Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角
唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政
(广州大学教育学院; 广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心, 广州510006)
The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition
TANG Peipei; YE Haosheng; DU Jianzheng
(Educatioal College; Center for Mind and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
全文: PDF(405 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

通过3个实验考察权力概念的空间大小隐喻效应。实验1采用Stroop经典实验范式的变式, 考察了权力概念与空间大小维度具身的内隐关系; 实验2采用社会情境实验范式, 确认了在社会情境模式下, 空间大小对权力概念加工的影响; 实验3通过概念启动和知觉判断任务, 证实了抽象权力概念的加工对空间大小知觉的影响。通过研究得出以下主要结论:(1)权力与空间大小之间存在隐喻关系, 权力强的被知觉为空间上大的, 而权力弱的则被知觉为空间上小的。(2)权力空间大小隐喻效应具有双向性, 空间大小会影响权力概念的加工, 权力概念的加工也会影响到空间大小的知觉。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
唐佩佩
叶浩生
杜建政
关键词 概念隐喻具身认知空间隐喻大小图式权力    
Abstract

Metaphor is an important cognitive way for human to understand the world. It’s the main way for human to understand abstract concepts and abstract thinking. Body experience is the foundation of metaphor, through physical experience, human gained the initial concept category. Human achieve the understanding of abstract concepts by mapping it onto the abstract concepts through the isomorphic relation. The isomorphic relationship is the image-schema. It is a structure which builds on our daily physical experience constantly repeated. Humans have many image-schemas, such as "up-down" image-schema, "big-small" image-schema and so on. Through image-schemas, people can understand the abstract concepts by concrete experience. Spatial metaphor is the most common way of human cognition. Most human abstractions are understandings by spatial metaphors. The size is an important dimension of space, is also used to understand the different abstractions commonly. Such as positive vs negative, and importance vs unimportance. The metaphor effects are verified, but even though a lot of the linguistic materials proved the metaphorical relationship between space and power, but it’s still lack of psychological evidence. Based on this situation, current studies use psychological methods investigate the metaphorical effect of power and size systematically. The studies include three experiments: Experiment 1: Classic Stroop Paradigm Variant. Using reaction and correct as dependent variable to investigate the metaphorical effects between size and power. We select some words such as power or powerful, show them on the computer screen in different size, the big is 24, the small is 15. We ask the subjects to judge which one is powerful or powerless. We find out that the subjects judge quicker when the powerful show in big size and when the powerless show in small size; Experiment 2: using social situation paradigm and direct power rating index as dependent variable, further confirm the power and size metaphor. We give subjects some information about a manager, and the organization chart of the company. We ask the subjects to complete a scale about the power of the manager. We find that the manager will be perceived more powerful when the square is big which represent the manager; Experiment 3: through the priming of the power concepts first to investigate whether the cognition of power will influence the after area assessment. We show some words of powerful in the middle of one square as background, then ask the subjects to remember all of them, and estimate the size of the square and the circle. We find that the subjects which ask to remember and estimate the power words, the size is bigger than the subjects which ask to remember the powerless words. Conclusions: There is the metaphor of power and size. The powerful is perceived big, and the powerless is perceived small. When processing power activate “big-small” schema automatically, the schema associate information can influence the power cognition. Space is not only impact on the processing of power, but also affect the processing of power concepts relate to social information. Power and size metaphor has two-way effects. When processing the concept about power, it can be influenced by the spatial size, and also the concept of power processing can affect the perception of space area.

Key wordsconceptual metaphor    embodied cognition    spatial metaphor    “big-small&rdquo    image-schema    power
收稿日期: 2014-06-20      出版日期: 2015-04-25
基金资助:

广东省打造“理论粤军”2013度重大资助项目(LLYJ1323)。

通讯作者: 叶浩生, E-mail: yehaosheng0817@163.com 杜建政, E-mail: dujzh@126.com   
引用本文:   
唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政. 权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00514.
TANG Peipei; YE Haosheng; DU Jianzheng. The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00514      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I4/514
[1] 杨文琪;李强;郭名扬;范谦;何伊丽. 权力感对个体的影响:调节定向的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 404-415.
[2] 鲁忠义;贾利宁;翟冬雪. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 186-196.
[3] 汪新筱;严秀英;张积家;董方虹. 平辈亲属词语义加工中长幼概念的空间隐喻和重量隐喻——来自中国朝鲜族和汉族的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 174-185.
[4] 靳菲; 朱华伟;. 消费者的权力感与冲动购买[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 880-890.
[5] 黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应:蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756.
[6] 郑晓明; 刘鑫. 互动公平对员工幸福感的影响:心理授权的中介作用与权力距离的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 693-709.
[7] 陆欣欣;孙嘉卿. 领导−成员交换与情绪枯竭:互惠信念和权力距离导向的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.
[8] 刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[9] 陈欢;毕圣;庞隽. 权力感知对怀旧偏好的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1589-1599.
[10] 苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动:一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506.
[11] 容琰;隋杨; 杨百寅. 领导情绪智力对团队绩效和员工态度的影响——公平氛围和权力距离的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1152-1161.
[12] 刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[13] 杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征:来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949.
[14] 黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.
[15] 和秀梅;张夏妮;张积家;肖二平;王 娟. 文化图式影响亲属词语义加工中的空间隐喻 ——来自汉族人和摩梭人的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 584-599.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn