Please wait a minute...
   2009, Vol. 17 Issue (04) : 722-729     DOI:
|
Automatic Emotion Regulation: Sociocultural and Neuroscientific Considerations
FAN Zhao-Feng;YU Guo-Liang
Institute of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Download: PDF(748 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Most prior research has focused on deliberate forms of emotion regulation but left out an important aspect of emotion regulation, namely, automatic emotion regulation (AER), which is prevalent in our daily life. Similar to automatic processing, automatic emotion regulation works effectively on any aspect of one’s emotions without making a conscious decision to do so, without paying attention to the process of regulating one’s emotions, and without engaging in deliberate control. Antecedent-focused AER (those mostly taking place before the emotion is fully initiated) seems to be relatively adaptive while response-focused AER (those mostly taking place after an emotion is initiated) seems to be relatively maladaptive. The neural correlates of response-focused AER are different from antecedent-focused AER. The notion of an adaptive type of AER is in line with sociocultural considerations. Sociocultural context plays an important role in shaping AER. Cognitive processing within AER can become automatized with repeated cultural norms and practices.
Keywords automatic emotion regulation      cultural      neuroscience      antecedent-focused AER      response-focused AER     
Corresponding Authors: YU Guo-Liang   
Issue Date: 15 July 2009
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
FAN Zhao-Feng
YU Guo-Liang
Cite this article:   
FAN Zhao-Feng,YU Guo-Liang. Automatic Emotion Regulation: Sociocultural and Neuroscientific Considerations[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 722-729.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2009/V17/I04/722
[1] Yuanyuan SHI. Multicultural competence in a global milieu: Theoretic model, and application mechanism in cross-cultural collaboration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1108-1117.
[2] Jianping ZHANG, Chuanyan QIN, Shanshi LIU. Does seek feedback improve performance? A meta-analytic review about feedback-seeking behavior and individual performance[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 549-565.
[3] Zichen CHEN, He JIANG. Cultural competence in mental health services: Theoretical orientations and practical strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 661-672.
[4] Qian LI, Shiyang GONG, Chaofan LI. The impact of team cultural diversity on team innovation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539.
[5] Yi CAO, Xiaohu YANG. Speech perception in schizophrenia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1025-1035.
[6] Yuxin LIU, Chen CHEN, Nan ZHU, Zheng JI. A multi-level paradigm analysis of organizational neuroscience: the philosophical foundation, theoretical foundation, and research method[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1093-1110.
[7] Jixing YIN, Chuanpeng HU. Neuroscience bias: Reproducibility and exploration of psychological mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 1988-1995.
[8] Linjieqiong HUANG, Huiying LIU, Lei AN, Yanan LIU, Shu ZHANG, Caiyu JIN. Multicultural experience fosters creativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1511-1520.
[9] WANG Tong, HUANG Xiting.  Purpose in life: A perspective of psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 731-743.
[10] Cheng LUO, Xiaopeng REN. Ongoing voluntary settlement and independent agency: Evidence from several cultural tasks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1928-1934.
[11] Zihang HUANG, Yiming JING, Feng YU, Ruolei GU, Xinyue ZHOU, Jianxin ZHANG, Huajian CAI. Increasing individualism and decreasing collectivism? Cultural and psychological change around the globe[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2068-2080.
[12] Xiaomeng HU, Feng YU, Kaiping PENG. How does culture affect morality? The perspectives of between-culture variations, within-culture variations, and multiculturalism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2081-2090.
[13] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[14] MAMAT Marhaba, WU Yanhong.  The dynamic characteristic of self-construal: A polycultural perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1229-1239.
[15] PENG Luluo, ZHENG Xiaoying, PENG Siqing.  The status quo of culture mixing research and its future directions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1240-1250.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech