Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
记忆的生存加工优势是自然选择的结果:来自跨年龄比较和繁衍情境的证据
唐卫海1;谢斯1;刘玉霞1,2;白学军1,3;刘希平1
(1天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387) (2山东省潍坊市景芝镇党委, 山东 262119) (3天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074)
Survival-processing Memory Advantage Comes from Natural Selection: Evidence from Cross-age Comparison and Reproduction Scenarios
TANG Weihai1; XIE Si1; LIU Yuxia1,2; BAI Xuejun1,3; LIU Xiping1
(1 School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China) (2 Party Committee of Jingzhi Town, Weifang 262119, China) (3 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
全文: PDF(460 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

本研究考查生存加工优势效应的自然选择理论解释是否可行。实验1选取8岁、10岁、12岁、21岁和64岁年龄组个体为被试, 考查了生存加工优势在各年龄组的表现。实验2通过比较繁衍情境(择偶、怀孕和抚育)与生存、自我联想情境的回忆成绩, 考查了繁衍加工的记忆优势。结果发现:(1)不同年龄组个体均表现出生存加工优势效应, 但生存优势效应量是否存在年龄差异还需进一步验证; (2)择偶和抚育情境表现出繁衍加工优势。这一结果支持了生存加工优势效应的自然选择理论。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
唐卫海
谢斯
刘玉霞
白学军
刘希平
关键词 生存加工优势效应自然选择理论年龄繁衍加工    
Abstract

Words processed under a survival scenario have a remarkable advantage over those processed in other deep processing conditions (e.g. pleasantness rating, self-reference, moving scenario, and intentional learning). This robust phenomenon is known as survival-processing advantage effect. Nairne, Thompson and Pandeirada (2007) suggested that our memory systems were naturally adjusted to process and store fitness-relevant information which was beneficial to surviving and reproducing. However, this evolutionary-based explanation has little empirical support. The current study aimed to confirm this assumption directly. According to the assumption that the survival-processing advantage effect is due to the pressure brought by natural selection, we inferred that it should be equally found among individuals of different ages. Meanwhile, considering the fitness-relevance assumption, processing words in other fitness-relevant contexts using the same paradigm as survival processing should also yield better memory. Two experiments were conducted in the current study. In the first experiment, 300 participants were randomly chosen from five age groups (8, 10, 12, 21, and 64 years old). The participants were then assigned to the primitive hunting scenario or the hunting contest scenario. Primitive hunting scenario described a dangerous surrounding which participants imagined to hunt for the survival of their tribe. By contrast, the hunting contest scenario did not involve life safety. In this scenario, participants were instructed to imagine taking a hunting contest. All the participants were also asked to assess to what extent each word was relevant to the activities in the imaginative scenario. The instructions for the free recall appeared unexpectedly after a two-minute distraction task. In the second experiment, 150 undergraduates were randomly recruited and assigned to one of the five rating tasks: survival, mate selection, pregnancy, raising a child, and self-reference. The survival scenario needed participants imagine to survive without basic materials in foreign grasslands. The mate selection, pregnancy, raising a child scenarios were all related to reproduction. By contrast, the self-reference was unrelated to survival or reproduction and a namely fitness-irrelevant task. The procedures of word assessment and free recall were similar to Experiment 1. In both experiments, the accuracy of free recall, the ratings, and the rating latencies were recorded for analysis. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that the proportion of correct recall was higher in the primitive hunting condition than in the hunting contest condition across age groups. That is, we observed a typical survival-processing advantage effect in all groups. More importantly, there was no significant difference in the amount of survival benefit. Additionally, there were no statistical differences in the rating latencies and the ratings between primitive hunting condition and hunting contest condition within age group. The results of Experiment 2 showed that recall performances in the “mate selection” scenario and the “raising a child” scenario were better than that in fitness-irrelevant task, suggesting a reproduction advantage. The pregnancy condition did not show a memory advantage possibly because pregnancy was less important in terms of evolutionary significance, especially for the younger participants who were lack of experiences about pregnancy. Also, the error rate of free recall, the rating latencies and the ratings were similar to the results of the first experiment. There were no differences between conditions. In accordance with the natural selection explanation, the survival advantages occurred in different ages and the magnitude of the effects did not differ among ages. These results suggested that people prioritized the processing of fitness-relevant information independent of development. However, this conclusion needed to be further verified due to a low power of the ANOVA test. The higher accuracy of free recall found in the scenario of mate selection and raising a child suggested that reproduction-processing and survival-processing had memory advantages compared to fitness-irrelevant processing. Our findings provided good evidence for the natural selection explanation.

Key wordssurvival-processing advantage effect    natural selection theory    age    reproduction-processing
收稿日期: 2014-03-19      出版日期: 2015-04-25
基金资助:

教育部人文社科研究基金(14YJA190007); 天津市哲学社科规划重点课题(TJJX13-002); 天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题(CE2016); 天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划。

通讯作者: 刘希平, E-mail: lxp3771@sina.com   
引用本文:   
唐卫海;谢斯;刘玉霞;白学军;刘希平. 记忆的生存加工优势是自然选择的结果:来自跨年龄比较和繁衍情境的证据[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00503.
TANG Weihai; XIE Si; LIU Yuxia; BAI Xuejun; LIU Xiping. Survival-processing Memory Advantage Comes from Natural Selection: Evidence from Cross-age Comparison and Reproduction Scenarios. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 503-513.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00503      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I4/503
[1] 丁晓, 吕娜, 杨雅琳, 司继伟.  工作记忆成分的年龄相关差异 对算术策略运用的预测效应[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 759-770.
[2] 罗利;黄敏儿. 情绪调节在特质与情绪间中介效应模型的年龄差异[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1455-1466.
[3] 肖红蕊;黄一帆;龚先旻;王大华. 简化的联合再认范式中情绪对错误记忆影响的年龄差异[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 19-28.
[4] 陈永香;朱莉琪. 身体部位与早期习得的汉语动词的联结及其对动词习得年龄的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 912-921.
[5] 张积家;陈穗清;张广岩;戴东红. 聋大学生的词汇习得年龄效应[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(11): 1421-1433.
[6] 陈俊,林少惠,张积家. 潮汕话-普通话双言者的词汇习得年龄效应[J]. , 2011, 43(02): 111-122.
[7] 陈思佚,周仁来. 前瞻记忆的年老化效应:前瞻成分和回溯成分的调节作用[J]. , 2010, 42(06): 640-650.
[8] Maria Larsson, Margareta Hedner, and Jonas Olofsson. 年龄和性别对气味和词汇的语义识别的不同影响[J]. , 2009, 41(11): 1049-1053.
[9] 黄飞,李育辉,张建新. 年级还是年龄?两种不同的效应来源
——以青少年人格横断比较为例
[J]. , 2008, 40(12): 1287-1296.
[10] 陈宝国,尤文平,周会霞. 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应:语义假设的证据[J]. , 2007, 39(01): 9-17.
[11] 陈天勇,李德明. 抑制和加工速度与液态智力的年老化[J]. , 2006, 38(05): 734-742.
[12] 张萌,张积家. 语调在6~10岁儿童对不同类型反语认知中的作用[J]. , 2006, 38(02): 197-206.
[13] 张积家,张萌. 他人期望类型对6~10岁儿童不同类型反语认知的影响[J]. , 2005, 37(06): 767-775.
[14] 陈天勇,李德明. 执行功能可分离性及与年龄关系的潜变量分析[J]. , 2005, 37(02): 210-217.
[15] 王青,焦书兰,杨玉芳. 基于事件的前瞻性记忆的年老化[J]. , 2003, 35(04): 476-482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn