Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
任务类型对面孔联合效应和特征效应的调节
聂爱情;姜敬国;付乔;张瑞卿
(浙江大学心理与行为科学系, 杭州 310028)
The Conjunction Effect and Feature Effect in Faces Are Modulated by Task Type
NIE Aiqing; JIANG Jingguo; FU Qiao; ZHANG Ruiqing
(Department of Psychology and Behavior Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China)
全文: PDF(1833 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

采用特征-联合范式的研究发现, 面孔再认阶段可记录到明显的联合效应和特征效应; 然而, 与再认同属情景记忆的另一任务(来源提取)条件的相应效应尚未报道, 背景信息一致性对联合面孔和特征面孔提取的调节作用以及面孔不同特征对特征效应的影响也未考察。为澄清上述问题, 本文采用特征-联合范式, 并以位置为背景展开研究。实验含一个学习任务和两个测验任务(再认和来源提取)。结果显示, 再认和来源提取阶段均记录到显著的联合效应和特征效应, 且两类效应均在来源提取阶段更强; 任务类型与位置背景一致性交互影响提取绩效; 面孔外部特征和内部特征对特征效应的影响相似。表明联合效应和特征效应具有显著的任务类型敏感性, 这些效应是联合面孔和特征面孔的熟悉性较强且对源面孔的回忆加工相对较弱的结果, 且这两类面孔的提取为背景一致性所调节; 任务类型对两类效应的调节与双重加工理论模型相吻合。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
聂爱情
姜敬国
付乔
张瑞卿
关键词 联合效应特征效应任务类型再认来源提取面孔    
Abstract

Previous research has suggested that faces can produce robust conjunction and feature effects at item recognition in the feature-conjunction paradigm. However, whether such two effects are affected when the task and contextual details are manipulated, has not been described yet. Also, the contribution of external facial features versus internal facial features to feature effect needs further exploration. Thus, the first goal of the present study was to investigate to what extent that the two effects were affected by task type (the two aspects of episodic memory, i.e., item recognition and source retrieval) for unfamiliar faces in the feature-conjunction paradigm. The second goal was to explore the interaction between the consistency of presentation location and task type. Third, we would study the possible difference between external facial features and internal facial features in the case of feature effect. Thirty-one subjects participated in this experiment. The formal stimuli were 720 headshots of unfamiliar individuals, half male and half female. In the study stage, subjects were asked to learn some unfamiliar faces that were either presented on the left side or on the right side of the screen. In the test stage, five types of faces were displayed, left or right: old faces, conjunction faces, old external feature faces, old internal feature faces, and totally new faces; and two types of tasks were randomly presented: the item recognition task during which subjects only had to make old/new judgments, and the source retrieval task which required an additional discrimination towards the location of old faces (i.e., subjects were instructed to differentiate the old faces that were displayed on the same location between study and test from the old faces on different locations and other faces). The results showed that both tasks elicited robust conjunction effect and feature effect for faces, but they were larger in source retrieval task. The interaction between location consistency and task type was significant in terms of memory performance: At recognition, location consistency facilitated both effects, while no such facilitation was observed at source retrieval. The feature effect in old external faces was similar to that in internal feature faces. These results strongly demonstrate that both conjunction effect and feature effect are sensitive to task type, and suggests an important role of high familiarity compared with recollection in such two effects, consistent with the dual-process model. The discrimination of conjunction and feature faces is regulated by the interaction of whether the presentation location is consistent or not between study and test and task type. Additionally, old external facial features and old internal facial features play similar roles in the contribution to feature effect.

Key wordsconjunction effect    feature effect    task type    recognition    source retrieval    face
收稿日期: 2014-06-30      出版日期: 2015-05-25
基金资助:

浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY12C09003)、国家自然科学基金项目(31300831)、浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(13ZJQN036YB, 14NDJC012Z)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助。

通讯作者: 聂爱情, E-mail: nieaiq@126.com   
引用本文:   
聂爱情;姜敬国;付乔;张瑞卿. 任务类型对面孔联合效应和特征效应的调节[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00570.
NIE Aiqing; JIANG Jingguo; FU Qiao; ZHANG Ruiqing. The Conjunction Effect and Feature Effect in Faces Are Modulated by Task Type. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 570-583.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00570      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I5/570
[1] 孙俊才; 石荣. 哭泣表情面孔的注意偏向:眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 155-163.
[2] 李广政;王丽娟. SPT效应的自动突显机制:来自输出监测的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 238-247.
[3] 刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[4] 雷寰宇;魏柳青;吕创;张学民;闫晓倩. 多身份追踪中基于表情特征的分组效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 141-152.
[5] 钟毅平;李琎;占友龙;范伟;杨子鹿. 自我旋转面孔识别的ERPs研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1379-1389.
[6] 陈京军;许 磊; 程晓荣; 刘华山. 儿童汉字练习:纸笔手写与键盘拼音输入的效果比较[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1258-1269.
[7] 严璘璘;王哲;张智君;宋赛尉;孙宇浩. 知觉经验对面孔整体加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1199-1209.
[8] 毛新瑞;徐慧芳;郭春彦. 双加工再认提取中的情绪记忆增强效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1111-1123.
[9] 张丹丹;赵婷;柳昀哲;陈玉明. 恐惧情绪面孔和身体姿势加工的比较:事件相关电位研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 963-970.
[10] 唐溢;张智君;曾玫媚;黄可;刘炜;赵亚军. 基于名人面孔视觉特征和语义信息的视觉统计学习[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 837-850.
[11] 张美晨;魏萍;张钦. 阈上阈下不同面孔表情下的注视线索提示效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(11): 1309-1317.
[12] 吴彬星;张智君;孙雨生. 面孔熟悉度对面孔性别与表情相互作用的调节[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(10): 1201-1212.
[13] 王雨晴;姚鹏飞;周国梅. 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 108-118.
[14] 肖红蕊;黄一帆;龚先旻;王大华. 简化的联合再认范式中情绪对错误记忆影响的年龄差异[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 19-28.
[15] 严璘璘;王哲;李圆圆;钟鸣;孙宇浩;张智君. 知觉适应对种族融合面孔的种族分类和知觉辨别的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 1-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn