Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2012, Vol. 20 Issue (12) : 1971-1979     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01971
Regular Articles |
‘Good Right and Bad Left’ or ‘Good Left and Bad Right’: The Relation Between Handedness and Space Affective Valence
YIN Rong;QU Fang-Bing;YE Hao-Sheng
(1 School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China) (2 The Center for Mind and Brain, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Download: PDF(212 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Good things and bad things are often associated with the right or the left, which is the affective valence of left space and right space. The studies basing on theories of embodied cognition and body-specificity hypothesis show that right-handers implicitly associate “good” with “right” and the opposite is true for left-handers. The motor experience of dominant hand and nondominant hand shape space valence. Space valence can be reversed as a result of changes in motor experience of dominant hand and nondominant hand. The brain areas that support approach motivation functionally are related to areas that support motor actions of dominant hand. Future research should focus on the relationship between the laterality of motivation and the laterality of manual motor control and determine how influences of cultural and bodily experiences combine to shape space valence.
Keywords embodied cognition      affective valence      body-specificity hypothesis      motor fluency     
Corresponding Authors: YE Hao-Sheng   
Issue Date: 15 December 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YIN Rong
QU Fang-Bing
YE Hao-Sheng
Cite this article:   
YIN Rong,QU Fang-Bing,YE Hao-Sheng. ‘Good Right and Bad Left’ or ‘Good Left and Bad Right’: The Relation Between Handedness and Space Affective Valence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(12): 1971-1979.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01971     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I12/1971
[1] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[2] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[3] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[4] LEE Hui-Min I.; WANG Ruo-Meng; WANG Quan-Hong; QIU Jiang. Handwriting Psychology in the Age of Computers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[5] Li Jinxing; Wang Zhenhong. Spatial-temporal Association of Response Codes Effect: Manifestation, Influencing Factors and Its Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 30-40.
[6] HAN Dong;YE Haosheng. Important Embodied in Weight: Weight’s Experience and Representation in Embodiment Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[7] CHEN Zhaorong;LI Ye. Embodied Social Relationship: Based on the Relational Models Frame[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.
[8] CHEN Yaping;LI Xiaodong. Infant’s Understanding of Actions: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.
[9] ZHANG Entao;FANG Jie;LIN Wenyi;LUO Junlong. Embodied Views of Abstract Concepts Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 429-436.
[10] YIN Rong;SU Dequan;YE Haosheng. Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Basing on Theories of Embodied Cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 220-234.
[11] YIN Rong;QU Fang-Bing;YE Hao-Sheng. Research on Embodied Theories of Conceptual Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1372-1381.
[12] QU Fang-Bing;Yin Rong;Zhong Yuan;YE Hao-Sheng. Motor Perception in Language Comprehension: Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 834-842.
[13] XIE Jiu-Shu;ZHANG Chang-Qing;WANG Rui-Ming;LU Zhi. Paradigms in the Study of Perceptual Symbol Systems[J]. , 2011, 19(9): 1293-1305.
[14] YE Hao-Sheng. Embodied Cognition: A New Approach in Cognitive Psychology[J]. , 2010, 18(05): 705-710.
[15] Lu zhongyi;Gao Zhihua;Duan Xiaoli;Liu Xuehua. Views of Embodied Language Comprehension[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 275-281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech