Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (7) : 1268-1274     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01268
Regular Articles |
Social class signs and their effects on interpersonal social interactions
GUO Rong,FU Xinyuan()
Department of Psychology at School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
Download: PDF(586 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Social class signs are a component of person perception about social class of others. People can determine another’s social class by processing these subtle social class signs, and another’s social class has a profound and extensive impact on interpersonal social interaction. This article used personal attire, facial features, and speaking characteristics as examples to illustrate that social class signs affect individual’s judgment of another’s social class. Moreover, we summarized the distinguishing influences of social class signs on interpersonal social interactions based on the perspectives of social exchange, social fairness, and social identity. It would be desirable to study if the functions of some social class signs are weakened because of the problem of conspicuous consumption. Regarding the relatively high relevance between social class signs and social class, it is necessary to explore the relation and distinction between these two constructs in future research. Given that few studies have examined the impacts of social class signs of a third party on interpersonal social interactions, it is important to expand the research from the interpersonal perspective to the third-party perspective.

Keywords social class signs      interpersonal social interactions      social exchange      social fairness      social identity     
ZTFLH:  B849: C91.61  
Corresponding Authors: Xinyuan FU     E-mail: fuxinyuan@cufe.edu.cn
Issue Date: 22 May 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Rong GUO
Xinyuan FU
Cite this article:   
Rong GUO,Xinyuan FU. Social class signs and their effects on interpersonal social interactions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1268-1274.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01268     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2019/V27/I7/1268
[1] 程淑华, 李欣, 韩毅初 . (2017). 群际接触对外群体信任的影响:内群体认同的中介效应. 心理学探新, 37(1), 54-58.
[2] 蔡頠, 吴嵩, 寇彧 . (2016). 权力对亲社会行为的影响:机制及相关因素. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 120-132.
url: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/article3427.shtml
[3] 郭永玉, 杨沈龙, 李静, 胡小勇 . (2015). 社会阶层心理学视角下的公平研究. 心理科学进展, 23(8), 1299-1311.
url: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/article3329.shtml
[4] 杭斌, 修磊 . (2016). 收入不平等、信贷约束与家庭消费. 统计研究, 33(8), 73-79.
[5] 胡荣, 陈斯诗 . (2008). 时尚消费的符号意义与社会阶层建构. 社会科学研究, (6), 110-114.
[6] 李春玲 . (2017). “中产化”:中国社会阶层结构变化新趋势. 人民论坛, (22), 1-1.
[7] 陆学艺 . (2002). 当代中国社会阶层研究报告. 社会科学文献出版社.
[8] 王春晓, 朱虹 . (2016). 地位焦虑、物质主义与炫耀性消费——中国人物质主义倾向的现状、前因及后果. 北京社会科学, (5), 31-40.
[9] 徐凤娇 . (2016). 亲社会行为的阶层差异:施与受的双重视角(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学.
[10] 郑杭生 . (2002). 我国社会阶层结构新变化的几个问题. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(4), 5-9.
[11] 郑杭生 . (2005). 透视当代社会结构促进中国社会和谐. 中国人民大学学报, 19(2), 1-8.
[12] Abbate C. S., Ruggieri S., & Boca S . (2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(5), 619-622.
[13] Bar-Anan Y., Trope Y., Liberman N., & Algom D . (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610-622.
[14] Bergeron A. P., & Zanna M. P . (1973). Group membership and belief similarity as determinants of interpersonal attraction in Peru. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 397-411.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002202217300400402
[15] Bjornsdottir R. T., & Rule N. O . (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 530-546.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pspa0000091
[16] Cao Y., Yu H., Wu Y., & Zhou X . (2015). Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1411-1421.
[17] Cappelen A. W., Eichele T., Hugdahl K., Specht K., Sørensen E. Ø., & Tungodden B . (2014). Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(43), 15368-15372.
[18] Clingingsmith D., & Sheremeta R. M . (2018). Status and the demand for visible goods: Experimental evidence on conspicuous consumption. Experimental Economics, 21(4), 877-904.
[19] DeCelles K. A., & Norton M. I . (2016). Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(20), 5588-5591.
[20] Diener E., & Biswas-Diener R. , (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being?. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119-169.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1014411319119
[21] Evans J. S . (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278.
[22] Fussell P . (1983). Class: A guide through the American status system. New York: Summit Books.
[23] Giles H., & Sassoon C. , (1983). The effect of speaker's accent, social class background and message style on British listeners' social judgements. Language & Communication, 3(3), 305-313.
url: http://dx.doi.org/age
[24] Gillath O., Bahns A. J., Ge F., & Crandall C. S . (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 423-430.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092656612000608
[25] Haslam S. A . (2014). Making good theory practical: Five lessons for an applied social identity approach to challenges of organizational, health, and clinical psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 1-20.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjso.12061
[26] Haushofer J., & Fehr E. , (2014). On the psychology of poverty. Science, 344(6186), 862-867.
url: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.1232491
[27] Kraus M. W., & Keltner D. , (2009). Signs of socioeconomic status: A thin-slicing approach. Psychological Science, 20(1), 99-106.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02251.x
[28] Kraus M. W., & Mendes W. B . (2014). Sartorial symbols of social class elicit class-consistent behavioral and physiological responses: A dyadic approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2330-2340.
[29] Kraus M. W., & Stephens N. M . (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 642-656.
url: http://dx.doi.org/l
[30] Kraus M. W., Horberg E. J., Goetz J. L., & Keltner D . (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1376-1388.
[31] Kraus M. W., Park J. W., & Tan J. J. X ., (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422-435.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691616673192
[32] Kuppens T., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R., Spruyt B., & Easterbrook M. J . (2018). Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 429-447.
[33] Leventhal G. S. .(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
[34] Makkar M. (2014). Luxury for oneself or luxury for others? Exploring the underlying emotions behind inconspicuous luxury consumption (Doctoral dissertation). Auckland University of Technology.
[35] Malatesta C. Z., Fiore M. J., & Messina J. J . (1987). Affect, personality, and facial expressive characteristics of older people. Psychology & Aging, 2(1), 64-69.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ology
[36] Manstead A. S. R . (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267-292.
[37] Navarro-Carrillo G., Valor-Segura I., & Moya M . (2018). Do you trust strangers, close acquaintances, and members of your ingroup? Differences in trust based on social class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135(2), 585-597.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-016-1527-7
[38] Rivera L. A. (2016). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[39] Rivera L. A., & Tilcsik A. , (2016). Class advantage, commitment penalty: The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1097-1131.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122416668154
[40] Schilke O., Reimann M., & Cook K. S . (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(42), 12950-12955.
[41] Thomas K. A., de Freitas J., DeScioli P., & Pinker S . (2016). Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 621-629.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000153
[42] van Doesum N. J., Tybur J. M., & van Lange P. A. M ., (2017). Class impressions: Higher social class elicits lower prosociality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103116303365
[1] Lei YAN,Bin ZUO,Yanhong ZHANG,Yang WU,Linchuan YANG. Cross-categorization and its influence on stereotyping[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1272-1283.
[2] Xinyue WANG,Xingchao WANG,Li LEI,Pengcheng WANG,Hao ZHOU. The role of Social Networking Sites’ using in social identity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2024-2034.
[3] DUAN Jinyun, XU Yue, YU Linhan. Theory of self-cultivation extracted from Confucianism: A reflection and supplement to social exchange paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(10): 1890-1900.
[4] TAN Chenhao; WANG Yibo; CUI Yichen; WANG Pei. The profit sacrificing tendency of reputation-profit game[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1907-1916.
[5] GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong; LI Jing; HU Xiaoyong. Social Fairness Researches in Perspectives of Social Class Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1299-1311.
[6] LIU Zhe; LIANG Juan; LIU Yanjun; MA Hongyu; LIU Tengfei; MA Lulu; YANG Linchuan. Theoretical Basis and Influential Factors of Leaders’ Adherence to Fairness Rules[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1258-1266.
[7] WANG Caiyu. The Connotation, Mechanism and Effects of Self-Brand Connections[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 922-933.
[8] XIN Sufei;MING Lang;XIN Ziqiang. Increasing Intergroup Trust: The Approaches of Social Identity and Intergroup Contact[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 290-299.
[9] WU Baopei;ZHU Xiaoqin;CHANG Lei. Cheater-Detection from Lens of Evolutionary Psychology: Accuracy and Modularity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2224-2234.
[10] GAO Cheng-Hai;HOU Ling;LV Chao;WAN Ming-Gang. Implicit Theories and Group Relation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1180-1188.
[11] LI Jian;LI Yi-Ming. Trade-off in Love: To Maintain or Restore Psychological Equity in the Process of Give and Take Among Romantic Partners[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 598-607.
[12] XIN Su-Fei;XIN Zi-Qiang. Social Identity Complexity: Theories, Methods and Advances[J]. , 2012, 20(3): 433-442.
[13] ZOU Wen-Chi;TIAN Qing;LIU Jia. [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1879-1888.
[14] CHEN Hao;XUE Ting;YUE Guo-An. Instrumentality, Social Identity, and Group-based Anger: Overview of Collective Action Research[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 127-136.
[15] ZOU Wen-Chi1;LIU Jia. “One for All, All for One”: Review of Research on Team-Member Exchange[J]. , 2011, 19(8): 1193-1204.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech