Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (9) : 1585-1595     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01585
Regular Articles |
The application of multiple object tracking in the evaluation and training of different populations
Taian LI1,Yu ZHANG1,Jie LI2,1()
1. School of Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China
2. Institutes of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
Download: PDF(662 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) is mainly used to explore visual attention and memory for multiple objects in dynamic contexts. Earlier studies focused on the influencing factors and processing mechanisms of the tracking process. An increasing number of recent studies have used MOT to evaluate and train different populations, including children, the elderly, patients with neurodevelopmental conditions, drivers, athletes, video game players, and other occupational groups. In general, a trend has emerged whereby the better the performance of MOT, the better the professional performance in complex and fast dynamic contexts. Conversely, poorer performance of MOT indicates that cognitive functioning may be immature or declining. In addition, MOT can also be used as a means of cognitive training to improve the cognitive function of the elderly and patients with neurodevelopmental conditions and improve the professional performance of various occupational groups. MOT should be considered for future use as it has enormous potential as a method of evaluation and training. This can be further improved in various ways, including strengthening the simulated training of special occupational groups, expanding the target populations, combining MOT with stereoscopic vision and real scenes, taking physical activities during MOT, exploring MOT with multi-person cooperation, and using MOT for the evaluation and training of emotional and social functions.

Keywords Multiple Object Tracking      psychological evaluation      cognitive training      attention     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Jie LI     E-mail: lijie.psy@foxmail.com
Issue Date: 24 July 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Taian LI
Yu ZHANG
Jie LI
Cite this article:   
Taian LI,Yu ZHANG,Jie LI. The application of multiple object tracking in the evaluation and training of different populations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1585-1595.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01585     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2019/V27/I9/1585
1 龚然, 陈听, 岳小祺, 肖义然, 张禹 . (2016). 不同运动强度对篮球运动员多目标追踪影响及眼动分析. 天津体育学院学报, 31(4), 358-363. doi: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005- 0000.2016.04.015
doi: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005- 0000.2016.04.015 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005- 0000.2016.04.015
2 胡路明, 吕创, 张学民, 魏柳青 . ( 2018). 身份交换对多身份追踪表现的影响. 心理学报, 50(1), 9-27. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00009
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00009 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.00009
3 胡路明, 苏晶, 魏柳青, 张学民 . ( 2018). 多目标追踪中基于运动信息的分组效应. 心理学报, 50(11), 43-56. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01235
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01235 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.01235
4 姜薇, 丰廷宗, 潘静, 李永娜 . ( 2013). 飞行学员多目标追踪任务加工特点的研究. 航天医学与医学工程, 26(4), 269-273. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2014.08.097
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2014.08.097 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2014.08.097
5 雷寰宇, 魏柳青, 吕创, 张学民, 闫晓倩 . ( 2016). 多身份追踪中基于表情特征的分组效应. 心理学报, 48(2), 141-152. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00141
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00141 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2016.00141
6 李雪佩 . ( 2017). 运动技能水平对多目标追踪能力影响的fMRI研究(硕士学位论文). 上海体育学院.
7 吕馨, 刘景瑶, 魏柳青, 张学民 . ( 2019). 目标数量与运动框架旋转角度对不同场认知风格个体多目标追踪表现的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 24-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041. 2019.00024
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041. 2019.00024 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041. 2019.00024
8 马玉, 张学民, 张盈利, 魏柳青 . ( 2013). 自闭症儿童视觉动态信息的注意加工特点——来自多目标追踪任务的证据. 心理发展与教育, 29(6), 571-577. doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.06.001
doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.06.001 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.06.001
9 王静, 李杰, 张禹 . ( 2018). 足球运动员在动态追踪任务中的追踪表现和注意分配特点. 天津体育学院院报, 33(2), 139-147. doi: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2018.02.007
doi: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2018.02.007 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.2018.02.007
10 魏柳青, 张学民, 刘冰, 鲁学明, 李迎娣 . ( 2010). 多目标视觉追踪的现象、规律和认知加工机制. 心理科学进展, 18(12), 1919-1925.
11 张滨熠, 丁锦红 . ( 2010). 多目标视觉追踪的认知机制. 人类工效学, 16(1), 53-56. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554. 2010.04.033
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554. 2010.04.033 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554. 2010.04.033
12 周成林, 刘微娜 . ( 2010). 竞技比赛过程中认知优势现象的诠释与思考. 体育科学, 30(10), 13-22. doi: 10.3969/j. issn.1000-677X.2010.10.002
doi: 10.3969/j. issn.1000-677X.2010.10.002 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j. issn.1000-677x.2010.10.002
13 Allen R., McGeorge P., Pearson D., & Milne A. B . ( 2004). Attention and expertise in multiple target tracking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 337-347. doi: 10.1002/acp.975
doi: 10.1002/acp.975 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.975
14 Assed M. M., de Carvalho M. K. H. V., de Almeida Rocca C. C., & de Pádua Serafim A., (2016). Memory training and benefits for quality of life in the elderly: A case report. Dementia and Neuropsychologia, 10(2), 152-155. doi: 10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1002012
doi: 10.1590/S1980-5764-2016DN1002012 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1980-5764-2016dn1002012
15 Banducci S. E., Ward N., Gaspar J. G., Schab K. R., Crowell J. A., Kaczmarski H., & Kramer A. F . ( 2015). The effects of cell phone and text message conversations on simulated street crossing. Human Factors, 58(1), 150-162. doi: 10.1177/0018720815609501
doi: 10.1177/0018720815609501 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720815609501
16 Barker K., Allen R., & Mcgeorge P . ( 2010). Multiple-object tracking: Enhanced visuospatial representations as a result of experience. Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 208-214. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/ a000026
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/ a000026 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/ a000026
17 Beaton E. A., Stoddard J., Lai S., Lackey J., Shi J., Ross J. L., & Simon T. J . ( 2010). Atypical functional brain activation during a multiple object tracking task in girls with turner syndrome: Neurocorrelates of reduced spatiotemporal resolution. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115(2), 140-156. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-115.2.140
doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-115.2.140 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.2.140
18 Boot W. R., Kramer A. F., Simons D. J., Fabiani M., & Gratton G . ( 2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychol, 129(3), 387-398. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
19 Brodeur D. A., Trick L. M., Flores H., Marr C., & Burack J. A . ( 2013). Multiple-object tracking among individuals with down syndrome and typically developing children. Development and Psychopathology, 25(2), 545-553. doi: 10.1017/s095457941200123x
doi: 10.1017/s095457941200123x url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095457941200123x
20 Cappa S. F., Benke T., Clarke S., Rossi B., Stemmer B., & van Heugten, C. M . ( 2005). EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: Report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology, 10(1), 11-23 doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331. 2003.00537.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331. 2003.00537.x url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331. 2003.00537.x
21 Casutt G., Martin M., Keller M., & J?ncke L . ( 2014). The relation between performance in on-road driving, cognitive screening and driving simulator in older healthy drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 22(1), 232-244. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.007
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.007 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.007
22 Cavanagh, P., & Alvarez, G. A . ( 2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009
23 Dechurch, L. A., & Mesmer-magnus, J. R . ( 2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017328
doi: 10.1037/a0017328 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
24 Dobrowolski P., Hanusz K., Sobczyk B., Skorko M., & Wiatrow A . ( 2015). Cognitive enhancement in video game players: The role of video game genre. Computers in Human Behavior, 44(44), 59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.051
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.051 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.051
25 D?rum E. S., Aln?s D., Kaufmann T., Richard G., Lund M. J., T?nnesen S., .. Westlye L. T . ( 2016). Age‐related differences in brain network activation and co‐activation during multiple object tracking. Brain and Behavior, 6(11), e00533. doi: 10.1002/brb3.533
doi: 10.1002/brb3.533 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.533
26 Dukic, T., & Broberg, T. ,(2012). Older drivers’ visual search behaviour at intersections. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15(4), 462-470. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.10.001
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.10.001 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.10.001
27 Fabri T. L., Wilson K. E., Holland N., Hickling A., Murphy J., Fait P., & Reed N . (2017). Using a dual-task protocol to investigate motor and cognitive performance in healthy children and youth. Gait and Posture, 54, 154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.002 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.002
28 Faubert, J. (2013). Professional athletes have extraordinary skills for rapidly learning complex and neutral dynamic visual scenes. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1154. doi: 10.1038/ srep01154
doi: 10.1038/ srep01154 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ srep01154
29 Faubert, J., & Sidebottom, L. ( 2012). Perceptual-cognitive training of athletes. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 6(1), 85-102.
30 Franconeri S. L., Jonathan S. V., & Scimeca J. M . ( 2010). Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity. Psychological Science, 21(7), 920-925. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935
doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610373935
31 Green,C. S., & Bavelier, D. ( 2006). Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: The case of action video game players. Cognition, 101(1), 217-245. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition. 2005.10.004
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition. 2005.10.004 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition. 2005.10.004
32 Harenberg S., Mccaffrey R., Butz M., Post D., Howlett J., Dorsch K. D., & Lyster K . ( 2016). Can multiple object tracking predict laparoscopic surgical skills? Journal of Surgical Education, 73(3), 386-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg. 2015.11.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg. 2015.11.013 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg. 2015.11.013
33 Huff M., Papenmeier F., & Zacks J. M . (2012). Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 848-864. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012. 705359
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012. 705359 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2012. 705359
34 Jin, H. J., & Xu,B. H . ( 2015). The effect of fearful expressions on multiple face tracking. Psychologica Belgica, 55(2), 101-117.
35 Junyent L. Q., Blázquez A. P., Fortó J. S. I., & Torradeflot G. C . ( 2015). Perceptual-cognitive training with the neurotracker 3D-MOT to improve performance in three different sports. Educación Física y Deportes, 119(1), 97-108.
36 Legault I., Allard R., & Faubert J . ( 2013). Healthy older observers show equivalent perceptual-cognitive training benefits to young adults for multiple object tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013. 00323
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013. 00323 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013. 00323
37 Legault, I., & Faubert, J. ( 2012). Perceptual-cognitive training improves biological motion perception: Evidence for transferability of training in healthy aging. Neuroreport, 23(8), 469-473. doi: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328353e48a
doi: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328353e48a url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0b013e328353e48a
38 Li J., Oksama L., & Hy?n? J . ( 2016). How facial attractiveness affects sustained attention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57(5), 383-392. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12304
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12304 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12304
39 Li J., Oksama L., & Hy?n? J . ( 2018). Close coupling between eye movements and serial attentional refreshing during multiple-identity tracking. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(5-6), 609-626. doi: 10.1080/20445911. 2018.1476517
doi: 10.1080/20445911. 2018.1476517 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911. 2018.1476517
40 Li J., Oksama L., & Hy?n? J . ( 2019). Model of multiple identity tracking (MOMIT) 2.0: Resolving the serial vs. Parallel controversy in tracking. Cognition, 182, 260-274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.016
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.016 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.016
41 Li J., Oksama L., Nummenmaa L., & Hy?n? J . ( 2018). Angry faces are tracked more easily than neutral faces during multiple identity tracking. Cognition and Emotion, 32(3), 464-479. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1315929
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1315929 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1315929
42 Liu, C. H., & Chen, W. ( 2012). Beauty is better pursued: Effects of attractiveness in multiple-face tracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(3), 553-564. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.624186
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.624186 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.624186
43 Lochner,M. J., & Trick, L. M . ( 2011). Attentional tracking of multiple vehicles in a highway driving scenario. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 27-30 June 2011(pp. 144-150). Olympic Valley - Lake Tahoe, California. Iowa City, IA : Public Policy Center, University of Iowa. doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1390
doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1390 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1390
44 Lochner, M. J., & Trick, L. M . ( 2014). Multiple-object tracking while driving: The multiple-vehicle tracking task. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 76(8), 2326-2345. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0694-3
doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0694-3 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0694-3
45 Lochner, M. J., & Trick, L. M . ( 2015). The effects of task load and vehicle heterogeneity on performance in the multiple-vehicle tracking task. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 22-25 June 2015(pp. 91-97). Salt Lake City, Utah. Iowa City, IA: Public Policy Center, University of Iowa. doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1556
doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1556 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1556
46 Mahncke H. W., Connor B. B., Appelman J., Ahsanuddin O. N., Hardy J. L., Wood R. A., .. Merzenich M. M . ( 2006). Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: A randomized, controlled study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(33), 12523-12528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605194103
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605194103 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605194103
47 Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V . ( 2009). The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(6), 1687-1697. doi: 10.1037/a0016453
doi: 10.1037/a0016453 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016453
48 Mangine G. T., Hoffman J. R., Wells A. J., Gonzalez A., Rogowski J. P., Townsend J. R., .. Stout J. R . ( 2014). Visual tracking speed is related to basketball-specific measures of performance in NBA players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2406-2414. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000550
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000550 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000550
49 Mann D. T. Y., Williams A. M., Ward P., & Janelle C. M . ( 2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(4), 457-478. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.4.457
doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.4.457 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.4.457
50 Martín A., Sfer A. M., D'Urso Villar M. A., & Barraza J. F . ( 2017). Position Affects Performance in Multiple-Object Tracking in Rugby Union Players. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01494
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01494 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01494
51 Memmert D., Simons D. J., & Grimme T . (2009). The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002
52 Michaels J., Chaumillon R., Nguyen-tri D., Watanabe D., Hirsch P., Bellavance F., .. Faubert J . ( 2017). Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups. Plos One, 12(10), e0185909. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0185909
doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0185909 url: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0185909
53 Novack, T. A., & Johnstone, B. ( 1998). Addressing a continuum of recovery after acquired brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Jins, 4(4), 409.
54 Niehorster D., Cornelissen T., Hooge I., & Holmqvist K . ( 2017). Searching with and against each other [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 17(10), 222.
55 Nystr?m M., Niehorster D. C., Cornelissen T., & Garde H . ( 2017). Real-time sharing of gaze data between multiple eye trackers-evaluation, tools, and advice. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1310-1322. doi: 10.3758/s13428- 016-0806-1
doi: 10.3758/s13428- 016-0806-1 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428- 016-0806-1
56 Oei, A. C., & Patterson, M. D . (2013). Enhancing cognition with video games: A multiple game training study. Plos One, 8(3), e58546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058546
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058546 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058546
57 O'Hearn K., Landau B., & Hoffman J. E . ( 2005). Multiple object tracking in people with williams syndrome and in normally developing children. Psychological Science, 16(11), 905-912. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01635.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01635.x url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01635.x
58 Oksama, L., & Hy?n?, J. ( 2004). Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher-order cognition? An individual difference approach. Visual Cognition, 11(5), 631-671. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000473
doi: 10.1080/13506280344000473 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000473
59 Oksama, L., & Hy?n?, J. ( 2008). Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking. Cognitive Psychology, 56(4), 237-283. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.03.001 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.03.001
60 Oslund K. R., Cullen H. M., Kowalski K., & Christie B . ( 2017). Relationship between king devick test, scar3 and 3d mot in cognitive assessment. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51( 11), A9. 2-A10.
61 Parsons B., Magill T., Boucher A., Zhang M., Zogbo K., Bérubé S., .. Faubert J . ( 2014). Enhancing cognitive function using perceptual-cognitive training. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 47(1), 37-47. doi: 10.1177/ 1550059414563746
doi: 10.1177/ 1550059414563746 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1550059414563746
62 Plourde M., Corbeil M. E., & Faubert J . ( 2017). Effect of age and stereopsis on a multiple-object tracking task. Plos One, 12(12):e0188373.
63 Pylyshyn, Z. W . ( 2000). Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 197-207.
64 Pylyshyn, Z. W . ( 2001). Visual indexes, Preconceptual objects, And situated vision. Cognition, 80(1-2), 127-158. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00156-6
doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00156-6 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00156-6
65 Pylyshyn, Z. W . ( 2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11(7), 801-822. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000518
doi: 10.1080/13506280344000518 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280344000518
66 Pylyshyn,Z. W . ( 2006). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets. Visual Cognition, 14(2), 175-198. doi: 10.1080/13506280544000200
doi: 10.1080/13506280544000200 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280544000200
67 Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W . ( 1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179-197. doi: 10.1163/ 156856888x00122
doi: 10.1163/ 156856888x00122 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ 156856888x00122
68 Rahimian P., O'Neal E. E., Zhou S., Plumert J. M., & Kearney J. K . ( 2018). Harnessing vehicle-to-pedestrian (v2p) communication technology: Sending traffic warnings to texting pedestrians. Human Factors, 60(6), 833-843. doi: 10.1177/0018720818781365
doi: 10.1177/0018720818781365 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720818781365
69 Richards E., Bennett P. J., & Sekuler A. B . ( 2006). Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view. Vision Research, 46(25), 4217-4231. doi: 10.1016/j.visres. 2006.08.011
doi: 10.1016/j.visres. 2006.08.011 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres. 2006.08.011
70 Romeas T., Guldner A., & Faubert J . ( 2016). 3D-multiple object tracking training task improves passing decision-making accuracy in soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport. 2015.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport. 2015.06.002 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport. 2015.06.002
71 Romoser M. R. E., Pollatsek A., Fisher D. L., & Williams C. C . ( 2013). Comparing the glance patterns of older versus younger experienced drivers: Scanning for hazards while approaching and entering the intersection. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 16(16), 104-116. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08. 004
doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.08. 004 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.08. 004
72 Scholl B. J., Pylyshyn Z. W., & Feldman J . ( 2001). What is a visual object: Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80(1-2), 159-177. doi: 10.1016/ s0010-0277(00)00157-8
doi: 10.1016/ s0010-0277(00)00157-8 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ s0010-0277(00)00157-8
73 Scimeca,J. M., & Franconeri,S. L . ( 2015). Selecting and tracking multiple objects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), 109-118. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1328
doi: 10.1002/wcs.1328 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1328
74 Thompson T. W., Gabrieli J. D., & Alvarez G. A . ( 2010). Adaptive training in multiple object tracking expands attentional capacity. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 308.
75 Thomas, L. E., & Seiffert, A. E . (2010). Self-motion impairs multiple-object tracking. Cognition, 117(1), 80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.002 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.07.002
76 Thomas, L. E., & Seiffert, A. E . ( 2011). How many objects are you worth? Quantification of the self-motion load on multiple object tracking. Front in Psychology, 2, 245. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00245
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00245 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00245
77 Tinjust D., Allard R., & Faubert J . ( 2008). Impact of stereoscopic vision and 3D representation of visual space on multiple object tracking performance. Journal of Vision, 8(6), 509.
78 Trick L. M., Jaspers-Fayer F., & Sethi N . ( 2005). Multiple-object tracking in children: The “catch the spies” task. Cognitive Development, 20(3), 373-387. doi: 10.1016/j. cogdev. 2005.05.009
doi: 10.1016/j. cogdev. 2005.05.009 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cogdev. 2005.05.009
79 Trick L. M., Hollinsworth H. , & Brodeur, D. A.( 2009) . Multiple- object tracking across the lifespan: Do different factors contribute to diminished performance in different age groups? In D. Dedrick & L. Trick (Eds.), Computation, cognition, and Pylyshyn (pp. 79-99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80 Tullo D., Faubert J., & Bertone A . ( 2015). The limitations of attentional resources across developmental groups: A three-dimensional multiple object tracking study. Journal of Vision, 15(12), 463.
81 Tullo D., Guy J., Faubert J., & Bertone A . ( 2018). Training with a three-dimensional multiple object-tracking (3D-MOT) paradigm improves attention in students with a neurodevelopmental condition: A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 21(6), e12670. doi: 10.1111/desc.12670
doi: 10.1111/desc.12670 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12670
82 VanMarle, K., & Scholl, B. J . ( 2003). Attentive tracking of objects versus substances. Psychological Science, 14(5), 498-504. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.03451
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.03451 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.03451
83 Vartanian O., Coady L., & Blackler K . ( 2016). 3D multiple object tracking boosts working memory span: Implications for cognitive training in military populations. Military Psychology, 28(5), 353-360. doi: 10.1037/mil0000125
doi: 10.1037/mil0000125 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mil0000125
84 Voss M. W., Kramer A. F., Basak C., Prakash R. S., & Roberts B . ( 2010). Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive laboratory? A meta‐analytic review of cognition and sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 812-826. doi: 10.1002/acp.1588
doi: 10.1002/acp.1588 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1588
85 Wahn B., Kingstone A., & K?nig P . ( 2017). Two trackers are better than one: Information about the co-actor's actions and performance scores contribute to the collective benefit in a joint visuospatial task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669
86 Woods-Fry H., Deut S., Collin C. A., Gagnon S., Faubert J., Bédard M., & Marshall S . ( 2017). Three-Dimensional multiple object tracking speed thresholds are associated with measures of simulated driving performance in older drivers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 Annual Meeting, 61(1), 42-45. doi: 10.1177/ 1541931213601505
doi: 10.1177/ 1541931213601505 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1541931213601505
87 Yantis, S. (1992). Multi-element visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 295-340.
88 Zhang X. M., Yan M., & Liao Y. G . ( 2009). Differential performance of chinese volleyball athletes and nonathletes on a multiple-object tracking task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109(3), 747-756. doi: 10.2466/pms.109.3.747-756
doi: 10.2466/pms.109.3.747-756 url: http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.109.3.747-756
[1] CHEN ShengDong,CHEN YongQiang,GAO Wei,LUO Li,YANG JieMin,YUAN JiaJin. The automaticity in cognitive processing: From dichotomy to gradual view[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[2] YUAN Luyi,CHANG Ruosong,MA Jinfei. Why does a driver can not see a critical event on the road?Interaction between “bottom-up” and “top-down” processing mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 557-570.
[3] WANG Shaorui,CHEN Hong. Why trying to lose weight brings fat? Psychological mechanisms and influencing factors of overeating among restrained eaters[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 322-328.
[4] JI Yuzhu,BI Hongyan. The noise exclusion deficit in developmental dyslexia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 201-208.
[5] CHE Jingshang, SUN Hailong, XIAO Chenjie, LI Aimei. Why information overload damages decisions? An explanation based on limited cognitive resources[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1758-1768.
[6] ZHAO Jing. Skills of visual attention span in developmental dyslexia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 20-26.
[7] Yangzhuo LI, Xucheng YANG, Hong GAO, Xiangping GAO. The role of working memory representation in visual search: The perspective of non-target template[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1608-1616.
[8] Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
[9] Heping XIE,Ji PENG,Zongkui ZHOU. Attention guidance and cognitive processing: The educational effects of eye movement modeling examples[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1404-1416.
[10] Yiqi KANG,Xia CHONG,Nan WU. Autism Spectrum Disorders early warning: Occurrence, development and influencing factors of joint attention and empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1223-1231.
[11] ZHANG Kaili, ZHOU Pei, WANG Pei. The affects of facial expression and gaze direction on face processing: Based on perceptual load theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 984-993.
[12] LI Zhenghan, YANG Guochun, NAN Weizhi, LI Qi, LIU Xun. Attentional regulation mechanisms of cognitive control in conflict resolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 966-974.
[13] HUO Lijuan, ZHENG Zhiwei, LI Jin, LI Juan.  The plasticity of aging brain: Evidence from cognitive training[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 846-858.
[14] CHENG Mei, YANG Yan, YIN Huazhan.  Application of transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 657-666.
[15] LIANG Tengfei, WU Haiyan, ZHANG Yin, LONG Fangfang, CHEN Jiangtao, HU Zhonghua, LIU Qiang.  Attentional selection in the perceptual scenes and internal working memory representations: A unitized perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 625-635.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech