Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
“学-测经验”对前摄干扰监控及行为的修正作用
刘希平1;陈立青1;唐卫海1;白学军2
(1天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387) (2天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074)
Experience with Proactive Interference Diminishes Its Memory #br# Monitoring and Control
LIU Xiping1; CHEN Liqing1; TANG Weihai1; BAI Xuejun2
(1 School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)
(2 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
全文: PDF(437 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

先前的学习与记忆对后继学习项目的削弱作用, 称为前摄干扰。前摄干扰监控是指对前摄干扰造成的记忆成绩的削弱所进行的监督和调整。前摄干扰的监测偏差是指学习者对被干扰项目做出的监测判断比控制项目的判断等级高。研究考察“学-测经验”对前摄干扰监测、控制及干扰行为的修正作用。采用前摄干扰经典的A-B-D实验范式, 利用三个实验分别考察前摄干扰监测偏差是否存在; 考察增加“学-测经验”之后被试能否意识到前摄干扰的存在; 以及增加“学-测经验”之后被试是否可以对前摄干扰进行修正。结果发现:(1)被试对前摄干扰存在监测偏差, 且延迟判断的偏差更大。(2)在延迟判断条件下, 通过增加“学-测经验”, 可以修正监测偏差。(3)通过增加“学-测经验”, 被试可以自主调控学习过程; 用时较多的被试在自主调控学习过程之后能够完全克服前摄干扰。这一研究结果说明, “学-测经验”能够修正被试对前摄干扰的监控偏差; 而当给予被试充分的学习时间, 被试能够克服前摄干扰作用。研究为揭示前摄干扰的元记忆监控的规律、探索制约前摄干扰的因素及修正前摄干扰具有一定启示作用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘希平
陈立青
唐卫海
白学军
关键词 前摄干扰记忆监测记忆控制“学-测经验”时间分配    
Abstract

 

Proactive interference refers to the phenomena that learning and memory for previous items interfere with those for subsequent items. Previous studies have shown that there was a bias in participants’ proactive interference monitoring, but it is still unclear whether proactive interference can be reduced or overcome and how to eliminate the deviation of proactive interference monitoring.
The present study used three experiments to investigate whether learning- testing experience could improve the monitoring and control of proactive interference. 102 undergraduates with normal vision participated in this study. The sample sizes of Experiment 1, 2, and 3 were 40, 31, and 31 respectively. Experiment 1 examined whether the participants were able to realize proactive interference effect. The learning materials were divided into the control condition (A–B, C–D) and the interference condition (A–B, A–D). During the study phase, participants were asked to estimate their recall performances either immediately or after a delay. Experiment 2 examined whether the participants with learning- testing experience were aware of proactive interference. Participants were only asked to estimate their recall performances after a delay (delay-JoL condition only). Experiment 3 used a self-pace allocation study time procedure and showed that participants must have learning- testing experience with proactive interference to become aware of and reduce the effects of proactive interference.
In Experiment 1 and 2, memory accuracy and JoLs were recorded by E-prime, and in Experiment 3, the allocated time for each type of items and memory performance were recorded. Data was analyzed with SPSS 18.0. The results showed that: (1) The monitoring of proactive interference had a bias, which was greater in the delay judgment condition. (2) Learning- testing experience could reduce the monitoring bias in the delay judgment condition. (3) The participants with learning- testing experience allocated more attention to interference items during the second study round than the first one. (4) The participants spending more time in the second study round allocated more attention to interference items and thus overcome the proactive interference effect completely.

In conclusion, these results indicated that the learning- testing experience with proactive interference could enhance the awareness of its effects and allow individuals to adjust their learning and retrieval strategies in order to reduce the effects in a appropriate way.

Key wordsproactive interference    memory monitoring    memory control    learning - test experience    time allocating
收稿日期: 2014-05-19      出版日期: 2015-11-25
基金资助:

教育部人文社科研究基金(14YJA190007); 天津市哲学社科规划重点课题(TJJX13-002); 天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题(CE2016);天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划资助。

通讯作者: 刘希平, E-mail: lxp3771@sina.com   
引用本文:   
刘希平;陈立青;唐卫海;白学军. “学-测经验”对前摄干扰监控及行为的修正作用[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01328.
LIU Xiping; CHEN Liqing; TANG Weihai; BAI Xuejun. Experience with Proactive Interference Diminishes Its Memory #br# Monitoring and Control. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1328-1340.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01328      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I11/1328
[1] 姜英杰; 王志伟; 郑明玲; 金雪莲. 基于价值的议程对学习时间分配影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1229-1238.
[2] 唐卫海;刘湍丽;石英;冯虹;刘希平. 图片部分线索效应的学习时间分配的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 621-638.
[3] 符仲芳;孙洵伟;梁佩鹏. 情节记忆中的前摄干扰:神经心理药物学及计算认知建模研究[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 492-499.
[4] 陈功香, 张承芬,苏雅雯. 延迟学习判断的效应机制[J]. , 2010, 42(07): 743-753.
[5] 张雅明,俞国良. 学习不良儿童元记忆监测与控制的发展[J]. , 2007, 39(02): 249-256.
[6] 刘希平,方格. 不同任务定向下小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展[J]. , 2006, 38(06): 859-867.
[7] 刘希平,方格. 不同时间限制下小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展[J]. , 2006, 38(03): 365-374.
[8] 刘希平,方格. 小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 623-631.
[9] 周楚,刘晓明,张明. 学习困难儿童的元记忆监测与控制特点[J]. , 2004, 36(01): 65-70.
[10] 刘希平,唐卫海. 回忆准备就绪程度的判断发展[J]. , 2002, 34(01): 57-61.
[11] 刘希平. 回溯性监测判断与预见性监测判断发展的比较研究[J]. , 2001, 33(02): 137-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn