Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (8) : 1427-1438     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01427
Regular Articles |
Children’s selective learning in the domain of causal knowledge
CHAI Kaixuan1,2,LI Yilin1,2,ZHU Liqi1()
1 Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Download: PDF(620 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

In the recent years, children’s selective learning has attracted wide-spread attention in the field of cognitive development. Specifically, understanding children’s selective learning in the domain of causal knowledge provides important insights for addressing a classic question in developmental research, namely how children acquire knowledge. Children generally acquire causal knowledge by identifying, evaluating and endorsing information from others. They actively seek explanations from reliable informants, and they select their responses based on the quality of the answers they have received. Since an early age, children can use verbal cues to distinguish explanatory responses from non-explanatory responses. Moreover, when given several explanations, they can tell which one is superior to others based on the structural characteristics of these explanations. Older children can even identify various modes of construal and adopt the appropriate one. Future studies could further investigate the roles of other exploratory characteristics in children’s selective causal learning. Researchers should also further address some controversial issues regarding the cognitive mechanisms of selective casual learning.

Keywords selective learning      causal knowledge      explanation-seeking      explanatory qualities/virtues      modes of construal     
ZTFLH:  B844  
Corresponding Authors: Liqi ZHU     E-mail: zhulq@psych.ac.cn
Issue Date: 25 June 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Kaixuan CHAI
Yilin LI
Liqi ZHU
Cite this article:   
Kaixuan CHAI,Yilin LI,Liqi ZHU. Children’s selective learning in the domain of causal knowledge[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(8): 1427-1438.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01427     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2019/V27/I8/1427
[1] 张耀华, 朱莉琪 . (2014). 认识性信任:学龄前儿童的选择性学习. 心理科学进展, 22( 1), 86-96.
[2] Baldwin D.., &Moses L.J . (1996). The ontogeny of social information gathering. Child Development,67(5), 1915-1939.
[3] Baum L. A., Danovitch J. H., & Keil F. C . (2008). Children's sensitivity to circular explanations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,100(2), 146-155.
[4] Bernard S., Mercier H., & Clément F . (2012). The power of well-connected arguments: Early sensitivity to the connective because. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,111(1), 128-135.
[5] Bonawitz E.., &Lombrozo T., (2012). Occam's rattle: Children's use of simplicity and probability to constrain inference. Developmental Psychology,48(4), 1156-1164.
[6] Bridgers S., Buchsbaum D., Seiver E., Griffiths T. L., & Gopnik A . (2016). Children's causal inferences from conflicting testimony and observations. Developmental Psychology,52(1), 9-18.
[7] Brosseau-Liard P. . (2017). The roots of critical thinking: Selective learning strategies in childhood and their implications. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne,58(3), 263-270.
[8] Buchanan D.., &Sobel D.M . (2011). Mechanism-based causal reasoning in young children. Child Development, 82(6), 2053-2066.
[9] Callanan M.., &Oakes L.M . (1992). Preschoolers' questions and parents' explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development,7(2), 213-233.
[10] Castelain T., Bernard S., & Mercier H . (2018). Evidence that two-year-old children are sensitive to information presented in arguments. Infancy,23(1), 124-135.
[11] Castelain T., Bernard S., Van der Henst J.-B.., & Mercier H . (2016). The influence of power and reason on young Maya children's endorsement of testimony. Developmental Science,19(6), 957-966.
[12] Chin-Parker S. &Bradner A., (2010). Background shifts affect explanatory style: How a pragmatic theory of explanation accounts for background effects in the generation of explanations. Cognitive Processing,11(3), 227-249.
[13] Chouinard M. . (2007). Children's questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,72(1), 1-112.
[14] Cimpian A. &Keil F., (2017). Preface for the special issue on The Process of Explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24(5), 1361-1363.
[15] Coady C. A. J.(1992) . Testimony: A philosophical study Oxford, England: Oxford University Press A philosophical study. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
[16] Corriveau K.., &Kurkul K.E . (2014). "Why does rain fall?": Children prefer to learn from an informant who uses noncircular explanations. Child Development,85(5), 1827-1835.
[17] Csibra G. &Gergely G., (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,13(4), 148-153.
[18] Doebel S., Rowell S. F., & Koenig M. A . (2016). Young children detect and avoid logically inconsistent sources: The importance of communicative context and executive function. Child Development, 87( 6), 1956-1970.
[19] Falcon A. (2015). Aristotle on causality.In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy( Spring 2015 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved Augest 30, 2018, from
url: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/aristotle-causality/
[20] Frazier B. N., Gelman S. A., & Wellman H. M . (2009). Preschoolers' search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development,80(6), 1592-1611.
[21] Frazier B. N., Gelman S. A., & Wellman H. M . (2016). Young children prefer and remember satisfying explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development,17(5), 718-736.
[22] Gelman S. . (2009). Learning from others: Children's construction of concepts. Annual Review of Psychology,60 115-140.
[23] Gelman S. A., Cimpian A., & Roberts S. O . (2018). How deep do we dig? Formal explanations as placeholders for inherent explanations. Cognitive Psychology, 106, 43-59.
[24] Glymour C. (2015). Probability and the explanatory virtues. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,66(3), 591-604.
[25] Gopnik A. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science,337(6102), 1623-1627.
[26] Gopnik A. &Wellman H.M . (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin,138(6), 1085-1108.
[27] Goupil L., Romand-Monnier M., & Kouider S . (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don't know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,113(13), 3492-3496.
[28] Greif M. L., Kemler Nelson D. G., Keil F. C., & Gutierrez F . (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts? Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science,17(6), 455-459.
[29] Harris P. L. (2012).Trusting what you' re told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[30] Harris P. L., Bartz D. T., & Rowe M. L . (2017). Young children communicate their ignorance and ask questions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,114(30), 7884-7891.
[31] Harris P.., &Koenig M.A . (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77( 3), 505-524.
[32] Harris P. L., Koenig M. A., Corriveau K. H., & Jaswal V. K . (2018). Cognitive foundations of learning from testimony. Annual Review of Psychology,69 251-273.
[33] Hermes J., Behne T., & Rakoczy H . (2018). The development of selective trust: Prospects for a dual-process account. Child Development Perspectives, 12( 2), 134-138.
[34] Heyes C. (2017). When does social learning become cultural learning? Developmental Science,20(2), e12350.
[35] Heyes C. &Pearce J.M . (2015). Not-so-social learning strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,282(1802), 20141709.
[36] Hickling A.., &Wellman H.M . (2001). The emergence of children's causal explanations and theories: Evidence from everyday conversation. Developmental Psychology,37(5), 668-683.
[37] Hopkins E. J., Weisberg D. S., &Taylor J. C. V . (2016). The seductive allure is a reductive allure: People prefer scientific explanations that contain logically irrelevant reductive information. Cognition,155 67-76.
[38] Hoppitt W., &Laland K. N .(2013). Social learning:An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models Princeton University Press An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models . Princeton University Press.
[39] Jaswal V. K., Carrington Croft A., Setia A. R., & Cole C. A . (2010). Young children have a specific, highly robust bias to trust testimony. Psychological Science,21(10), 1541-1547.
[40] Johnson S. G. B., Rajeev-Kumar G., & Keil F. C . (2014,July). Inferred evidence in latent scope explanations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the ognitive Science Society, Quebec City,Canada.
[41] Johnson S. G. B., Rajeev-Kumar G., & Keil F. C . (2016). Sense-making under ignorance. Cognitive Psychology,89 39-70.
[42] Johnston A. M., Johnson S. G. B., Koven M. L., & Keil F. C . (2017). Little Bayesians or little Einsteins? Probability and explanatory virtue in children's inferences. Developmental Science,20(6), e12483.
[43] Johnston A. M., Sheskin M., Johnson S. G. B., & Keil F. C . (2018). Preferences for explanation generality develop early in biology but not physics. Child Development,89(4), 1110-1119.
[44] Keil F. . (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology.In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology Vol. 25. Modularity and constraints in language and cognition(pp. 103-138). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[45] Keil F. C. ( 1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Symposia of the Fyssen Foundation.Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 234-267) . New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
[46] Keil F. . (2006). Explanation and understanding. Annual Review of Psychology,57 227-254.
[47] Kelemen D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology,35(6), 1440-1452.
[48] Kelemen D., Callanan M. A., Casler K., & Pérez-Granados D. R . (2005). Why things happen: Teleological explanation in parent-child conversations. Developmental Psychology,41(1), 251-264.
[49] Kendal R. L., Boogert N. J., Rendell L., Laland K. N., Webster M., & Jones P. L . (2018). Social learning strategies: Bridge-building between fields. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,22(7), 651-665.
[50] Khemlani S. S., Sussman A. B., & Oppenheimer D. M . (2011). Harry Potter and the sorcerer's scope: Latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning. Memory & Cognition,39(3), 527-535.
[51] Koenig M.., &Sabbagh M.A . (2013). Selective social learning: New perspectives on learning from others. Developmental Psychology,49(3), 399-403.
[52] Kurkul K.., &Corriveau K.H . (2018). Question, explanation, follow-up: A mechanism for learning from others? Child Development,89(1), 280-294.
[53] Kushnir T., Vredenburgh C., & Schneider L. A . (2013). "Who can help me fix this toy?" The distinction between causal knowledge and word knowledge guides preschoolers' selective requests for information. Developmental Psychology,49(3), 446-453.
[54] Lane J.., &Harris P.L . (2015). The roles of intuition and informants' expertise in children's epistemic trust. Child Development,86(3), 919-926.
[55] Legare C. . (2017). Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114( 30), 7877-7883.
[56] Legare C.., &Harris P.L . (2016). The ontogeny of cultural learning. Child Development,87(3), 633-642.
[57] Lipton P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
[58] Lombrozo T. (2006). The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,10(10), 464-470.
[59] Lombrozo T. (2007). Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology,55(3), 232-257.
[60] Lombrozo T. (2010). Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology,61(4), 303-332.
[61] Lombrozo T(2012).Explanation and abductive inference. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 260-276). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
[62] Lombrozo T. (2016). Explanatory preferences shape learning and inference. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,20(10), 748-759.
[63] Lombrozo T., Bonawitz E. B., & Scalise N. R . (2018). Young children's learning and generalization of teleological and mechanistic explanations. Journal of Cognition and Development,19(2), 220-232.
[64] Lombrozo T. &Gwynne N.Z . (2014). Explanation and inference: Mechanistic and functional explanations guide property generalization. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 700.
[65] Lombrozo T., &Vasilyeva N .(2017). Causal explanation. In M. Waldmann (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 415-432). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
[66] Lombrozo T., &Wilkenfeld D. ,(2018). Mechanistic versus functional understanding. In S. R. Grimm (Ed.),Varieties of understanding:New perspectives from philosophy, psychology, and theology . New York,NY: Oxford University Press.
[67] Lucas C. G., Bridgers S., Griffiths T. L., & Gopnik A . (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition,131(2), 284-299.
[68] Luce M.., &Hsi S., (2015). Science-relevant curiosity expression and interest in science: An exploratory study. Science Education,99(1), 70-97.
[69] McCormack T., Frosch C., Patrick F., & Lagnado D . (2015). Temporal and statistical information in causal structure learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 395-416.
[70] Mercier H., Bernard S., & Clément F . (2014). Early sensitivity to arguments: How preschoolers weight circular arguments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,125 102-109.
[71] Mills C. M., &Landrum A. R ,(2014).Inquiring minds:Using questions to gather information from others In E Robinson & S Einav (Eds), Trust and skepticism: Children’s selective learning from testimony (pp 63-76) East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Using questions to gather information from others. In E. Robinson & S. Einav (Eds.), Trust and skepticism: Children’s selective learning from testimony (pp. 63-76).East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
[72] Mills C. M., Legare C. H., Grant M. G., & Landrum A. R . (2011). Determining who to question, what to ask, and how much information to ask for: The development of inquiry in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,110(4), 539-560.
[73] Muentener P. &Schulz L., (2014). Toddlers infer unobserved causes for spontaneous events. Frontiers in Psychology,5 1496.
[74] Pacer M. &Lombrozo T., (2017). Ockham's razor cuts to the root: Simplicity in causal explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,146(12), 1761-1780.
[75] Piaget J. (1929). The child’s concept of the world.London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
[76] Poulin-Dubois D. &Brosseau-Liard P., (2016). The developmental origins of selective social learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science,25(1), 60-64.
[77] Prasada S. (2017). The scope of formal explanation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24(5), 1478-1487.
[78] Prasada S. &Dillingham E.M . (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition,99(1), 73-112.
[79] Rogoff B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., Vol.2, pp.679-744). New York: Wiley.
[80] Ronfard S., Bartz D. T., Cheng L., Chen X., & Harris P. L . (2018). Children's developing ideas about knowledge and its acquisition. Advances in Child Development and Behavior,54 123-151.
[81] Ronfard S., Chen E. E., & Harris P. L . (2018). The emergence of the empirical stance: Children's testing of counterintuitive claims. Developmental Psychology,54(3), 482-493.
[82] Ronfard S., Zambrana I. M., Hermansen T. K., & Kelemen D . (2018). Question-asking in childhood: A review of the literature and a framework for understanding its development. Developmental Review,49 101-120.
[83] Ruggeri A. &Lombrozo T., (2015). Children adapt their questions to achieve efficient search. Cognition,143 203-216.
[84] Ruggeri A., Lombrozo T., Griffiths T. L., & Xu F . (2016). Sources of developmental change in the efficiency of information search. Developmental Psychology,52(12), 2159-2173.
[85] Salmon W. C. ( 1989). Four decades of scientific explanation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
[86] Sánchez Tapia I., Gelman S. A., Hollander M. A., Manczak E. M., Mannheim B., & Escalante C . (2016). Development of teleological explanations in Peruvian Quechua-speaking and U.S. English-speaking preschoolers and adults. Child Development,87(3), 747-758.
[87] Schachner A., Zhu L., Li J., & Kelemen D . (2017). Is the bias for function-based explanations culturally universal? Children from China endorse teleological explanations of natural phenomena. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 157, 29-48.
[88] Schulz L. (2012). The origins of inquiry: Inductive inference and exploration in early childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,16(7), 382-389.
[89] Sobel D.., &Kushnir T., (2013). Knowledge matters: How children evaluate the reliability of testimony as a process of rational inference. Psychological Review,120(4), 779-797.
[90] Sosa E, (1991).Testimony and coherence. In E. Sosa (Ed.),Knowledge in Perspective:Selected Essays in Epistemology (pp. 215-222).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[91] Stahl A.., &Feigenson L., (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration. Science,348(6230), 91-94.
[92] Sutherland S.., &Cimpian A., (2018). Developmental evidence for a link between the inherence bias in explanation and psychological essentialism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177, 265-281.
[93] Tomasello M. (2016). Cultural learning redux. Child Development,87(3), 643-653.
[94] &Fraassen B, . C.(1980) .The scientific image. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[95] van Leeuwen, E. J. C. Cohen., Collier-Baker E., Rapold C. J., Schafer M., Schütte S., &Haun D. B. M .,(2018). The development of human social learning across seven societies. Nature Communication,9(1), 2076.
[96] Vanderbilt K. E., Heyman G. D., & Liu D . (2014). In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants. Developmental Science, 17( 3), 443-451.
[97] Vasilyeva N., Wilkenfeld D., & Lombrozo T . (2015,July). Goals affect the perceived quality of explanations Goals affect the perceived quality of explanations.Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Pasadena,CA.
[98] Vygotsky L. . (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
[99] Walker C. M., Bonawitz E., & Lombrozo T . (2017). Effects of explaining on children's preference for simpler hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24(5), 1538-1547.
[100] Weisberg D. S., Keil F. C., Goodstein J., Rawson E., & Gray J. R . (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,20(3), 470-477.
[101] Weisberg D. S., Taylor J. C. V., & Hopkins E. J . (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgment and Decision Making,10(5), 429-441.
[102] Zemla J. C., Sloman S., Bechlivanidis C., & Lagnado D. A . (2017). Evaluating everyday explanations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,24(5), 1488-1500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech