Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (1) : 133-144     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00133
Regular Articles |
The concept, antecedents and consequences of loyalty to supervisor
LI Haidong1; DUAN Jinyun2; ZENG Kai3
(1 College of Economy and Management, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen 333403, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China) (3 School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
Download: PDF(448 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Loyalty to supervisor refers to the relative strength of subordinates’ identification and internalization with supervisor and their values. An employee with high loyalty to his/her leader would show more attachment behavior like sacrifice and dedication towards leader. The mainstream measurement model of loyalty to supervisor has three types: (1) three-dimensional structure model consists affective commitment, normative commitment and continuance commitment in the west. (2) five-dimensional scale proposed by Chen et al. which consists identification with supervisor, internalization of supervisor’s values, dedication to supervisor, attachment to supervisor, and extra effort for supervisor; (3) five-dimensional model includes identification with supervisor and internalization of the supervisor’s values, initiative accommodation, task assistance, obedience, and sacrifice for supervisor raised by Jiang et al.. The existing empirical research have identified that individual characteristics, leaders’ factors, cultural and organizational context all have influence on loyalty to supervisor. Besides, the consequences of loyalty to supervisor such as job performance, organizational citizenship behavior, turnover intention, job satisfaction, supervisor- subordinate conflicts have become a hot focus to scholars. The future orientation of such research may consist of the effect of personality factors on loyalty to supervisor, the negative effects of loyalty to supervisor, the dynamic evolution of loyalty to supervisor, and the "person-centered" approach of supervisory loyalty.

Keywords loyalty to supervisor      organizational commitment      comparison of eastern and western      antecedents      consequences     
Corresponding Authors: DUAN Jinyun, E-mail: mgjyduan@hotmail.com   
Issue Date: 15 January 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Haidong
DUAN Jinyun
ZENG Kai
Cite this article:   
LI Haidong,DUAN Jinyun,ZENG Kai. The concept, antecedents and consequences of loyalty to supervisor[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 133-144.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00133     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2017/V25/I1/133
[1] LIU Yanli; LU Guizhi; LIU Yong. Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 228-241.
[2] SUN Jianmin; ZHANG Yejun. Presenteeism in the Workplace: A New Topic in Organization and Management Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 654-668.
[3] HU Shaonan; WANG Yong. Concept, Measurements, Antecedents and Consequences of Work Engagement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1975-1984.
[4] ZHANG Tian;DING Xuechen;WENG Jing;FU Hong;XUE Yan. Does Forgiveness Increase or Reduce the Possibility of Further Offenses: The Discussion about the Consequences of Forgiveness Based on the Perspective of Offender[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 104-111.
[5] HUANGFU Gang1; JIANG DingYu2; ZHANG Gangying3. From Organizational Commitment to Organizational Loyalty: The Concept and Structures of Chinese Organizational Loyalty[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 711-720.
[6] WEI Qiu-Jiang;DUAN Jin-Yun;FAN Ting-Wei. A New Perspective of Researching the Relationship Between Employee and Organization: Idiosyncratic Deals[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1601-1605.
[7] YUAN Qing-Hong,;CHEN Wen-Chun. Concept, Measurement and Related Constructs of Job Embeddedness[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 941-946.
[8] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. Research on Perceived Supervisor Support: Review and Prospect[J]. , 2008, 16(02): 340-347.
[9] Wei Jun;Cheng ZhongYuan;Zhang Mian. Principal Theories, Measurement and Relevant Variables of Organizational Identification[J]. , 2007, 15(06): 948-955.
[10] Ling Li;LuChangqin. A Review of the Research on Psychological Empowerment[J]. , 2007, 15(04): 652-658.
[11] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. A Review of the Research on Work/Job Engagement[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 366-372.
[12] Li Rui;Ling Wenquan. A Review of the Research on Collective Efficacy in I/O Psychology[J]. , 2006, 14(06): 924-931.
[13] Zhou Mingjian,Bao Gongmin. A Review of Supervisory Commitment Theory[J]. , 2005, 13(03): 356-365.
[14] Hu Weipeng,Shi Kan. A Review of the Research about Organizational Commitment[J]. , 2004, 12(01): 103-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech