Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2012, Vol. 20 Issue (7) : 949-962     DOI:
Editor-In-Chief Invited |
Interactive Theory of Color Cognition and Its Evidence
ZHANG Ji-Jia;FANG Yan-Hong;XIE Shu-Shu
(1 Center for Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
(2 College of Education, Jinggangshan College, Jian 343009, China)
(3 Teacher Education College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China)
Download: PDF(242 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Color cognition is always the key topic of the debate of Linguistic Universalism and Linguistic Relativity. Because of the same structure of human eyes, and the similar sense to spectrum, General theory of evolution, which supports the view of Linguistic Universalism, claims that color cognition is not affected by language and mutually independent of color words, whereas Language relevance hypothesis, which is the main hypothesis about Linguistic Relativity, argued that color cognition can be affected by color words. Although both General theory of evolution and Language relevance hypothesis have their own evidence, the two theories also have disadvantages. Thus, a compromised view became to be popular in the relation of color words and color cognition. Recent studies about this topic of Chinese research showed that color cognition is a jointed result of physical, physiological, cognitive, intelligent, linguistic and culture which have a relationship of interactive and compensation. Evidence came from research about the regular Han nationality, individuals who are blind, mentally handicapped, or deaf, and individuals of other nationalities in China. In this paper, an Interactive theory of six factors was proposed to solve the recent argument of Linguistic Universalism and Linguistic Relativity. In this theory, six factors are divided into three hierarchies: (1) physical-biological level. In this level, color cognition is mainly affected by physical properties of colors and biological properties of human eyes; (2) cognitive-intelligent level. Cognition, including perception, memory, thoughts, and intelligence are involved in this level. (3) social-cultural level. Color cognition can be affected by cultures of colors, such as color preference. Interactions among three hierarchies including six factors determine how people cognize colors. In addition, influence of language can be found in both cognitive-intelligent level and social-cultural level. In short, color cognition is a complicated psychological phenomenon which includes multi-factors and multi-levels. It is integrated by objectives and subjective, perception and conception, universality and individuality, humanity and national characters. No levels or factors should be ignored.
Keywords color      color words      interactive theory     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Ji-Jia   
Issue Date: 15 July 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Ji-Jia
FANG Yan-Hong
XIE Shu-Shu
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Ji-Jia,FANG Yan-Hong,XIE Shu-Shu. Interactive Theory of Color Cognition and Its Evidence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(7): 949-962.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I7/949
[1] Ye Liu; Jiapeng Yin; Zheyuan Chen; Ian Max Andolina; Wei Wang. Red Predominance of Gamma band Power in Macaque V1 and V4[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 92-.
[2] WU Xuanna. Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1147-1158.
[3] LI Yan; YANG Baiyin. Idea implementation: The trend of innovation research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 643-653.
[4] ZHANG Quan; CHEN Zheng; WANG Weiwen; DENG Huihua. Temporal characteristics of change in HPA activity among PTSD patients[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 536-546.
[5] LI Xiao-Ming; HE Ping; LIU Lin-Ying. Red graphical effect in risk avoidance behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 351-355.
[6] WANG Juan;ZHANG Ji-Jia. Color Terms and Color Cognition: Based on the Perspective of National Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1159-1168.
[7] TANG Dan-Dan;LIU Pei-Duo;CHEN An-Tao. A Profile of Conflict Types in the Color-Word Stroop Task[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(12): 1962-1970.
[8] WEI Xiao-Yan;CHEN Bao-Guo. The Influence of Language on Perception: Evidence from Categorical Perception of Color[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 35-41.
[9] CHENG Da-Zhi;SUI Guang-Yuan;CHEN Chun-Ping. The Cognitive Neuroscience Mechanisms of Synesthesia[J]. , 2009, 17(05): 944-950.
[10] Xu Xingyuan;Cai Houde. Brain Mechanism of Developmental Stuttering[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 326-332.
[11] Liu Haoming,Zhang Jijia,Liu Lihong. Relationship between Color Terms and Color Cognition[J]. , 2005, 13(01): 10-16.
[12] Wen Junqing, Han Buxin, Sun Xiuru, Sun Pei,Liu Yuhua, Li Donghui. The Dual-Rayleigh Match And The Measurement Of Color Vision[J]. , 2003, 11(06): 623-628.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech