Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷的情绪特异性
杨海波1,2; 赵 欣1; 汪 洋1; 张 磊1; 王瑞萌1; 张 毅1; 王 力2
(1天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074) (2中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101)
The emotional specificity of executive function defects of earthquake PTSD teenagers
YANG Haibo1,2; ZHAO Xin1; WANG Yang1; ZHANG Lei1; WANG Ruimeng1; ZHANG Yi1; WANG Li2
(1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China) (2 CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
全文: PDF(403 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

已有研究表明PTSD青少年存在执行功能缺陷, 但尚不清楚这种缺陷是否具有情绪特异性。以2008年汶川地震重灾区汉旺中学PTSD、非PTSD以及非灾区青少年各28名为被试, 探讨震后PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷是否具有情绪特异性。实验1采用经典Stroop范式, 结果发现3组被试的Stroop效应量无显著差异; 实验2采用情绪Stroop范式, 结果发现PTSD组对地震信息的Stroop效应量显著大于非PTSD组和控制组。整个研究表明, 震后PTSD青少年的执行功能缺陷具有情绪特异性。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨海波
赵欣
汪洋
张磊
王瑞萌
张毅
王力
关键词 震后PTSD青少年 执行功能 Stroop任务 情绪Stroop任务    
Abstract

Previous studies have provided evidence regarding changes in executive function in adults and maltreated children with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, few studies have examined cognitive function in adolescents with PTSD related specifically to natural disasters. The goal of this current study is to assess the “cold” executive function and “hot” executive function in adolescents with PTSD after experiencing a magnitude 8.0 earthquake in Sichuan, China, 2008. Two experiments were designed to test our hypotheses. In study1, we investigated the “cold” executive function using the classic Stroop task. In study 2, the “hot” executive function was measured with the emotional Stroop task. The current research examined 947 junior high school students using PCL-5 questionnaires designed by trained psychiatrists. Results showed that 44 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) were diagnosed with PTSD after the Sichuan earthquake. The two tasks were administered to three groups of adolescents: (a) 28 PTSD adolescents (14 male, 14 female); (b) 28 non-PTSD adolescents exposed to the same earthquake (14 male, 14 female); (c) 28 healthy adolescents without earthquake experience (15 male, 13 female). In the classic Stroop task, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of mean reaction time (RT) only revealed a significant effect in congruent color words, indicating that the RTs of incongruent trials were significantly longer than those of congruent trials in all three groups. The Stroop effect on the PTSD group, non-PTSD group and the controlled teenagers showed no significant differences. The results proved that adolescents with PTSD performed similarly to non-PTSD and controlled teenagers in “cold” executive function in the classic Stroop task. In the emotional Stroop task, the ANOVA of mean RT revealed a significant interaction effect between group and word type. The simple effect test showed that the RTs of earthquake-related words of PTSD teenagers were significantly longer than those of positive words and neutral words, while the RTs of earthquake-related words of non-PTSD teenagers were significantly shorter than those of positive words and neutral words. There was no significant effect in the controlled group. In addition, the ANOVA of the emotional Stroop effect revealed a significant interaction effect between group and word type. The simple effect test showed that a more robust earthquake interference effect was obtained than positive words in the PTSD group, while the earthquake interference effect was inferior to the positive words for the non-PTSD group. Once again, there was no significant effect in the controlled group. As a result, the PTSD group performed more poorly in the emotional Stroop task compared with the non-PTSD group and controlled group, exhibiting defects in “hot” executive function. In summary, the current study suggests that adolescents with PTSD relating to a natural disaster have defects only in the emotional control domain of executive function compared with non-PTSD adolescents exposed to the same disaster, and adolescents with no exposure to earthquake experience at all. However, PTSD adolescents do perform well in generic executive function compared to both the non-PTSD and control group.

Key wordsPTSD adolescents of earthquake    executive function    the Stroop task    the emotional Stroop task
收稿日期: 2016-04-28      出版日期: 2017-05-25
基金资助:

中国科学院心理健康重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所)经费资助和天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJJX15-002)经费资助。

通讯作者: 王力, E-mail: wangli1@psych.ac.cn   
引用本文:   
杨海波;赵欣;汪洋;张磊;王瑞萌; 张毅;王力. PTSD青少年执行功能缺陷的情绪特异性[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00643.
YANG Haibo; ZHAO Xin; WANG Yang; ZHANG Lei; WANG Ruimeng; ZHANG Yi; WANG Li. The emotional specificity of executive function defects of earthquake PTSD teenagers. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 643-652.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00643      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I5/643
[1] 邢强, 孙海龙, 占丹玲, 胡婧, 刘凯.  执行功能对言语顿悟问题解决的影响: 基于行为与ERPs的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 909-919.
[2] 白学军;刘湍丽;沈德立. 部分线索效应的认知抑制过程:情绪Stroop任务证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 143-155.
[3] 吴彦文;游旭群;李海霞. 注意力资源限制与双任务的相互干扰机制[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(2): 174-184.
[4] 王岩;辛婷婷;刘兴华;张韵;卢焕华;翟彦斌. 正念训练的去自动化效应:Stroop和前瞻记忆任务证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(9): 1180-1188.
[5] 唐丹丹,刘培朵,陈安涛. 冲突观察能诱发冲突适应[J]. , 2012, 44(3): 295-303.
[6] 陈爱国,殷恒婵,颜军,杨钰. 不同强度短时有氧运动对执行功能的影响[J]. , 2011, 43(09): 1055-1062.
[7] 吴文婕, 张莉,冯廷勇,李红. 热执行功能对儿童标准窗口任务测试的影响 [J]. , 2008, 40(03): 319-326.
[8] 李一员,吴睿明,胡兴旺,李红,P ,D ,Zelaz.

聋童执行功能发展:聋童与正常儿童的比较

[J]. , 2006, 38(03): 356-364.
[9] 廖渝,吴睿明,Philip ,David ,Zelazo,李红,张婷,张莉,高山,李小晶. 意外地点任务中不同测试问题及意图理解与执行功能的关系[J]. , 2006, 38(02): 207-215.
[10]

张婷,吴睿明,李红,Philip ,David ,Zelazo,张莉,廖渝,李小晶

. 不同维度的执行功能与早期心理理论的关系[J]. , 2006, 38(01): 56-62.
[11] 魏勇刚,吴睿明,李红,冯廷勇,Philip David Zelazo. 抑制性控制在幼儿执行功能与心理理论中的作用[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 598-605.
[12] 陈天勇,李德明. 执行功能可分离性及与年龄关系的潜变量分析[J]. , 2005, 37(02): 210-217.
[13] 杨炯炯, ,翁旭初,管林初, ,匡培梓, ,张懋植, ,孙伟建,于生元5. 额叶在启动效应中的作用机制:对额叶损伤病人颜色命名和词命名任务的分析[J]. , 2003, 35(05): 610-616.
[14] 陈天勇,韩布新,王金凤. 工作记忆中央执行功能的特异性和可分离性[J]. , 2002, 34(06): 21-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn