Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (3) : 492-501     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00492
Regular Articles |
The Impact of Life Events on Emotional Reactions and Behavior Options: Theory Comparison and Research Implications
CHEN Hongmin;ZHAO Lei;WU Xinchun
(1 Mental Quality Education Center, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China) (2 School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) (3 Higher Education Research Institute, China Youth University for Political Sciences, Beijing 100089, China)
Download: PDF(194 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Regarding the impact of life events on individual’s emotional reactions and behavior options, all the studies have tried to explain the mechanism of life events impacting on individuals from the perspective of relation between different life events and behavior decision-making, while different theories have different interpretations. Behavior/Economic Model regard people as “absolutely rational”, while Averaging/Summation Model, Peak-End Rule and Mental Accounting Model regard people as “bounded rational”. By detailed comparison of the latter three theories, we find that they are different from the exploring perspectives, the definition of life events and the choice of research methods. Future research should expand on the following aspects, such as discrimination and integration of different models, the interaction between different attributions of life events and individuals’ as well as the diversification of research methods, etc.

Keywords life events      averaging/summation model      peak-end rule      mental accounting     
Corresponding Authors: WU Xinchun   
Issue Date: 15 March 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
CHEN Hongmin
WU Xinchun
Cite this article:   
CHEN Hongmin,ZHAO Lei,WU Xinchun. The Impact of Life Events on Emotional Reactions and Behavior Options: Theory Comparison and Research Implications[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 492-501.
URL:     OR
[1] PAN Xiaofu;WANG Zhaojing;GAO Fei;XU Ying. Irrational Consumption Bias of Windfall Gains and Hard-earned Money: Based on IAT and Evidence from an ERP Study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 596-605.
[2] WANG Zhou-Lan;GUAN Yi-Jie;YU Jin-Hong;YANG Rong-Rong. Irrational Phenomena in Temporal Decision-making[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 883-893.
[3] LI Ai-Mei;HAO Mei;LI Li;LING Wen-Quan. A New Perspective on Consumer Decision: Double-entry Mental Accounting Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1709-1717.
[4] ZHOU Jing;XU Fu-Ming;LIU Teng-Fei;ZHANG Jun-Wei;JIANG Duo. Influential Factors of Basic Features of Mental Accounting[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 124-131.
[5] ZHANG Zi-Chun;FAN Chun-Lei;WANG Xiao-Jia. Remembered Utility in Decision Making[J]. , 2010, 18(06): 865-870.
[6] ZHAO Yu-Fang;ZHAO Shou-Liang. Effects of Pre-earthquake Life Stress Events and Injury Severity on Post-Traumatic Disorder symptom of Middle School Students[J]. , 2009, 17(03): 511-515.
[7] Li Aimei;Ling Wenquan. Mental Accounting: Theory and the Application Inspiration[J]. , 2007, 15(05): 727-734.
[8] Zhang Ling. How the Psychological Variable Affected the Judgment of Value in Risky Decision-making?——Discussing about Kahneman’s Contributions[J]. , 2003, 11(03): 274-280.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech