Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (9) : 1550-1559     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01550
Regular Articles |
Skill or Style: Two Approaches to Measure Individual Differences on Rational Thinking
FENG Xue; PENG Kaiping
(Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(384 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Based on the literature review on rational thinking, the current article examined two different approaches to measure rational thinking, and discussed the relationships between these two. One approach to measure rational thinking is to define the rational thinking as a thinking skill on which people adapt different strategies to respond to difference situation tasks. The other approach is to define it as a thinking style, measured usually by self-report scales to evaluate individual chronic and stable tendency. We proposed a theoretical model to synthesize the differences between these two approaches, suggesting the rational thinking style mediates the relationship between cognitive ability and rational thinking skill. That is to say, cognitive ability could predicts the performance of heuristic and thinking bias tasks only for individuals with high rational thinking style.

Keywords rational thinking skill      rational thinking style      heuristic and thinking bias      individual difference     
Corresponding Authors: PENG Kaiping, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 September 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
PENG Kaiping
Cite this article:   
FENG Xue,PENG Kaiping. Skill or Style: Two Approaches to Measure Individual Differences on Rational Thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559.
URL:     OR
[1] Shan Xu; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Yiying Song; Jia Liua. Game-based assessment on visuospatial ability in a large population of human participants: an Internet-based big-data approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 14-.
[2] WANG Yan; YANG Juan. The Modulation Effect of Personality Traits on the #br# Psychosocial Stress Response[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460.
[3] ZHANG Xiuping; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Neural Mechanism and Influential Factors of Semantic Unification in Discourse Comprehension[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141.
[4] ZUO Tingting; HU Qingfen. Spatial Cognitive Style and Its Relationship with Spatial Abilities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 959-966.
[5] QIU Fanghui; LUO Yuejia; JIA Shiwei. Categorical Perception of Facial Expression and Its Individual Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 946-958.
[6] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[7] JIANG Jun;WANG Zimeng;WAN Xuan;JIANG Cunmei. Temporal Processing in Music: Effects of Musical Elements and Individual Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 650-658.
[8] CHEN Jiangtao; TANG Dandan; LIU Congcong; CHEN Antao. Individual Differences in Attentional Blink[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1564-1572.
[9] ZHOU Lei;LI Shu;XU Yan;LIANG Zhuyuan. Theoretical Construction of Decision-Making Styles: An Information-Processing Approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 112-121.
[10] ZHANG Jing;LIU Ke;ZHAO Xin. Can Automatic Emotion Regulation Be Manipulated? A Review of the Measurements[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1554-1559.
[11] LI Xiang;ZHENG Yong;MENG Xianxin;LI Peng;LI Hong. Adult’s Reaction to Infant Cry and Its Brain Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1770-1779.
[12] XU Xi-Zheng;ZHANG Jing-Huan;LIU Gui-Rong;LI Ying. The Influence of Rewards on Creativity and Its Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1419-1425.
[13] ZHOU Zheng;XIN Zi-Qiang. Relationships Between Mathematical Ability and Decision Making: A Perspective of Individual Difference[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 542-551.
[14] WANG Song;LI Jing-Guang;LIU Jia. The Genetic Basis of Individual Differences in Reading Ability: A Mata-analysis of Twins Studies[J]. , 2011, 19(9): 1267-1280.
[15] HE Jin-Lian;GUO Shao-Dan;ZHANG Li-Yan. Generativity:Individual Differences and Influencing Factors[J]. , 2009, 17(05): 996-1001.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech