Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (4) : 535-548     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00535
Conceptual Framework |
The influence and mechanism of self-construal on consumers’ preference for polarizing products
WU Lihui()
School of Tourism Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Download: PDF(818 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Polarizing products are those that are liked by some but hated by others. With the advent of the individualized consumption era, it is increasingly common for products that meet individual needs to receive mixed reviews. How do consumers perceive polarizing products? What factors influence consumers’ preference for polarizing products? What is the mechanism and boundary condition? The answers to these questions are significant for firms to engage in effective marketing. Polarization of word of mouth will improve consumers’ perceived risk and lead to “conflict” association. It may also generate perceived uniqueness of the product. These product features correspond to the behavior differences in need for uniqueness, conflict resolution style, and regulatory focus between independent and interdependent self-construal from the self-construal theory. Therefore, self-construal is an important antecedent variable that influences consumers’ preference for polarizing products and the need for uniqueness, conflict resolution style, as well as regulatory focus mediate this relationship. In addition, level of shopping risk, shopping tasks (self-purchase versus other-purchase), public or private context, and product category are the boundary conditions of this mediating effect.

Keywords self-construal      word of mouth      polarizing product      need for uniqueness      conflict resolution style     
ZTFLH:  B849: F713.55  
Corresponding Authors: Lihui WU     E-mail: wulihui0203@163.com
Issue Date: 24 February 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Lihui WU
Cite this article:   
Lihui WU. The influence and mechanism of self-construal on consumers’ preference for polarizing products[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 535-548.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00535     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I4/535
  
1 杜晓梦, 赵占波, 崔晓 . ( 2015). 评论效价、新产品类型与调节定向对在线评论有用性的影响. 心理学报, 47( 4), 555-568.
2 杜学美, 丁璟妤, 谢志鸿, 雷丽芳 . ( 2016). 在线评论对消费者购买意愿的影响研究. 管理评论, 28( 3), 173-183.
3 龚诗阳, 刘霞, 刘洋, 赵平 . ( 2012). 网络口碑决定产品命运吗——对线上图书评论的实证分析. 南开管理评论, 15( 4), 118-128.
4 郝媛媛, 叶强, 李一军 . ( 2010). 基于影评数据的在线评论有用性影响因素研究. 管理科学学报, 13( 8), 78-88.
5 黄敏学, 李萍, 王艺婷 . ( 2016). 新产品评论不一致一定是坏事吗?——基于社会价值视角. 营销科学学报, 12( 3). 36-50.
6 黄敏学, 王艺婷, 廖俊云, 刘茂红 . ( 2017). 评论不一致性对消费者的双面影响: 产品属性与调节定向的调节. 心理学报, 49( 3), 370-382.
7 李东进, 张成虎, 马明龙 . ( 2016). 脱销情境下消费者会购买相似品吗——自我建构视角的分析. 南开管理评论, 19( 3), 10-21.
8 李琪, 马凯, 阮燕雅 . ( 2014). 负面评论和评级的不一致性对感知有用性的影响研究——以产品类型作为调节变量. 软科学, 28( 4), 102-106.
9 李信, 陈毅文 . ( 2016). 口碑追加形式对购买意向的影响: 口碑方向的调节作用. 心理学报, 48( 6), 722-732.
10 刘艳 . ( 2011). 自我建构研究的现状与展望. 心理科学进展, 19( 3), 427-439.
url: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/article487.shtml
11 卢向华, 冯越 . ( 2009). 网络口碑的价值——基于在线餐馆点评的实证研究. 管理世界, ( 7), 126-132.
12 宋晓兵, 徐珂欣, 吴育振 . ( 2017). 用户设计能否包打天下? ——自我建构对用户设计产品偏好的影响研究. 管理世界, ( 5), 119-130.
13 王海忠, 范孝雯, 欧阳建颖 . ( 2017). 消费者自我构念、独特性需求与品牌标识形状偏好. 心理学报, 49( 8), 1113-1124.
14 王海忠, 王骏旸, 罗捷彬 . ( 2012). 要素品牌策略与产品独特性评价: 自我建构和产品性质的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 15( 4), 111-117.
15 熊素红, 景奉杰 . ( 2009). 自我建构对群体购买环境中冲动性购买行为的影响. 情报杂志, 28( 11), 198-202.
16 杨颖, 朱毅 . ( 2016). 谁该成为体验型产品网络评论的主角, 图片还是文字? 心理学报, 48( 8), 1026-1036.
17 姚卿, 陈荣, 赵平 . ( 2011). 自我构念对想象广告策略的影响与分析. 心理学报, 43( 6), 674-683.
18 殷国鹏 . ( 2012). 消费者认为怎样的在线评论更有用? ——社会性因素的影响效应. 管理世界, ( 12), 115-124.
19 余航, 王战平 . ( 2013). 网络口碑影响的研究综述. 情报杂志, 32( 6), 100-106.
20 岳中刚, 王晓亚 . ( 2015). 在线评论与消费者行为的研究进展与趋势展望. 软科学, ( 6), 90-93.
21 曾世强, 陈健, 吕巍, 潘黎 . ( 2016). 独立自我“啬于人”, 相依自我“啬于己”——为自己消费还是为他人消费与自我建构对储蓄和消费选择的影响. 管理评论, 28( 6), 119-130.
22 张艳辉, 李宗伟 . ( 2016). 在线评论有用性的影响因素研究: 基于产品类型的调节效应. 管理评论, 28( 10), 123-132.
23 张艳辉, 李宗伟, 赵诣成 . ( 2017). 基于淘宝网评论数据的信息质量对在线评论有用性的影响. 管理学报, 14( 1), 77-85.
24 Aaker, J., & Schmitt, B . ( 2001). Culture-dependent assimilation and differentiation of the self: Preferences for consumption symbols in the United States and China. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 32( 5), 561-576.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005003
25 Arndt, J . ( 1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4( 3), 291-295.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224376700400308
26 Babin B. J., Darden W. R., & Griffin M . ( 1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20( 4), 644-656.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209376
27 Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W . ( 1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71( 1), 83-93.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
28 Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C . ( 2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumers’ evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28( 3), 439-449.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/323731
29 Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M . ( 2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 3), 553-563.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.3.553
30 Chen, Z., & Berger, J. ( 2013). When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 40(3), 580-593.
31 Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D .( 2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 43(3), 345-354.
32 Chintagunta P. K., Gopinath S., & Venkataraman S . ( 2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box-office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29( 5), 944-957.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0572
33 Cui G., Lui H.-K., & Guo X. N . ( 2012). The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17( 1), 39-58.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=24671564
34 Duan W. J., Gu B., & Whinston A. B . ( 2008). Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45 ( 4), 1007-1016.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=14168484
35 Duclos, R., & Barasch, A . ( 2014). Prosocial behavior in intergroup relations: How donor self-construal and recipient group-membership shape generosity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 1), 93-108.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=23098580
36 Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R . ( 2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32( 3), 378-389.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/497549
37 Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L . ( 1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing, 31( 4), 22-27.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224296703100405
38 Hamilton, R. W., & Biehal, G. J . ( 2005). Achieving your goals or protecting their future? The effects of self-view on goals and choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 32( 2), 277-283.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/432237
39 He, S. X., & Bond, S. D . ( 2015). Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 6), 1509-1527.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/680667
40 Higgins, E. T . ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52( 12), 1280-1300.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
41 Higgins E. T., Friedman R. S., Harlow R. E., Idson L. C., Ayduk O. N., & Taylor A . ( 2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31( 1), 3-23.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
42 Hirschman, E. C., Holbrook, M. B . ( 1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46( 3):92-101.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600210
43 Hofstede, G . ( 1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10( 4), 15-41.
url: http://dx.doi.org/national Studies of Management
44 Hsee C. K., Yang Y., Gu Y. J., & Jie C . ( 2009). Specification seeking: How product specifications influence consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 35 ( 6), 952-966.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593947
45 Kim W. G., Lim H. J., & Brymer R. A . ( 2015). The effectiveness of managing social media on hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 165-171.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.014
46 Kühnen, U., & Hannover, B . ( 2000). Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self-construal activation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30( 6), 799-811.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<799::AID-EJSP16>3.0.CO;2-2
47 Lalwani, A. K., & Shavitt, S . ( 2013). You get what you pay for? Self-construal influences price-quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 40( 2), 255-267.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=20016331
48 Lascu, D. N . ( 1991). Consumer guilt: Examining the potential of a new marketing construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 290-295.
49 Lee A. Y., Aaker J. L., & Gardner W. L . ( 2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78( 6), 1122-1134.
url: http://dx.doi.org/al of Personality
50 Levi-Strauss, C . ( 1972). Structuralism and Ecology. Social Science Information, 12 ( 1), 7-23.
51 Liu, Y . ( 2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70( 3), 74-89.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.3.074
52 Lu, L., & Gilmour, R . ( 2007). Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 41( 1), 249-257.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=14307128
53 Luo X. M., Wiles M., & Raithel S . ( 2013). Make the most of a polarizing brand. Harvard Business Review, 91( 11), 29-31.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=19896956
54 Maimaran, M., & Simonson, I . ( 2011). Multiple routes to self-versus other-expression in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 48( 4), 755-766.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.4.755
55 Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S . ( 1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98( 2), 224-253.
56 Mitchell, V.-W . ( 1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33( 1/2), 163-195.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229
57 Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D . ( 2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. Com. MIS Quarterly, 34( 1), 185-200.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20721420
58 Neto, F., & Mullet, E . ( 2004). Personality, self-esteem, and self-construal as correlates of forgivingness. European Journal of Personality, 18( 1), 15-30.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.500
59 Nisbett R. E., Peng K., Choi I., & Norenzayan A . ( 2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108( 2), 291-310.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
60 Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E . ( 1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54( 9), 741-754.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741
61 Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V . ( 2015). Perceived risk, product returns, and optimal resource allocation: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 52( 2), 268-285.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0174
62 Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T . ( 1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Reasearch, 11( 1):668-672.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209003
63 Singelis, T. M . ( 1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20( 5), 580-591.
url: http://dx.doi.org/nality
64 Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L . ( 1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86( 5), 518-527.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.86.5.518
65 Song, D., & Lee, J . ( 2013). Balancing “We” and “I”: Self-construal and an alternative approach to seeking uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12( 6), 506-516.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cb.1455
66 Spencer-rodgers J., Williams M. J., & Peng K . ( 2010). Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 14( 3), 296-312.
url: http://dx.doi.org/nality
67 Sun, M . ( 2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58( 4), 696-707.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=25064115
68 Rozenkrants B., Wheeler S. C., & Shiv B . ( 2017). Self-expression cues in product rating distributions: When people prefer polarizing products. Journal of Consumer Research, 44( 4), 759-777.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx067
69 Tian, K. T., & McKenzie, K . ( 2001). The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10( 3), 171-193.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_5
70 Ting-Toomey S., Oetzel J. G., & Yee-Jung K . ( 2001). Self-construal types and conflict management styles. Communication Reports, 14( 2), 87-104.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210109367741
71 Trafimow D., Triandis H. C., & Goto S. G . ( 1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60( 5), 649-655.
url: http://dx.doi.org/al of Personality
72 Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D . ( 2009). Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management, 30( 1), 123-127.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=15416135
73 Wang F., Liu X. F., & Fang E . ( 2015). User reviews variance, critic reviews variance, and product sales: An exploration of customer breadth and depth effects. Journal of Retailing, 91( 3), 372-389.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.04.007
74 Wang J., Zhu R., & Shiv B . ( 2012). The lonely consumer: Loner or conformer? Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 6), 1116-1128.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=24949683
75 Westbrook, R. A . ( 1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24( 3), 258-270.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400302
76 Wu, L., & Lee, C . ( 2016). Limited edition for me and best seller for you: The impact of scarcity versus popularity cues on self versus other-purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 92( 4), 486-499.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.001
77 Zhang Y. L., Feick L., & Price L. J . ( 2006). The impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32( 6), 794-805.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167206286626
78 Zhu, F., & Zhang, X . ( 2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74( 2), 133-148.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.133
[1] MAMAT Marhaba, WU Yanhong.  The dynamic characteristic of self-construal: A polycultural perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1229-1239.
[2] WANG Caiyu; LEI Li. The connotation, influence factors and mechanism of herding effect in online shopping context[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 298-311.
[3] YANG Shuai;HUANG Xi-Ting;WANG Xiao-Gang;YIN Tian-Zi. Neural Mechanism of Cultural Influences on the Self-construal[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 149-157.
[4] LIU Yan. Self-Construal: Review and Prospect[J]. , 2011, 19(3): 427-439.
[5] GAO Liang;ZHENG Xue;YAN Biao-Bin. The Differences of Well-being Between the East and the West: from the View of Self-construal[J]. , 2010, 18(07): 1041-1045.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech