Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (1) : 178-190     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00178
Research Method |
Network analysis and its applications in psychology
CAI Yuqing1(), DONG Shuyang2, YUAN Shuai3, HU Chuan-Peng4,5()
1 Department of Humanity, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2 Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht,3584CS, Netherland
3 Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, 5037AB, Netherland
4 German Resilience Center, Mainz, 55131, Germany
5 Neuroimaging Center (NIC), University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55131, Germany
Download: PDF(967 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Network analysis models (or Network Psychometrics) have been widely used in psychology research in recent years. Unlike latent variable models which conceive observable variables as outcomes of unobservable latent factors, network analysis models apply the graph theory to construct a network to depict the associations among observable variables. The observable variables are treated as nodes and the associations between them are treated as edges. As such, network analysis models reveal the relationships among observable variables and the dynamic system resulted from the interactions between these observable variables. With indices reflecting individual nodes’ characteristics (such as centrality) and network structural characteristics (such as small-worldness), network analysis models provide a new perspective for visualization and for studying various psychological phenomena. In the past decade, network analysis models have been applied in the fields of personality, social, and clinical psychology as well as psychiatry. Future research should continue to develop and improve the methods of network analysis models, making them applicable to more types of data and broader research fields.

Keywords network analysis      latent variable      psychometrics      psychopathology      personality traits     
:  B841  
Corresponding Authors: Yuqing CAI,Chuan-Peng HU     E-mail: cyq_2016@outlook.com;hcp4715@hotmail.com
Issue Date: 21 November 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Yuqing CAI
Shuyang DONG
Shuai YUAN
Chuan-Peng HU
Cite this article:   
Yuqing CAI,Shuyang DONG,Shuai YUAN, et al. Network analysis and its applications in psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 178-190.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00178     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I1/178
  
  
1 胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平 . ( 2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题:从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1504-1518.
2 Afzali M. H., Sunderland M., Teesson M., Carragher N., Mills K ,& Slade, T. .( 2017).A network approach to the comorbidity between posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder: The role of overlapping symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 208, 490-496. 2016. 10. 037
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.
3 American Psychiatric Association . ( 1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed). Washington, DC:Author.
4 American Psychiatric Association . ( 2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed, text rev.). Washington, DC:Author.
5 American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (5th ed). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
6 Bekhuis E., Schoevers R., de Boer M., Peen J., Dekker J., van H., & Boschloo L . ( 2018). Symptom-Specific effects of psychotherapy versus combined therapy in the treatment of mild to moderate depression: A network approach. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 87( 2), 121-123.
url: https://doi.org/10.1159/000486793
7 Blanken T. F., van Der Zweerde T., van Straten A., van Someren, E. J. W., Borsboom D., & Lancee J . ( 2019). Introducing network intervention analysis to investigate sequential, symptom-specific treatment effects: A demonstration in co-occurring insomnia and depression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 88(1),52-54.
url: https://doi.org/10.1159/000495045
8 Borgatti S. P., Mehra A., Brass D. J., & Labianca G . ( 2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916),892-895. . 1165821
url: https://doi.org/10.1126/science
9 Borsboom ,D.( 2008). Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(9),1089-1108.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20503
10 Borsboom ,D. ( 2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1),5-13.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375
11 BorsboomD., &Cramer A. O.J, . ( 2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1),91-121.
url: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
12 Borsboom D., Cramer A. O. J., Schmittmann V. D., Epskamp S., & Waldorp L. J . ( 2011). The small world of psychopathology. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27407.
url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027407
13 Borsboom D., Fried E. I., Epskamp S., Waldorp L. J., van Borkulo C. D .,van der Maas, H. L. J.,& Cramer, A. O. J. ( 2017). False alarm? A comprehensive reanalysis of “Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability” by Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126(7),989-999.
url: https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000306
14 Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G. J., & Heerden J. van . ( 2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2),203-219. 2. 203
url: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.
15 Borsboom D., Robinaugh D. J ., The Psychosystems Group, Rhemtulla, M., & Cramer, A. O. J.( 2018). Robustness and replicability of psychopathology networks. World Psychiatry, 17(2),143-144.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20515
16 Boschloo L., van Borkulo C. D., Rhemtulla M., Keyes K. M., Borsboom D., & Schoevers R. A . ( 2015). The network structure of symptoms of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. PLoS ONE, 10( 9),e0137621. 0137621
url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
17 Brandt M. J., Sibley C. G., & Osborne D . ( 2019). What is central to political belief system networks? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45( 9), 1352-1364.
url: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354
18 Bringmann L. F., Vissers N., Wichers M., Geschwind N., Kuppens P., Peeters F., … Tuerlinckx F . ( 2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS ONE, 8( 4), e60188.
url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060188
19 Bulteel K., Tuerlinckx F., Brose A ., & Ceulemans E.( 2018).Improved insight into and prediction of network dynamics by combining VAR and dimension reduction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8 2018. 1516540
20 Cao X., Wang L., Cao C., Fang R., Chen C., Hall B. J., & Elhai J. D . ( 2019). Sex differences in global and local connectivity of adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(2),216-224.
url: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12963
21 Costantini G., Epskamp S., Borsboom D., Perugini M., Mõttus R., Waldorp L. J ., & Cramer A. O. J.( 2015). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality,54, 13-29.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003
22 Costantini G., Richetin J., Borsboom D., Fried E. I., Rhemtulla M., & Perugini M . ( 2015). Development of indirect measures of conscientiousness: Combining a facets approach and network analysis. European Journal of Personality, 29(5),548-567.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2014
23 Costantini G., Richetin J., Preti E., Casini E., Epskamp S ., & Perugini M.( 2019). Stability and variability of personality networks. A tutorial on recent developments in network psychometrics. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 68-78.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011
24 Cramer A. O. J., van der Sluis S., Noordhof A., Wichers M., Geschwind N., Aggen S. H., … Borsboom D . ( 2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people: Dimensions of normal personality as networks. European Journal of Personality, 26(4),414-431.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866
25 Cramer A. O. J., Waldorp L. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Borsboom D . ( 2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3),137-150.
url: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991567
26 Dalege J., Borsboom D., van Harreveld F., van den Berg H., Conner M .,& van der Maas H. L. J. .,( 2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The causal attitude network (CAN) model. Psychological Review, 123(1),2-22.
url: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039802
27 Dalege, J., Borsboom ,D., van Harreveld, F., & van der Maas, H. L. J .( 2018). The attitudinal entropy (AE) framework as a general theory of individual attitudes. Psychological Inquiry, 29 2018. 1537246
28 Di Pierro,R., Costantini, G., Benzi, I. M. A., Madeddu, F., & Preti, E.( 2018). Grandiose and entitled, but still fragile: A network analysis of pathological narcissistic traits. . Personality and Individual Differences, 140, 15-20.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.003
29 Epskamp S., Rhemtulla M., & Borsboom D . ( 2017). Generalized network psychometrics: Combining network and latent variable models. Psychometrika, 82(4),904-927.
url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9557-x
30 Epskamp S., Waldorp L. J., Mõttus R .,&Borsboom D.( 2018). The gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(4)453-480 .
url: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823
31 ErdősP., &Rényi, A . ( 1959). On Random Graphs. I. Publicationes Mathematicae., 6, 290-297.
32 FreemanL.C., . ( 1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3),215-239. (78) 90021-7
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733
33 Fried E. I., Bockting C., Arjadi R., Borsboom D., Amshoff M., Cramer A. O. J., … Stroebe M . ( 2015). From loss to loneliness: The relationship between bereavement and depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(2),256-265.
url: https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000028
34 Fried E. I., van Borkulo C. D., Cramer A. O. J., Boschloo L., Schoevers R. A., & Borsboom D . ( 2017). Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(1),1-10.
url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z
35 Friedman J., Hastie T., & Tibshirani R . ( 2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3),432-441.
url: https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045
36 HaslbeckJ. M.., &Fried E.I, . ( 2017). How predictable are symptoms in psychopathological networks? A reanalysis of 18 published datasets. Psychological Medicine, 47(16),2767-2776.
url: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717001258
37 HaslbeckJ. M.., &Waldorp L.J, . ( 2015. MGM: Estimating Time-Varying Mixed Graphical Models in High-Dimensional Data. Retrieved March 19, 2019 from
url: http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.06871
38 Hyatt C. S., Sleep C. E., Lamkin J., Maples-Keller J. L., Sedikides C., Campbell W. K., & Miller J. D . ( 2018). Narcissism and self-esteem: A nomological network analysis. PLoS ONE, 13( 8), e0201088.
url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201088
39 Isvoranu A.-M., van Borkulo C. D., Boyette L.-L., Wigman J. T. W., Vinkers C. H., Borsboom D., & Group Investigators . ( 2017). A network approach to psychosis: Pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(1),187-196.
url: https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw055
40 JonesD.., &Figueredo A.J, . ( 2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark. European Journal of Personality, 27(6),521-531.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1893
41 Lauritzen S. L. ( 1996). Graphical models. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
42 LazarsfeldP.., &Henry N.W, . ( 1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mill.
43 LevineM., &Davidson E.H, . ( 2005). Gene regulatory networks for development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(14),4936-4942.
url: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408031102
44 Liu Q., Fei W., Yan W., Peng K., Sui J., & Hu C . ( 2019). Questionnaire data from the revision of a Chinese Version of Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale and Experiments on the Perceptual Prioritization of the Good Self.
url: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7ngey
45 Marcus D. K., Preszler J .,& Zeigler-Hill V.( 2018). A network of dark personality traits: What lies at the heart of darkness? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 56-62
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.003
46 McCraeR.., &Costa P. T.Jr, . ( 2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol.1, pp. 273-294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
url: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462
47 McNally R.J.( 2016). Can network analysis transform psychopathology? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 95-104.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006
48 McNally R. J., Robinaugh D. J., Wu G. W. Y., Wang L., Deserno M. K., & Borsboom D . ( 2015). Mental disorders as causal systems: A network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(6),836-849.
url: https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614553230
49 Milgram,S. ( 1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1( 1), 61-67.
50 MillarR.B., . ( 2011). Latent variable models. In Maximum likelihood estimation and inference (pp. 202-232). Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470094846.ch10
51 Nagel M., Watanabe K., Stringer S., Posthuma D .,& van der Sluis S. .,( 2018). Item-level analyses reveal genetic heterogeneity in neuroticism. Nature Communications, 9, Article 905.
url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03242-8
52 NewmanM. E.J., . ( 2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2),404-409.
url: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
53 NewmanM. E.J., . ( 2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2),167-256.
url: https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
54 Open Science Collaboration . ( 2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716.
url: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
55 Opsahl T., Agneessens F .,&Skvoretz, J.( 2010).Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006
56 OpsahlT., &Panzarasa, P . ( 2009). Clustering in weighted networks. Social Networks, 31( 2),155-163.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.002
57 ParkH.-J., &Friston, K . ( 2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342( 6158), 1238411-1238411.
url: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238411
58 Pourahmadi,M.( 2011). Covariance estimation: The GLM and regularization perspectives. Statistical Science, 26( 3), 369-387.
url: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-sts358
59 Rhemtulla M ., van Bork , R., & Cramer, A.O. J. (in press). Cross-lagged network models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Retrived April 15, 2019 from
url: https://osf.io/r24q6/
60 Ruzzano L., Borsboom D., & Geurts H. M . ( 2015). Repetitive behaviors in autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder: New perspectives from a network analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45( 1), 192-202.
url: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2204-9
61 Santos H. P., Kossakowski J. J., Schwartz T. A., Beeber L., & Fried E. I . ( 2018). Longitudinal network structure of depression symptoms and self-efficacy in low-income mothers. PLoS ONE, 13( 1), e0191675. 0191675
url: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.
62 SchmittmannV.., CramerA.O J. ., Waldorp, L. J., Epskamp, S., Kievit, R. A., & Borsboom, D.(2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena.New Ideas in Psychology , 31(1), 43-53.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007
63 SpornsO., &Honey C.J, . ( 2006). Small worlds inside big brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103( 51), 19219-19220.
url: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609523103
64 TeichmannS.., &Babu M.M, . ( 2004). Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nature Genetics, 36( 5), 492-496.
url: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1340
65 Tio P., Epskamp S., Noordhof A., & Borsboom D . ( 2016). Mapping the manuals of madness: Comparing the ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR using a network approach. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25( 4), 267-276.
url: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.1503
66 TraversJ., &Milgram, S . ( 1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32( 4), 425-443.
url: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786545
67 van Borkulo C. D., Borsboom D., Epskamp S., Blanken T. F., Boschloo L., Schoevers R. A., & Waldorp L. J . ( 2014). A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific Reports, 4 , (5918), 152-167.
url: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05918
68 van Borkulo C. D., Boschloo L., Kossakowski J. J., Tio P., Schoevers R., Borsboom D., & Waldorp L . ( 2016). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Submitted. Retrived March 19, 2019 from
url: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314750838_Comparing_network_structures_on_three_aspects_A_permutation_test
69 Wechsler S. M., Benson N., Machado W. D. L., Bachert C. M. D., & Gums E. F . ( 2018). Adult temperament styles: A network analysis of their relationships with the Big Five Personality Model. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 11( 1),.
url: https://doi.org/10.30552/ejep.v11i1.186
70 World Health Organization ( WHO). (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research (ICD-10).Geneva:Author.
71 Xia M ., & He Y.(2017). Functional connectomics from a “big data” perspective. NeuroImage, 160, 152-167.
url: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.031
[1] YOU Yuan, WANG Li. Cognitive neurological process associated with behavioral inhibition and psychopathology in children[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 612-625.
[2] ZHANG Huoyin, ZHANG Mingming, DING Rui, LI Shuaixia, LUO Wenbo. “Parental brain” network and its influential factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1072-1084.
[3] Meng-Cheng WANG, Xiangyang BI. Regression mixture modeling: Advances in method and its implementation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2272-2280.
[4] DENG Xiaoping, XU Chen, CHENG Maowei, ZHANG Xiangkui.  Peer selection and peer influence: A meta-analysis on social network based research on adolescent delinquency[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1898-1909.
[5] WANG Meng-Cheng, DENG Qiaowen, BI Xiangyang.  Latent variable modeling using Bayesian methods[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(10): 1682-1695.
[6] WANG Ming; JIANG Guangrong. Emotional disorders and their interventions: #br# A perspective of mental imagery[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 573-590.
[7] WANG Yan; YANG Juan. The Modulation Effect of Personality Traits on the #br# Psychosocial Stress Response[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460.
[8] GAO Riguang. Antecedents and Consequences of leader Integrity: A longitudinal Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2042-2053.
[9] ZHAO Yuhan; YU Lin. Personality Traits and Cognitive Ability: Age Differences in Their Relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1924-1934.
[10] LI Feng;ZHU Bin-Yu;XIN Tao. The Specialty Visualization Study of Psychometrics in Recent 15 Years:
An Analysis Based on Citespace Ⅱ
[J]. , 2012, 20(7): 1128-1138.
[11] HU Chao;FU Gen-Yue. “Perceive One’s Character through His Voice”: The Relationship between Speech Spectrum and Personality Traits[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 809-813.
[12] MA Shao-Qi;JIAO Can;ZHANG Min-Qiang. Application of Social Network Analysis in Psychology[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 755-764.
[13] WU Yan;WEN Zhong-Lin. Item Parceling Strategies in Structural Equation Modeling[J]. , 2011, 19(12): 1859-1867.
[14] WEN Zhong-Lin;WU Yan. Evolution and Simplification of the Approaches to Estimating Structural Equation Models with Latent Interaction[J]. , 2010, 18(08): 1306-1313.
[15] ZHANG Zhong-Liang; ZHANG Zhong-Ming; LI Hong. Cognitive-Behavioral Psychopathology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder[J]. , 2010, 18(02): 306-313.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech