Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
童年压力及死亡威胁启动对择偶要求的影响
汪佳瑛1; 陈斌斌2
(1 Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 U.S.A.) (2复旦大学心理学系, 上海 200433)
The influence of childhood stress and mortality threat on mating standards
WANG Jiaying1; CHEN Bin-Bin2
(1 Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, U.S.A.) (2 Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
全文: PDF(395 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

本实验从生命史理论出发, 研究童年期环境压力如何与当前环境中的压力线索相互作用并影响个体对异性的择偶要求。被试为70名大学本科生, 其中一部分被试被分配到死亡威胁启动组, 他们阅读一篇描述近期国内暴力犯罪及死亡率上升的新闻报道, 另一部分被试被分配到控制组, 他们阅读一篇描述一个人花了很长时间寻找遗失钱包的文章。被试自我报告对异性的理想择偶要求及其童年压力。控制了性别及恋爱状态后, 多元回归分析表明:童年压力与启动条件仅在身体吸引力的理想标准上有显著交互作用。其中, 低童年压力组在死亡威胁启动下对异性身体吸引力的理想标准显著高于控制条件, 而高童年压力组在死亡威胁启动下对异性身体吸引力的理想要求则显著低于控制条件。此外, 启动条件在异性做“好父母”的择偶标准上有显著主效应, 死亡威胁启动下的被试对异性做好父母的择偶标准高于控制组被试。而在对资源的择偶标准上既不存在童年压力和死亡威胁启动的主效应, 也不存在交互作用。研究说明童年压力与当前环境压力会影响个体对异性的择偶要求, 但对不同择偶要求的影响作用不同。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
汪佳瑛
陈斌斌
关键词 死亡威胁 童年压力 择偶要求 生命史理论 进化心理学    
Abstract

Life history theory focuses on interpreting organisms’ trade-off in the allocation of limited resource. Research shows that the childhood stress influences an individual’s life history strategies. Based on previous literature, this experiment investigated the interaction effect of childhood stress and current environment stress on men’s and women’s mating standards. Participants were 70 Chinese undergraduate students (59 females, 11 males) with ages ranging from 17 to 23 (M = 19.37, SD = 1.16). In the mortality threat condition, participants were primed by reading a news article on the recent increases in random violence and mortality in the country. In the control condition, participants were asked to read a paper about a person spending hours searching for the lost key in an afternoon. The two passages were similar in length and style and elicited similar levels of general arousal. Mating standards and childhood stress were measured by self-report scales. A series of independent-sample t-test results showed that with regard to resource, women’s standard was higher than men’s and single participants had lower mating standard than those in a relationship. After controlling gender and relationship status, regression analysis showed that the interaction effect only existed on the mating standard for physical attractiveness. Specifically, the participants with higher childhood stress showed significantly lower mating standard for physical attractiveness in the mortality condition than in the control condition, whereas the participants with less childhood stress showed higher mating standard for physical attractiveness in the mortality condition than in the control condition. Further, the participants with mortality prime had higher standard for good parent than the ones in the control group. No main or interaction effects were found on the mating standard for resource. The results indicated that the childhood stress and cues to environmental harshness might influence the mating standards, but they might have different impact on different mating standards.

Key wordsmortality threat    childhood stress    mating standards    life history strategy    evolutionary psychology
收稿日期: 2015-07-03      出版日期: 2016-07-25
基金资助:

复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院科研基金资助。

通讯作者: 陈斌斌, E-mail: chenbinbin@fudan.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
汪佳瑛; 陈斌斌. 童年压力及死亡威胁启动对择偶要求的影响[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00857.
WANG Jiaying; CHEN Bin-Bin. The influence of childhood stress and mortality threat on mating standards. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 857-866.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00857      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I7/857
[1] 王 燕, 林镇超, 侯博文, 孙时进.  生命史权衡的内在机制:动机控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 783-793.
[2] 陆慧菁. 自我欺骗:通过欺骗自己更好地欺骗他人[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(9): 1265-1278.
[3] 刘肖岑,桑标,窦东徽. 人际/非人际情境下青少年外显与内隐的自我提升[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1293-1307.
[4] 蒋柯,熊哲宏. 利/害条件下归纳推理的心理效应分离[J]. , 2010, 42(11): 1050-1059.
[5] 王晓田. 投资决策进化心理学的研究:预期的私人资金分配和父母对子女的差异性精力投入[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 406-414.
[6] Irwin ,Silverman. 进化心理学概览[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 541-545.
[7] 张雷. 进化心理学的相关概念、理论与历史[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 556-570.
[8] Valerie ,G. ,Starratt,Todd ,K. ,Shackelford,Aaron ,T. ,Goetz,William ,F. ,McKibbin. 男性监控配偶、配偶不贞与精子竞争的关系[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 523-527.
[9] David ,M. ,Buss. 人类“性交往”的进化[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 502-512.
[10] 叶浩生. 有关进化心理学局限性的理论思考[J]. , 2006, 38(05): 784-790.
[11] 况志华,叶浩生. 当代西方心理学的三种新取向及其比较[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 702-709.
[12] 乐国安,陈浩,张彦彦. 进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验[J]. , 2005, 37(04): 561-568.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn