Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (6) : 1079-1094     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01079
Regular Articles |
The Trickle-Down Effect in Leadership Research: A Review and Prospect
WANG Zhen; XU Haoying; DU Chenduo
(Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
Download: PDF(597 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The inquiry of the trickle-down effect is booming and developing into a new realm in the leadership study. Trickle-down effect refers to a top-down process in which leaders’ trait, cognition, affect, attitude and behavior induce the similar responses of followers and/or groups. Based on 62 independent empirical investigations reported in 50 articles, we found: (1) Trickle-down effect can be classified into six types according to the nature (state-like, affects, cognitions, attitudes, behaviors, relationships) of the transmitted variables; (2)Trickle-down effect can further influence the attitudes, behaviors and performance of followers, teams and other stakeholders; (3)There are mainly five theories explaining the occurrence of trickle-down effect, namely emotion contagion/affective event theory, social learning theory, social exchange theory, social identity theory and social information processing theory; (4) The strength of trickle-down effect depends on some specific leader, follower/team, and contextual attributes.

Keywords leadership effectiveness      trickle-down effect      underling mechanism      boundary conditions     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Zhen, E-mail: wangzhenruc@163.com   
Issue Date: 25 June 2015
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Zhen
XU Haoying
DU Chenduo
Cite this article:   
WANG Zhen,XU Haoying,DU Chenduo. The Trickle-Down Effect in Leadership Research: A Review and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1079-1094.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01079     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2015/V23/I6/1079
[1] TAN Le; SONG Heyi; YANG Xiao. The influence mechanism of environmental uncertainty on leadership effectiveness based on cognitive perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1339-1352.
[2] SUN Jianmin; WANG Honglei. The potential mechanisms involved in the negative effect of high performance work system[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1091-1106.
[3] ZHAO Qi; LI Feng. Team leadership and team effectiveness: A multilevel study through the lens of social identity theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1677-1689.
[4] CHEN Pei; YANG Fu; SHI Wei. Servant leadership: Concept, measurements, influencing factors,  and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 143-157.
[5] WANG Zhen;SONG Meng;SUN Jianmin. Authentic Leadership: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Network[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 458-473.
[6] WANG Biying; GAO Riguang. The Effectiveness of Servant Leadership Behaviors in Chinese Organizational Context: A Longitudinal Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1532-1542.
[7] WANG Zhen;SUN Jian-Min;ZHAO Yi-Jun. Leadership Effectiveness in the Chinese Context: A Meta-Analysis of Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange and Abusive Supervision[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 174-190.
[8] YU Bo;LIU Xin-Mei. “Opening the Black Box”: The Development and Prospect on the Mediating Variable for the Transformational Leadership[J]. , 2009, 17(01): 158-164.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech