Please wait a minute...
   2012, Vol. 20 Issue (4) : 542-551     DOI:
研究前沿 |
Relationships Between Mathematical Ability and Decision Making: A Perspective of Individual Difference
ZHOU Zheng;XIN Zi-Qiang
(1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
(2 Department of Psychology at School of Social Development, Central University of Finance and Economics,
Beijing 100081, China)
Download: PDF(228 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Though in similar conditions, different people make diversified decisions. Such variance may derive from different levels of mathematical ability, which includes numeracy, quantity representation, probability inference, and numerical heuristics. Researchers have adopted two distinguishing paradigms in order to take an insight to the influence of mathematical ability. The most commonly used paradigm is the correlation method through which mathematical ability is regarded as an external correlate factor of decision-making; the other is the component paradigm which is applied to identify specific mathematical ability components involved in a decision-making process. Debates of the recent research lie in not only the role of mathematical ability and general cognition in decision-making, but also whether mathematical ability consistently makes a positive contribution to decision-making. Dual-system theory and fuzzy-trace theory could offer a framework for the explanation of individual difference in decision-making. Further research should focus on clarifying the above-mentioned controversy, developing a more efficient research paradigm and an unified explanation framework, as well as discovering methods to help people improve decision performance.
Keywords decision-making      mathematical ability      individual difference      dual-system theory      fuzzy-trace theory     
Corresponding Authors: XIN Zi-Qiang   
Issue Date: 15 April 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHOU Zheng
XIN Zi-Qiang
Cite this article:   
ZHOU Zheng,XIN Zi-Qiang. Relationships Between Mathematical Ability and Decision Making: A Perspective of Individual Difference[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 542-551.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I4/542
[1] XU Fu-ming, ZHANG Hui, MA Hong-yu, DENG Ying, Shi Yan-wei, LI Ou.  The poverty problem: Based on psychological perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[2] GUO Xiuyan, ZHENG Li, CHENG Xuemei, LIU Yingjie, LI Lin.  The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 903-911.
[3] YANG Jianfeng; MING Xiaodong. The process and antecedents of team ethical decision-making: A study in Chinese context[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 542-552.
[4] Shan Xu; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Yiying Song; Jia Liua. Game-based assessment on visuospatial ability in a large population of human participants: an Internet-based big-data approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 14-.
[5] GU Ruolei; XU Pengfei; XU Rui; SHI Yuanyuan; YANG Ziyan; WANG Yuqi; CAI Huajian. The role played by anxiety in reward learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 475-483.
[6] LUO Yuanjing; DU Jing. The role of informal information prior to organizational change[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1819-1828.
[7] ZHANG Wei; ZHANG Zhen; GAO Yu; DUAN Huaping; WU Xingnan. The theoretical models and brain mechanisms of interpersonal trust game during economic decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1780-1791.
[8] MIAO Xiuying; CHI Lizhong. Regulatory fit in the field of sport behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1811-1818.
[9] CHEN Ting; SUN Xiaomin. Shared information bias in group decision-making: Based on hidden profile paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 132-142.
[10] FENG Xue; PENG Kaiping. Skill or Style: Two Approaches to Measure Individual Differences on Rational Thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559.
[11] JIANG Ronghuan; LI Xiaodong. Developmental Reversals in False Memory: Why the More Grown up the More Fallible?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1371-1379.
[12] WANG Yan; YANG Juan. The Modulation Effect of Personality Traits on the #br# Psychosocial Stress Response[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460.
[13] ZHANG Xiuping; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Neural Mechanism and Influential Factors of Semantic Unification in Discourse Comprehension[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141.
[14] QIU Fanghui; LUO Yuejia; JIA Shiwei. Categorical Perception of Facial Expression and Its Individual Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 946-958.
[15] ZUO Tingting; HU Qingfen. Spatial Cognitive Style and Its Relationship with Spatial Abilities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 959-966.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech