Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用
贾永萍1,3;周楚2;李林1;郭秀艳1
(1华东师范大学认知与心理学科学学院, 上海 200062) (2复旦大学心理学系, 上海 200433)
(3新疆师范大学教育科学学院, 乌鲁木齐 830054)
Recognition without cued recall (RWCR) phenomenon in Chinese characters: Effects of restudying and testing
JIA Yongping1,3; ZHOU Chu2; LI Lin1; GUO Xiuyan1
(1 School of psychology and Cognitive Science, East Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
(2 Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
(3 College of Educational Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China)
全文: PDF(459 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

采用无线索回忆再认范式, 对基于熟悉性的汉字语义特征再认进行了探索, 考察了重复学习和重复测验对汉字语义特征的无线索回忆再认效应(RWCR效应)的影响。实验1采用即时测验, 实验2采用延时测验, 结果发现:(1)无论即时还是延时测验, 汉字语义特征的再认均存在RWCR效应。(2)在即时测验时, 重复学习对熟悉性有显著影响, 重复测验对熟悉性没有影响; 重复学习和重复测验均提高回想成绩, 但二者无差异。(3)在延时测验时, 重复学习组和重复测验组的熟悉性评分均下降, 但前者下降快于后者; 重复测验组回想的遗忘率较低, 重复学习组回想的遗忘率较高。上述结果说明, 汉字的语义特征存在稳定的RWCR效应, 且重复学习主要影响熟悉性, 重复测验主要影响回想。进一步证明了再认记忆的双加工理论。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
贾永萍
周楚
李林
郭秀艳
关键词 RWCR效应熟悉性重复学习重复测验    
Abstract
Familiarity is thought to emerge when there is a match between the features currently presented and the features stored in memory, and it could be affected by both restudying and testing. It is still not clear whether all types of features can lead to familiarity. Though previous studies identified some types of features that could produce familiarity in the absence of recall, it is inconclusive as to whether semantic information gave rise to the familiarity feeling in recognition. No study has yet examined whether semantic features of Chinese can produce familiarity in the absence of recall. Furthermore, another open question remains as to whether the effects of testing and restudying on recollection and familiarity are dissociative.
The RWCR paradigm provides a quantitative way to explore above questions. RWCR refers to the phenomenon that even when participants are unable to recall a studied item when cued at test, they can still reliably discriminate between cues that resemble studied items and cues that do not. In this research, we explored the RWCR effect in Chinese characters learning, and used RWCR to examine the effectiveness of testing and restudying in recognition.
In Experiment 1, the final recognition test was taken immediately after the learning phase. A total of 60 college students were engaged in a 2 (Study Status: studied vs. nonstudied) × 2 (Study Strategy Type: testing vs. repeated study) mixed design experiment, to study different influences of testing and restudying on effectiveness of recollection and familiarity. In Experiment 2, 41 college students participated in a mixed design experiment. The procedure was identical to that of experiment 1, except that the final recognition test was taken one week after learning.
The results showed that (1) when the final test was taken immediately after the study phase, both restudying and testing lead to better recollection performance than the studying-once encoding did, and there was an advantage of restudy encoding over test encoding. (2) Restudy encoding led to better familiarity performance relative to testing and study-once encoding, and there was no difference between test encoding and studying-once encoding. (3) When the final test was delayed for one week, there was no difference in the recollection performance after either restudy encoding or test encoding. (4) Familiarity performance in restudy encoding condition declined faster than that in the test encoding condition. (5) The semantics of Chinese could elicit the RWCR effect.
The results demonstrated that the initial testing increased recollection relative to studying words once, whereas it did not affect familiarity. In addition, recognition tasks showed better familiarity on restudied words than on tested words, and test could enhance long-term retention of the tested material. Further, the semantics of word would also elicit the RWCR effect in logographically scripted language (i.e., Chinese).
Key wordsRWCR effect    familiarity    restudying    testing
收稿日期: 2015-03-30      出版日期: 2016-02-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(31271090, 71371180)、国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD106)、教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA190026)资助。

通讯作者: 周楚, E-mail: zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
贾永萍;周楚;李林;郭秀艳. 汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00111.
JIA Yongping; ZHOU Chu; LI Lin; GUO Xiuyan. Recognition without cued recall (RWCR) phenomenon in Chinese characters: Effects of restudying and testing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 111-120.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00111      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2016/V48/I2/111
[1] 毛新瑞;徐慧芳;郭春彦. 双加工再认提取中的情绪记忆增强效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1111-1123.
[2] 叶晓红;陈幼贞;孟迎芳. 回想、熟悉性与启动在编码过程的认知神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1101-1110.
[3] 陈莉;王沛;谢轶雯;张琴. 熟悉性和兼容性对复合社会范畴刻板印象表征的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(3): 375-388.
[4] 陈永香;朱莉琪. 影响动作图片命名的因素[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 11-18.
[5] 张积家,董昌锋. 范畴变量对虚假记忆的影响[J]. , 2006, 38(03): 324-332.
[6] 李寿欣,丁兆叶,张利增. 认知方式与线索特征对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. , 2005, 37(03): 320-327.
[7] 郝学芹,韩凯. FOK研究中一种新的标准测验——过度重复学习[J]. , 2002, 34(04): 32-36.
[8] 韩凯,沈大为,李波. FOK产生机制的再验证[J]. , 2001, 33(01): 13-16.
[9] 罗劲,林仲贤. FOK的线索熟悉性假说与线索熟悉性判断[J]. , 1999, 31(02): 121-127.
[10] 罗劲,林仲贤. 对FOK的线索熟悉性假说的重新检验[J]. , 1998, 30(03): 241-247.
[11] 韩松梅,朱滢. 再认的两种机制及其与启动效应的关系[J]. , 1995, 27(01): 9-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn