Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
积极情绪对心理旋转的影响:趋近动机的调节效应
崔丽霞;张玉静;肖晶;张钦
(首都师范大学心理系, 北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室, 北京 100048)
The Influence of Positive Affect on Mental Rotation of Compound Stimuli: the Moderating Role of Approch Motivation
CUI Lixia;ZHANG Yujing;XIAO Jing;ZHANG Qin
(Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)
全文: PDF(569 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

基于Gable和Harmone-Jones提出的动机维度模型, 采用行为的和认知的情绪诱发手段, 研究趋近动机强度不同的积极情绪对复合字母刺激心理旋转整体优先效应的影响。实验一采用微笑的面部表情配合三种身体姿势(前倾、挺直和后倚)分别诱发高中低三种趋近动机强度不同的积极情绪; 实验二采用金钱激励延迟范式作为情绪诱发手段, 增加中性情绪对比条件。结果表明:(1)在后倚和挺直时大字母的反应时均显著短于小字母(p < 0.05), 而前倾时大小字母无显著差异(p > 0.05); (2)奖励(获得/不获得)的主效应不显著 (p > 0.05), 但是在目标后获得反馈和目标后意外获得反馈两种条件下大字母的反应时显著快于小字母(p < 0.05), 而目标前获得线索条件下大小字母间反应时差异不显著(p > 0.05)。结论:趋近动机强度调节着积极情绪对心理旋转整体优先效应的影响; 但是没发现效价(积极情绪/中性情绪)调节心理旋转整体优先效应。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
崔丽霞
张玉静
肖晶
张钦
关键词 趋近动机积极情绪心理旋转动机维度模型金钱激励延迟范式    
Abstract

The Motivational Dimensional Model (MDM, Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2010c), based on a series of experiments on attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation, proposes that the positive affect high in approach motivation narrows the scope of cognition, whereas the positive affect low in approach motivation broadens the scope of cognition (Gable & Harmon-Jones, 2010b, 2011a; Price & Harmon-Jones, 2010). The current study examined the influence of positive affects differed in approach motivational intensity on the effect of global precedence on mental rotation of compound stimuli on the basis of MDM hypothesis. We carried out two experiments using behavioral and cognitive emotion-eliciting methods to examine the influence of positive affects differed in the approach motivational intensities on the effect of global precedence on mental rotation of compound stimuli. In Experiment 1 we adopted 3 body postures (leaning forward, sitting upright and reclining backward) accompanied by the facial expression of smile to elicit positive affects with high, moderate and low approach motivation, respectively. In Experiment 2 we adopted Monetary Incentive Delay Paradigm, which added neutral condition lacked in experiment 1. Twenty eight and thirty one university students completed the parity judgment task that requires mental rotation of compound stimuli in each experiment. The first object was to examine the influence of positive affects differed in approach motivation on mental rotation. The second object was to examine the different effect between the positive affect in different approach motivation and the neutral condition on mental rotation. The results were: (1) In Experiment 1 Individuals responded faster to global targets than local targets when sitting upright and reclining forward, while their performance remained in the same level given local and global targets when leaning forward; (2) In Experiment 2 the results showed that the main effect of the reward (gain/no gain) on the RTs of mental rotation task was not significant, but individuals responded faster to global targets than local targets in the postgoal expected and postgoal unexpected condition while did not differ in their RTs to local and global targets after the pretgoal cue. We concluded that the approch motivation moderated the influence of positive affect on the effect of global precedence on mental rotation. The effect of global precedence on mental rotation showed up when the approach motivation was low but disappeared when the approach motivation was high. These results suggest the positive affect low in approach motivation broadens the scope of mental rotation, whereas the positive affect high in approach motivation narrows the scope of mental rotation. But we did not found that the valence (positive affect / neutral condition) moderated the effect of global precedence on mental rotation.

Key wordsapproch motivation    positive affect    mental rotation    the Motivational Dimensional Model    Monetary Incentive Delay
收稿日期: 2013-01-08      出版日期: 2013-11-25
基金资助:

北京市教委科技面上项目(KM201210028014)、北京市属高等学校人才强教深化计划“学术创新团队建设计划” (PHR201007109)、国家自然科学基金 (31070902)和国家自然科学基金(31200790)的资助。

通讯作者: 张钦   
引用本文:   
崔丽霞;张玉静;肖晶;张钦. 积极情绪对心理旋转的影响:趋近动机的调节效应[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01228.
CUI Lixia;ZHANG Yujing;XIAO Jing;ZHANG Qin. The Influence of Positive Affect on Mental Rotation of Compound Stimuli: the Moderating Role of Approch Motivation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1228-1241.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01228      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2013/V45/I11/1228
[1] 龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 郭雅薇.  情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.
[2] 冯彪;徐亮;张蔚欣;陈婷;王文清;郑希付. 积极情绪对条件性恐惧泛化的抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 317-328.
[3] 刘芳; 丁锦红; 张钦. 高、低趋近积极情绪对不同注意加工阶段的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 794-803.
[4] 段锦云;周冉;古晓花. 正面自我标签对建议采纳的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(10): 1591-1602.
[5] 王振宏;刘亚;蒋长好. 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 546-555.
[6] 何晓丽,王振宏,王克静. 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1408-1417.
[7] 陶维东,黄希庭,张慧,凤四海,刘强,陶晓丽,谢超香,李红,孙弘进. 被试自身人手初始状态对心理旋转加工的影响:眼动研[J]. , 2009, 41(01): 10-25.
[8] 邱香,傅小兰, 隋丹妮,李健,唐一源. 复合字母刺激心理旋转加工中的整体优先效应[J]. , 2009, 41(01): 1-9.
[9] 王艳梅,郭德俊. 积极情绪对任务转换的影响[J]. , 2008, 40(03): 301-306.
[10] 陶维东,孙弘进,闫京江,周柳. 自我和物体为参照系的心理旋转分离:内旋效应[J]. , 2008, 40(01): 14-24.
[11] 吴彦文,游旭群.

双任务情境下心理旋转的并行加工机制

[J]. , 2007, 39(05): 785-794.
[12] 游旭群,王鹏,晏碧华. 不同平面心理旋转的角色效应[J]. , 2007, 39(01): 58-63.
[13] 吴冰,孙复川. 旋转汉字识别的眼动特性[J]. , 1999, 31(01): 7-14.
[14] 喻柏林,李朝晖,张蜀林. 复杂性对倾斜汉字识别的影响[J]. , 1995, 27(04): 337-343.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn