程度完全一致, 说明词n上汉字视觉编码不受消失汉字的具体位置与消失汉字的数量的调节; 延迟时间为60 ms时, 各消失条件都不影响总阅读时间, 说明词n上不同汉字的视觉编码同时完成。基于两项实验结果可得出, 在预视阶段内中文读者以汉字单元编码内双字词汇的视觉信息, 在注视阶段内以整词为单元编码双字词汇的视觉信息。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘志方
张智君
潘运
仝文
苏衡
关键词  中文阅读 视觉编码 消失文本范式 眼动    
Abstract: Encoding the visual information of text into a more permanent representation is necessary for text processing and comprehension. It was found that young English readers are able to encode all the visual information of a fixated word within 55 ms, but cannot encode word n+1 within this time in English reading. Evidence has shown that young Chinese adult readers could not only encapsulate a fixated word as soon as young adults English readers, but also encode the text of word n+1 within this time. It has also been found that the process of encoding a fixated word in Chinese reading is more susceptible to the effects of childhood development and age than English; thus, it may be language-related. With two disappearing text experiments, we explore the characteristics of text and visual encoding of words n and n+1 during Chinese reading. By doing so, we want to clarify whether the process of encoding visual information during Chinese reading is word-or character-based. If the encoding process is character-based, the impairment in reading performance from disappearing manipulations should be mediated by the number and locations of disappeared characters. On the contrary, a word-based hypothesis denies these results. The sentences used in both experiments consisted of 7 or 8 two-character words. The first experiment was conducted to explore the visual encoding in preview frames. The experiment was a 4 (disappearing manipulations: no disappearing vs word n+1 disappearing vs character n+1 disappearing vs character n+2 disappearing) ×2 (disappearing onset: 0 ms vs 60 ms) mixed design. After word n was fixated for 0 or 60 ms in each condition, word n+1, the left character of word n+1, and the right character of word n+1 disappeared respectively. An immediate refixation on word n did not result in the reappearance of disappeared text. Reading time was the most important reference in the present study. The results showed that the disruption caused by disappearing manipulations was mediated by the number and locations of disappeared characters; thus, indicating that the encoding process in preview frames is character-based during Chinese reading. The second experiment also had four disappearing manipulations and two disappearing onset times. This experiment was a 4 (disappearing manipulations: no disappearing vs word n disappearing vs fixated character disappearing vs no fixated character disappearing) × 2 (disappearing onset: 0 ms vs 60 ms) mixed design. In the word n disappearing condition, word n disappeared after it was fixated for 0 or 60 ms. In the fixated character disappearing condition, the fixated character disappeared after word n was fixated for 0 or 60 ms. In the no fixated character disappearing condition, the nonfixated character, which also belonged to word n, disappeared after word n was fixated for 0 or 60 ms. An immediate refixation on word n did not result in the reappearance of disappeared text. It was found that all of the disappearing manipulations disrupted reading performance equally when the disappearing onset time was 0 ms, and that not all of them prolonged reading time in the conditions with a 60 ms onset time. These results indicated that the encoding process in fixation frames is word-based during Chinese reading. By integrating the two results mentioned above, it may be concluded that Chinese readers encode the visual information of word n and characters in word n+1 parallel. Further, the encoding process is character-based in preview frames and word-based in fixation frames.
Key wordsChinese reading    visual encoding    disappearing text    eye movements
收稿日期: 2016-04-29      出版日期: 2017-05-26
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
基金资助: 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目成果(15YJC190014); 国家自然科学基金项目(31371039); 省教育科学规划课题(2015SCG103); 宁波大学人文社会科学培育项目研究成果
通讯作者: 张智君, E-mail: zjzhang@zju.edu.cn; 苏衡, E-mail: 1205428690@qq.com     E-mail: E-mail: zjzhang@zju.edu.cn; , E-mail: 1205428690@qq.com
引用本文:   
刘志方, 张智君, 潘运, 仝文, 苏衡.  中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码 的过程特点:来自消失文本的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 853-865.
LIU Zhifang, ZHANG Zhijun, PAN Yun, TONG Wen, SU Heng.  The characteristics of visual word encoding in preview and fixation frames during Chinese reading: Evidences from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 853-865.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00853      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I7/853
[1] 白学军;高晓雷;高蕾;王永胜. 藏语阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(5): 569-576.
[2] 梁菲菲;王永胜;杨文;白学军. 阅读水平调节儿童阅读眼动注视模式的发展:基于9~11岁儿童的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 450-459.
[3] 孙俊才; 石荣. 哭泣表情面孔的注意偏向:眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 155-163.
[4] 刘志方;张智君;杨桂芳. 中文阅读中的字词激活模式:来自提示词边界延时效应的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1082-1092.
[5] 苏衡;刘志方;曹立人. 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 625-636.
[6] 王福兴;侯秀娟;段朝辉;刘华山;李卉. 中国象棋经验棋手与新手的知觉差异:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 457-471.
[7] 王福兴;李文静;颜志强;段朝辉;李卉. 幼儿对威胁性刺激蛇的注意觉察:来自眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 774-786.
[8] 闫国利;刘妮娜;梁菲菲;刘志方;白学军. 中文读者词汇视觉信息获取速度的发展 ——来自消失文本的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(3): 300-318.
[9] 白学军;王永胜;郭志英;高晓雷;闫国利. 汉语阅读中词N+2的预视对高频词N+1 加工影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 143-156.
[10] 陈洁彬;鲁忠义. 路径转弯对语篇空间情境模型建构的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 176-189.
[11] 陈双;陈黎静;杨晓虹;杨玉芳. 语篇背景在语义整合中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 167-175.
[12] 王福兴;段朝辉;周宗奎;陈珺. 邻近效应对多媒体学习中图文整合的影响:线索的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 224-233.
[13] 徐建平;陈基越;张伟;李文雅;盛毓. 应聘者在人格测验中作假的反应过程:基于工作赞许性的眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(11): 1395-1404.
[14] 寇慧;苏艳华;罗小春;陈红. 相貌负面身体自我女性对相貌词的注意偏向眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(10): 1213-1222.
[15] 汪海彬;卢家楣;姚本先;桑青松;陈宁;唐晓晨. 职前教师情绪复杂性对情绪面孔加工的影响 ——来自行为、ERP和眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 50-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn