Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
熟悉性和兼容性对复合社会范畴刻板印象表征的影响
陈莉1;王沛2;谢轶雯2;张琴2
(1西北师范大学心理学院, 兰州 730070)  (2上海师范大学心理学系, 上海 200234)
The Effect of Familiarity and Compatibility on Mental Representation of the Stereotype in Compound Social Categories
CHEN Li1; WANG Pei2; XIE Yiwen2; ZHANG Qin2
(1 School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China) (2 School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
全文: PDF(540 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

通过对启动任务范式的改进, 运用3个实验全面考察了复合社会范畴本身的熟悉性和兼容性对复合社会范畴刻板印象中抽象表征和样例表征策略运用的影响。实验1分别以熟悉的、不熟悉且在刻板印象上不兼容的复合范畴为研究对象, 研究发现对熟悉的复合范畴采用抽象表征, 而对不熟悉且在刻板印象上不兼容的复合范畴的表征采用样例表征; 实验2以熟悉且在刻板印象上不兼容的复合范畴为研究对象, 研究发现对于熟悉但构成范畴不兼容的复合范畴的表征也采用样例表征; 实验3采用相同的实验范式, 在描述和定义两种启动任务中设置子范畴间兼容的刻板特质词和不兼容的刻板特质词, 选择与实验2相同的复合范畴“男中学教师”为目标群体, 更加严密地证实和整合了实验1与实验2的研究结论。3个实验的结果说明复合范畴刻板印象的表征关键取决于兼容性, 一旦复合社会范畴的构成范畴在刻板印象上不兼容, 那么对于这一复合社会范畴刻板印象的表征采用样例表征。当构成复合范畴的两个子范畴之间兼容时, 熟悉性成为刻板印象运用抽象表征还是样例表征的影响因素, 无论是对内群体的刻板印象还是外群体的刻板印象, 对熟悉的刻板特质词的表征运用抽象表征。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈莉
王沛
谢轶雯
张琴
关键词 复合社会范畴的刻板印象抽象表征样例表征熟悉性兼容性    
Abstract

In previous research, little social cognitional work has focused on the mental representation of the stereotype about compound social categories, which are defined as the intersection of two or more constituent categories and can be construed as subcategories. There are two models of social subcategory representation which can explain how to form the stereotype presentation of compound categories. Brewer’s abstraction model and Smith’ exemplar model can both be right, but maybe in different circumstances, because the stereotype presentation of compound categories may be influenced by familiarity, compatibility and some other factors such as perceiver’ own category attributes. Thus, in present study, we explored the interaction among compound categories’ familiarity, compatibility and participant’ category attributes (in-group or out-group). We hypothesized that people would make exemplar-based trait judgments of social compound categories, consistent with Smith’s model, when those compounds were relatively unfamiliar. The stereotype representation of compatible and familiar compound category might depend on abstract knowledge. Maybe there were differences in the stereotype representation between in-group and out-group memberships. We conducted three experiments in present study and improved priming paradigm to explore the issues above. In Experiment 1, we chose female kindergarten teachers as familiar compound category and male kindergarten teachers as unfamiliar compound category to test the effect of compound familiarity on the stereotype representation of the compound social categories. And in Experiment 2, we chose female secondary school teachers as the target group. In addition, “rational” and “exquisite” were respectively chosen as compatible stereotypical trait word and incompatible stereotypical trait word to explore the effect of compatibility on the representation of compound category’ stereotype when the target was familiar. Based on experiment 2, male secondary school teachers and female secondary school teachers were recruited to explore whether there are differences in the response to compatible stereotypical trait word and incompatible stereotypical trait word between in-group and out-group memberships in Experiment 3. The results of Experiment 1 revealed that when the target was male kindergarten teachers, participants’ response in description group was faster than that in definition group during recall tasks. However, there were no such differences in reaction time when the target was female kindergarten teachers. In other words, participants had exemplars of male elementary school teachers but had abstract presentation of female kindergarten teachers. The results of experiment 2 showed that participants activated the exemplars of male secondary school teachers when they rated incompatible stereotypical trait word “exquisite” in description group but when the stereotypical trait word was “rational”, there was no exemplar activation. So the stereotype representation of male secondary school teachers relied on the stereotype compatibility of the subcategories (male & secondary school teacher). The results of experiment 3 demonstrated that the effect of familiarity and compatibility on the stereotype presentation of compound categories is not moderated by in-group and out-group memberships. In conclusion, the stereotype representation of compatible and familiar compound categories depend on abstract knowledge, whereas when compound social categories are unfamiliar, perceivers can activate individual category members (i.e., exemplars). In addition, the stereotype representation of incompatible and familiar compound categories also depends on exemplars.

Key wordsthe stereotype of compound social categories    abstract representation    representation on exemplars    familiarity    compatibility.
收稿日期: 2012-11-19      出版日期: 2015-03-25
基金资助:

教育部新世纪优秀人才计划项目“多重社会范畴的加工机制”;甘肃省自然科学基金项目“刻板印象的心理表征特点及神经机制”(145RJZA040)资助。

通讯作者: 王沛, E-mail: wangpei1970@163.com   
引用本文:   
陈莉;王沛;谢轶雯;张琴. 熟悉性和兼容性对复合社会范畴刻板印象表征的影响[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00375.
WANG Pei;CHEN Li; XIE Yiwen; ZHANG Qin. The Effect of Familiarity and Compatibility on Mental Representation of the Stereotype in Compound Social Categories. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 375-388.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00375      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I3/375
[1] 贾永萍;周楚;李林;郭秀艳. 汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 111-120.
[2] 毛新瑞;徐慧芳;郭春彦. 双加工再认提取中的情绪记忆增强效应[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1111-1123.
[3] 叶晓红;陈幼贞;孟迎芳. 回想、熟悉性与启动在编码过程的认知神经机制[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(9): 1101-1110.
[4] 陈永香;朱莉琪. 影响动作图片命名的因素[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 11-18.
[5] 石文典;李秀君;王维;严文华. 多通道与单通道的内隐学习效应比较[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(12): 1313-1323.
[6] 张积家,董昌锋. 范畴变量对虚假记忆的影响[J]. , 2006, 38(03): 324-332.
[7] 李寿欣,丁兆叶,张利增. 认知方式与线索特征对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. , 2005, 37(03): 320-327.
[8] 韩凯,沈大为,李波. FOK产生机制的再验证[J]. , 2001, 33(01): 13-16.
[9] 罗劲,林仲贤. FOK的线索熟悉性假说与线索熟悉性判断[J]. , 1999, 31(02): 121-127.
[10] 罗劲,林仲贤. 对FOK的线索熟悉性假说的重新检验[J]. , 1998, 30(03): 241-247.
[11] 韩松梅,朱滢. 再认的两种机制及其与启动效应的关系[J]. , 1995, 27(01): 9-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn