Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (10) : 1787-1793     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01787
|
The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency
ZHANG Miao1,2,WU Di1,2,LI Ming3,LING Yibai1,2,ZHANG Ming4,5,ZHAO Ke1,4()
1 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3 Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
4 Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
5 Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, Beijing 116044, China
Download: PDF(514 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

“Sense of agency” refers to the sense of controlling one’s actions and the course of events in the outside world. It is based on the match between the expected action and the real sensory feedback. The first part of this article introduces a method for implicit measurement of sense of agency. The second part deals with the factors that influence the sense of agency from the aspects of intentionality and sensory feedback. Part three provides the conclusion. With an emphasis on the functions of the prefrontal and parietal lobes, this article provides evidence to explain the mechanism of sense of agency through the theoretical model and cognitive neuroscience.

Keywords sense of agency      binding effect      feedback      intentionality     
Corresponding Authors: Ke ZHAO     E-mail: zhaok@psych.ac.cn
Issue Date: 27 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Miao
WU Di
LI Ming
LING Yibai
ZHANG Ming
ZHAO Ke
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Miao,WU Di,LI Ming, et al. The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1787-1793.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01787     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I10/1787
  
  
1 Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D., & Frith C . ( 2000). Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport, 11( 11), R11-R16.
2 Blanke O., Ortigue S., Landis T., & Seeck M . ( 2002). Neuropsychology: Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419( 6904), 269-270.
3 Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20( 10), 1221-1228.
pmid: 19732384 url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40575171
4 Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2010). Causal contraction: Spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 21( 1), 44-48.
5 Buehner, M. J . ( 2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23( 12), 1490-1497.
6 Caspar E. A., Christensen J. F., Cleeremans A., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26( 5), 585-592.
pmid: 4791480 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898470
7 Cavazzana A., Begliomini C., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2017). Intentional binding as a marker of agency across the lifespan. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 104-114.
pmid: 28501697 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28501697
8 Chambon V., Wenke D., Fleming S. M., Prinz W., & Haggard P . ( 2013). An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cerebral Cortex, 23( 5), 1031-1037.
pmid: 22510529 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22510529
9 Chambon V., Moore J. W., & Haggard P . ( 2015). TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Structure and Function, 220( 6), 3627-3639.
pmid: 25134684 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25134684
10 Crivelli D., & Balcon, M. ( 2017). The agent brain: A review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies on sensing agency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11.
url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5701922/
11 Ebert J. P., & Wegner, D. M . ( 2010). Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19( 1), 481-489.
pmid: 19896868 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-04616-041
12 Engbert K., & Wohlschläger, A. ( 2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 2), 255-264.
pmid: 17113309 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810006001012
13 Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., & Haggard P . ( 2007). Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1261-1268.
pmid: 18085941 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/33/6/1261/
14 Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., & Haggard P . ( 2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107( 2), 693-704.
pmid: 17825813 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027707002144
15 Elsner B., & Hommel, B. ( 2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 138-154.
pmid: 14685854 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8
16 Farrer C., & Frith, C. D . ( 2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15( 3), 596-603.
17 Fink G. R., Marshall J. C., Halligan P. W., Frith C. D., Driver J., Frackowiak R. S. J., & Dolan R. J . ( 1999). The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain, 122( 3), 497-512.
pmid: 10094258 url: http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/122/3/497
18 Frith, C. D . ( 2014). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137-142.
19 Gomes G., ( 2002). The interpretation of Libet's results on the timing of conscious events: A commentary. Consciousness and Cognition, 11( 2), 221-230.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810002905568
20 Haggard P., ( 2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18( 4), 196-207.
pmid: 28251993 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28251993
21 Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J . ( 2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5( 4), 382-385.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/nn827
22 Hascalovitz A. C., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2015). Personality and intentional binding: An exploratory study using the narcissistic personality inventory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00013
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00013
23 Helmholtz, H. V . ( 1866). Concerning the perceptions in general. Treatise on physiological optics.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283601273_Concerning_the_perceptions_in_general
24 Humphreys G. R., & Buehner, M. J . ( 2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1542-1549.
pmid: 19803655 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19803655
25 James W., ( 1890). The Principles of. Psychology, 2.
26 Jo H. G., Wittmann M., Hinterberger T., & Schmidt S . ( 2014). The readiness potential reflects intentional binding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 421-421.
pmid: 24959135 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4051209/
27 Kawato M., ( 1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9( 6), 718-727.
pmid: 10607637 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10607637
28 Khalighinejad N., & Haggard, P. ( 2015). Modulating human sense of agency with non-invasive brain stimulation. Cortex, 69, 93-103.
pmid: 26004997 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26004997
29 Khalighinejad N., Di C S., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Endogenous action selection processes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contribute to sense of agency: A meta- analysis of tDCS studies of ‘intentional binding’. Brain Stimulation, 9( 3), 372-379.
30 Libet B., Gleason C. A., Wright E. W., & Pearl D. K . ( 1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential) the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106( 3), 623-642.
31 Lindner A., Haarmeier T., Erb M., Grodd W., & Thier P . ( 2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 11), 1899-1912.
32 MacDonald P. A., & Paus, T. ( 2003). The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 13( 9), 962-967.
33 Moore J. W., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21( 1), 546-561.
pmid: 22240158 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22240158
34 Moore J. W., Ruge D., Wenke D., Rothwell J., & Haggard P . ( 2010). Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2503-2509.
35 Shibasaki H., & Hallett, M. ( 2006). What is the Bereitschaftspotential?. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117( 11), 2341-2356.
pmid: 16876476 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/16876476
36 Sirigu A., Daprati E., Pradat-Diehl P., Franck N., & Jeannerod M . ( 1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122( 10), 1867-1874.
pmid: 10506089 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1999-01344-002
37 Sperduti M., Delaveau P., Fossati P., & Nadel J . ( 2011). Different brain structures related to self-and external- agency attribution: A brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216( 2), 151-157.
38 Stetson C., Cui X., Montague P. R., & Eagleman D. M . ( 2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51( 5), 651-659.
39 Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . ( 2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 1), 219-239.
pmid: 17482480 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482480
40 Tapal A., Oren E., Dar R., & Eitam B . ( 2017). The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1552.
41 Voss M., Chambon V., Wenke D., Kühn S., & Haggard P . ( 2017). In and out of control: brain mechanisms linking fluency of action selection to self-agency in patients with schizophrenia. Brain, 140( 8), 2226-2239.
42 Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z., & Jordan M. I . ( 1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269( 5232), 1880-1882.
43 Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23( 20), 2028-2032.
pmid: 24094850 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24094850
44 Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7( 1), 8733.
pmid: 5562802 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5562802/
45 Zhao K., Chen Y. H., Yan W. J., & Fu X. L . ( 2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PloS One, 8( 5), e64819.
46 Zhao K., Gu R. L., Wang L., Xiao P., Chen Y. H., Liang J ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2014). Voluntary pressing and releasing actions induce different senses of time: Evidence from event-related brain responses. Scientific Reports, 4, 6047.
47 Zhao K., Hu L., Qu F. B., Cui Q., Piao Q. H., Xu H ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2016). Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect. Experimental Brain Research, 234( 8), 2283-2292.
pmid: 27038203 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00221-016-4633-5
48 Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., & Frensch P. A . ( 2004). The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 163-175.
pmid: 14634810 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14634810
[1] Danyang LI,Peng LI,Hong LI. The updated theories of feedback-related negativity in the last decade[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1642-1650.
[2] Jing ZHANG,Wei CHEN. The investigation of minimal self based on self-illusion: The embodied constructivism position[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1244-1252.
[3] Yun ZHANG,Qingxiong WENG. The analysis of characteristics and internal mechanisms of multisource feedback[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1131-1140.
[4] Ying ZHANG, Fu YANG. Feedback-seeking behavior: Influencing factors and localization development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1121-1130.
[5] TIAN Haoyue, LI Lihong, XU Zhe, LI Fei, JIN Dan, AN Canling.  Sense of agency in the minimal self[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 872-885.
[6] SHE Zhuang, JIANG Guangrong, SUN Qi-wu, SHI Yanwei.  Formal feedback in psychotherapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1197-1207.
[7] Xiaoxu Fan; Lan Wang; Hanyu Shao; Daniel Kersten; Sheng He. Temporally flexible feedback processing in foveal cortex for peripheral object recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 67-.
[8] Weiying Chen; Shenbing Kuang;Tao Zhang. Different aging effects on intra- and inter-areal inhibition in visual motion perception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 62-.
[9] XU Xiaohui; LI Jing; ZHU Liqi. Infants and Toddlers’ Understanding of Sharing Characteristics in Cooperative Activities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1404-1412.
[10] ZHANG Hui;XU Fuming;LI Bin;LUO Hanbing;LIU Chenghao. Choice Blindness: Did You Really Know What You Have Chosen?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1312-1318.
[11] SUN Hailong;XING Qiang. The Influences of Feedback on Perceptual Category Learning and Its’ Cognitive and Neurophysiological Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 67-74.
[12] CHEN Jian;YUAN Jie;WANG Hailing;WANG Yan;FU Shimin. C1 Modulation Effect and Its Factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 407-417.
[13] XIANG Chang-Chun;LONG Li-Rong. Motives of Information-seeking and the Determinant Factors in Organizations[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 283-291.
[14] FU Qiang;DUAN Jin-Yun;TIAN Xiao-Ming. The Emotion Mechanism of Employee Voice Behavior:A New Exploratory Perspective[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 274-282.
[15] YUAN Yuan;LIU Chang;SHEN Wang-Bing. Feedback-related Negativity and Social Relation Cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1593-1603.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech