Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经济地位和计量地位:社会地位比较对主观幸福感的影响及其年龄差异
黄婷婷1; 刘莉倩2; 王大华1; 张文海3
(1北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875) (2北京市工贸技师学院, 北京 100089) (3盐城工学院心理健康教育中心, 江苏盐城 224051)
Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-Being
HUANG Tingting1; LIU Liqian2; WANG Dahua1; ZHANG Wenhai3
(1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) (2 Beijing Industry and Trade Technicians College, Beijing 100089, China) (3 Centre for Mental Health Education, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 400715, China)
全文: PDF(536 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

采用麦克阿瑟梯子启动方法对个体的社会地位比较进行启动, 主要探讨社会经济地位和社会计量地位对年轻人和老年人主观幸福感作用的年龄差异。120名年轻人(27.26 ± 4.80岁)和120名老年人(65.12 ± 6.49岁)参加了正式实验。实验首先测量被试的主观幸福感, 3~7天后启动社会地位比较, 随后再次测量主观幸福感。社会地位比较分为4种启动条件, 即经济上行比较、经济下行比较、计量上行比较和计量下行比较, 被试被随机分配到其中一种启动条件。结果发现:年轻人的主观幸福感更容易受到社会经济地位比较的影响, 而老年人的主观幸福感更容易受到社会计量地位比较的影响。由于原有的等级评定方式并未验证启动的有效性, 补充实验通过对麦克阿瑟梯子进行改进降低了锚定化的影响, 为启动的有效性提供了直接的证据。本研究验证了主观幸福感悖论, 并从社会比较的角度解释了老年人维持主观幸福感的机制, 同时改进了麦克阿瑟梯子等级评定方法使其适用于中国情境。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄婷婷
刘莉倩
王大华
张文海
关键词 社会经济地位 社会计量地位 主观幸福感 社会比较老化    
Abstract

Social status refers to the position of an individual in the society, generally indicated by socioeconomic status (SES) or sociometric status (SMS). Despite growing research interest in examining relationships between SMS and SWB, only a few studies so far have directly compared the two types of social status with regard to their influences on SWB. Available work in the US has generally reported that SMS not SES has a positive impact on SWB among American samples. Given the economic and cultural differences between China and US, we proposed in the present study that both SES and SMS could be closely associated with an individual’s SWB among Chinese people. Furthermore, we proposed that SES might have stronger effects on young adults’ SWB, whereas SMS have stronger effects on older adults. This age-related hypothesis was grounded in the paradox of SWB with aging and the Social Selectivity Theory (SST). The paradox of SWB assumes that despite of deterioration with aging, older people report higher SWB compared with younger people. To interpret this paradox, SST maintains that individuals’ social motivation will gradually shift from knowledge acquirement to emotion regulation with age. Overall, the main purpose of this paper was to examine the impacts of the two types of social status on individuals’ SWB in a Chinese sample, while also testing age differences in this relationship. Participants were 120 young (aged 27.26 ± 4.80 years) and 120 older adults (aged 65.12 ± 6.49 years) from Beijing, China. Participants were firstly tested for baseline SWB and some covariates including neuroticism and extraversion. After a 3~7 day interval, participants were then allocated into one of the four conditions of social comparison, namely upward SES, downward SES, upward SMS, and downward SMS based on the MacArthur Ladder priming technique. Participants were asked to a) think of their important social networks and single out someone who has the highest or lowest SES (or SMS) among them; b) imagine this person at the very top/bottom rung of the ladder; c) place their own SES (or SMS) on one of the ladder rungs in comparison with the target person. After completing this grading on the ladder, their SWB were measured once again. An independent sampled t-test showed that there is no difference between young and older adults on the overall scores of baseline SWB (t (237) = 1.55, p = 0.12) while older adults reported higher life satisfaction than young adults (t (237) = 3.43, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.44), which is consistent with the assumption of the paradox of SWB. A three-way ANOVA (comparison direction × status type × age) showed that comparison direction had a significant main effect (F (1,229) = 133.01, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.37), whereas there was no interaction effect between comparison direction and status type, F (1, 229) = 0.20, p = 0.66. In other words, both SES and SMS have significant impacts on SWB. Most importantly, there existed a significant interaction between comparison direction, status type and age, F (1, 229) = 6.92, p < 0.01, η2p = 0.03. Post-hoc analysis indicated that SES had a stronger effect on younger people’s SWB under the downward comparison, whereas SMS had a stronger effect on older people’s SWB under the upward comparison. However, participants’ ladder grades under different comparison directions did not show differences (F (1,231) = 0.05, p = 0.82), which failed to validate the priming effect of the McArthur Ladder techniques. We attribute the failing validation to the insensitivity of the Ladder’s grading mode. In the supplementary experiment, we used a 10 cm-long-rectangle without any grading marks instead of the original graded ladder in order to eliminate the anchoring effects. The results showed a significant difference between upward and downward comparison, which proves that the modified grading mode is effective to identify the priming effects of McArthur Ladder, t (57) = -2.06, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.54. In conclusion, consistent with our hypotheses, we found that SWB can be affected by SES and SMS simultaneously, which suggests a cultural specificity in terms of the effects of social status on SWB. It is noteworthy that the present study confirmed the aging paradox of SWB, and shed a new light on the age-related differences in the impacts of social status on SWB. The findings demonstrate that SES has stronger effects on young adults, whereas SMS has stronger effects on older adults, which provides a reasonable interpretation for the paradox of SWB with aging from the perspective of social comparison. In addition, we have modified the grading mode of MacArthur Ladder so as to make it applicable among Chinese samples.

Key wordssocioeconomic status    sociometric status    subjective well-being    social comparison    aging
收稿日期: 2015-08-18      出版日期: 2016-09-25
基金资助:

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(310400078)。

通讯作者: 王大华, E-mail: wangdahua@bnu.edu.cn    
引用本文:   
黄婷婷; 刘莉倩;王大华;张文海. 经济地位和计量地位:社会地位比较对主观幸福感的影响及其年龄差异[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01163.
HUANG Tingting; LIU Liqian; WANG Dahua; ZHANG Wenhai. Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-Being. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1163-1174.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01163      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I9/1163
[1] 刘庆奇;牛更枫;范翠英;周宗奎. 被动性社交网站使用与自尊和自我概念清晰性:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 60-71.
[2] 牛更枫;孙晓军;周宗奎;孔繁昌;田媛. 基于QQ空间的社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较和自尊的序列中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1282-1291.
[3] 陈栩茜;张积家;朱云霞. 言语产生老化中的抑制损伤:来自不同任务的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(3): 329-343.
[4] 郑晓莹;彭泗清;彭璐珞. “达”则兼济天下?社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 243-250.
[5] 毛晓飞;彭华茂. 视知觉压力在基本心理能力老化中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 29-38.
[6] 窦炜;曲璐璐;曲琛. 社会比较对合作任务结果评价的影响:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(3): 405-414.
[7] 曾红,郭斯萍. “乐”——中国人的主观幸福感与传统文化中的幸福观[J]. , 2012, 44(7): 986-994.
[8] 刘盼,谢宁,吴艳红. 认知老化中有意控制对自动抑制的调节作用[J]. , 2010, 42(10): 981-987.
[9] Soledad Ballesteros and Julia Mayas. 保留的跨通道启动与老化:对于近期观点的总结[J]. , 2009, 41(11): 1063-1074.
[10] Lars Bä,ckman. 前临床期痴呆的认知特征:当前研究进展和未来研究展望[J]. , 2009, 41(11): 1040-1048.
[11] 彭华茂,王大华,申继亮,林崇德. 老年期语义理解能力与空间定向能力的交叉滞后分析[J]. , 2009, 41(07): 624-629.
[12] 蔡华俭,黄玄凤,宋海荣. 性别角色和主观幸福感的关系模型:基于中国大学生的检验[J]. , 2008, 40(04): 474-486.
[13] 陈作松,季浏. 身体锻炼对高中学生主观幸福感的影响及其心理机制 [J]. , 2006, 38(04): 562-575.
[14] 王大华,申继亮,彭华茂,唐丹,张凌. 教育水平对老年人认知能力的影响模式[J]. , 2005, 37(04): 511-516.
[15] 王大华,佟雁,周丽清,申继亮. 亲子支持对老年人主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. , 2004, 36(01): 78-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn