Please wait a minute...
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
(武汉大学哲学学院, 武汉 430072)
The self-control process model of altruistic behavior: The positive effect of moral emotions under the ego depletion
FEI Dingzhou; QIAN Donghai; HUANG Xuchen
(Philosophy School of Wuhan university, Wuhan 430072, China)
全文: PDF(382 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

本研究通过3个实验验证和探讨了利他行为的自我控制过程模型。实验1采用自我损耗的双任务范式, 考察了自我损耗对利他行为水平的影响。实验2考察行动控制导向在自我损耗和利他行为之间关系的调节作用。实验3通过诱发道德情绪, 探讨了道德情绪对自我控制资源损耗个体的利他行为决策的作用。研究得到了以下结论:(1)自我控制资源损耗会对利他行为产生不利影响。(2)行动控制导向对自我损耗和利他行为之间的关系起调节作用。(3)道德情绪能够缓解自我损耗对利他行为的不利影响。

E-mail Alert
关键词 自我控制资源 利他行为 自我损耗 道德情绪 行动控制导向    

De Wall et al (2009) observed that helping others can be considered as a function of self-regulatory energy. It can be hypothesized that any factor affecting self-control is capable of having an impact on altruistic behavior. In the present paper, moral emotions are examined as one of these types of factors. We can anticipate that if a participants’ moral emotion is motivated even though they are in ego depletion, plus the regulation and moderation of action control, then the likelihood that they will help others is very great. In this study, three experiments were conducted. (1) The first experiment used dual-task paradigm to investigate participants’ performances in the dictator game task with exhausted self-control resources because of previous Stroop effect test. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures participants’ affects and its Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.872. (2) The second experiment investigated the moderation of action-control orientation between ego depletion and altruistic behavior. In this experiment the materials were the same as in the previous example, but also included a revised Chinese version of control action scale-decision sub scale with eleven items and a total of eleven points (action-orientation 5.5-11, state-orientation 0-5.5). The Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.7 for this experiment. (3) The third experiment explored the compensation of moral emotions for ego depletion in altruistic behavior using the behavioral memory paradigm. For the first experiment, the result suggests that the depletion of self-control resource caused by the Stroop task to be effective and the average number of tokens which the high depletion group of participants assigned to others was less than in the low depletion group. (2) The results of the second experiment showed that the main effect of variable action control was significant and group main effect was also significant. The interaction of two main effects was significant: F (1,54) = 4.51, p = 0.038 < 0.05, η2 = 0.077. The fact that the interaction effect was significant indicates regulation effect. (3) The third experiment showed that under the condition of high depletion, participants with positive moral emotions can assign more tokens to others, while ones with negative moral emotions assigned fewer tokens than the group of participants with positive moral emotions, but more than the neutral emotional group. There were significant differences in the amounts of tokens in the groups, F (1, 61) = 7.84, p = 0.001 < 0.01. We performed a multiple comparison analysis and found that in the amount of the allocation, there was a significant difference (p = 0.29 < 0.05) for positive moral emotions and moral negative emotion group; there was a very significant difference (p < 0.01) for positive moral emotion and neutral emotion group. The negative moral emotion and neutral emotion groups did not show a significant difference (p = 0.102 > 0.05), but the negative moral emotion group gave others a higher average amount of tokens than the neutral emotion group. This study explored the effect of self control resources on altruistic behavior, and addresses the compensation and positive role of moral emotions under ego depletion. This paper showed that inducing moral emotions can achieve this objective. The study suggests that personality differences in action control orientation can contribute to the research into rules governing the self control process and the study provides a theoretical basis for better prediction of altruistic behavior.

Key wordsself-control resource    altruistic behavior    ego depletion    moral emotions    action control
收稿日期: 2015-09-16      出版日期: 2016-09-25
通讯作者: 黄旭辰, E-mail:   
费定舟;钱东海;黄旭辰. 利他行为的自我控制过程模型:自我损耗下的道德情绪的正向作用[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01175.
FEI Dingzhou; QIAN Donghai; HUANG Xuchen. The self-control process model of altruistic behavior: The positive effect of moral emotions under the ego depletion. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1175-1183.
链接本文:      或
[1] 范伟; 钟毅平; 李慧云; 孟楚熠; 游畅; 傅小兰. 欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 845-856.
[2] 叶勇豪;许燕;朱一杰;梁炯潜;兰天;于淼. 网民对“人祸”事件的道德情绪特点——基于微博大数据研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 290-304.
[3] 肖二平;张积家;王娟. 摩梭走访制下的阿注关系:是亲属还是朋友?[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(12): 1486-1498.
[4] 任俊;李瑞雪;詹鋆;刘迪;林曼;彭年强. 好人可能做出坏行为的心理学解释 —— 基于自我控制资源损耗的研究证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 841-851.
[5] 窦凯;聂衍刚;王玉洁;黎建斌;沈汪兵. 自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1564-1579.
[6] 李丹;宗利娟;刘俊升. 外化行为问题与集体道德情绪、集体责任行为之关系:班级氛围的调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(9): 1015-1025.
[7] 凌文辁,杨海军,方俐洛. 企业员工的组织支持感[J]. , 2006, 38(02): 281-287.
Full text



版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持