Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (6) : 1019-1024     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01019
Research Reports |
Descriptive norms promote willingness to voluntarily donate blood rather than actual blood donation
XIE Kai-Jie1,2,MA Jia-Tao1,HE Quan3,JIANG Cheng-Ming1()
1 School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
2 College of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
3 School of Politics and Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
Download: PDF(514 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

The term descriptive norms refers to the influence of most peoples’ practices on the attitudes and behaviors of others. This study attempted to use descriptive norms to promote the willingness of participants to donate blood voluntarily and engage in other blood-donation behaviors. The study consisted of two similar experiments. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of descriptive norms on blood donation and found that descriptive norms increased participants’ willingness to donate blood, but not their actual donation of blood. Given the results of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 was designed to increase blood-donation activity by sending participants “short message service” reminders. However, Experiment 2 also found no increase in the participants’ blood-donation activity. These two experiments consistently demonstrated that descriptive norms promoted participants’ willingness to donate blood voluntarily but did not promote their actual donation of blood. The paper discusses possible reasons for these results.

Keywords nudge      voluntary blood donation      descriptive norms      short message services     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Corresponding Authors: Cheng-Ming JIANG     E-mail:
Issue Date: 22 April 2019
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Kai-Jie XIE
Jia-Tao MA
Quan HE
Cheng-Ming JIANG
Cite this article:   
Kai-Jie XIE,Jia-Tao MA,Quan HE, et al. Descriptive norms promote willingness to voluntarily donate blood rather than actual blood donation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1019-1024.
URL:     OR
1 刘长秋 . ( 2016). 权利献血, 还是义务献血?——兼论我国献血法的修改完善. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), ( 3), 92-99.
2 唐河山, 冯子阳, 牟显尧, 吴春燕, 王子, 钱宝华 . ( 2017). 采血车无偿献血者献血认知及动机分析. 中国输血杂志, 30( 7), 799-800.
3 王良燕, 韩冰, 叶子 . ( 2016). 基于自我建构的社会规范中西差异化研究. 系统管理学报, 25( 3), 395-404.
4 韦庆旺, 孙健敏 . ( 2013). 对环保行为的心理学解读——规范焦点理论述评. 心理科学进展, 21( 4), 751-760.
5 殷群 . ( 2013). 我国无偿献血现状、问题及对策研究 (硕士学位论文). 苏州大学.
6 张红涛, 王二平 . ( 2007). 态度与行为关系研究现状及发展趋势. 心理科学进展, 15( 1), 163-168.
7 Akhu-Zaheya, L. M., & Shiyab, W. E. Y . ( 2017). The effect of short message system (SMS) reminder on adherence to a healthy diet, medication, and cessation of smoking among adult patients with cardiovascular diseases. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 98, 65-75.
8 Benartzi S., Beshears J., Milkman K. L., Sunstein C. R., Thaler R. H., Shankar M., .. Galing S . ( 2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28( 8), 1-15.
pmid: 5549818 url:
9 Brewer N. T., Chapman G. B., Rothman A. J., Leask J., & Kempe A . ( 2017). Increasing vaccination: Putting psychological science into action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18( 3), 149-207.
10 Cialdini R. B., Kallgren C. A., & Reno R. R . ( 1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24( 1), 201-234.
11 Cialdini R. C., Reno R. R., & Kallgren C. A . ( 1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
12 Eom K., Kim H. S., Sherman D. K., & Ishii K . ( 2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27( 10), 1331-1339.
pmid: 27565535 url:
13 Glynn S. A., Kleinman S. H., Schreiber G. B., Zuck T., Combs S. M., Bethel J., .. Williams A. E . ( 2010). Motivations to donate blood: Demographic comparisons. Transfusion, 42( 2), 216-225.
pmid: 11896338 url:
14 Goldstein N. J., Cialdini R. B., & Griskevicius V . ( 2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 3), 472-482.
15 Halpern, D. ( 2015). The Rise of Psychology in Policy: The UK's de facto council of psychological science advisers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10( 6), 768-771.
16 Khonsari S., Subramanian P., Chinna K., Latif L. A., Ling L. W., & Gholami O . ( 2015). Effect of a reminder system using an automated short message service on medication adherence following acute coronary syndrome. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 14( 2), 170-179.
pmid: 24491349 url:
17 Kormos C., Gifford R., & Brown E . ( 2014). The influence of descriptive social norm information on sustainable transportation behavior: A field experiment. Environment & Behavior, 47( 5), 479-501.
18 Lapinski, M. K., & Rimal, R. N . ( 2010). An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15( 2), 127-147.
19 Mellström, C., & Johannesson, M . ( 2008). Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6( 4), 845-863.
20 Nolan J. M., Schultz P. W., Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., & Griskevicius V . ( 2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 7), 913-923.
21 Oborne, D. J., & Bradley, S . ( 1975). Blood donor and nondonor motivation: A transnational replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60( 3), 409-410.
pmid: 1194172 url:
22 Rimal R. N., Lapinski M. K., Cook R. J., & Real K . ( 2005). Moving toward a theory of normative influences: How perceived benefits and similarity moderate the impact of descriptive norms on behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 10( 5), 433-450.
pmid: 16199387 url:
23 Rimal, R. N., & Real, K . ( 2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32( 3), 389-414.
24 Savani K., Wadhwa M., Uchida Y., Ding Y., & Naidu, N. V. R . ( 2015). When norms loom larger than the self: Susceptibility of preference-choice consistency to normative influence across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 70-79.
25 Schultz P. W., Nolan J. M., Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., & Griskevicius V . ( 2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18( 5), 429-434.
pmid: 17576283 url:
26 Szaszi B., Palinkas A., Palfi B., Szollosi A., & Aczel B . ( 2017). A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: Toward understanding when and why nudges work. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31( 3), 335-366.
27 Thaler R. H., & Sunstein, C. R .( 2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28 Vinnell L. J., Milfont T. L., & McClure J . ( 2018). Do social norms affect support for earthquake-strengthening legislation? Comparing the effects of descriptive and injunctive Norms. Environment and Behavior, https: //
29 World Health Organization ( 2017. Global status report on blood safety and availability 2016. Retrieved 2017 from
[1] ZHAO Xiaoying, LI Aimei, WANG Haixia. Nudging goal attainment: The motivating effects of temporal landmarks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1275-1283.
[2] ZHANG Shuwei,LIANG Xinyi,YUE Jinglun. Behavioral social policy: Nudge in the practice and exploration of public welfare[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 429-438.
[3] LIU Huan,SUI Xiao-Yang,HUANG Yuan-Na,LIN Rong-Ping,XU Ming-Xing. The nudging role of behavioral economics in retirement savings decisions: Current situation and future prospects[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 418-428.
[4] LIU Pei,FENG Yidan,LI Aimei,LIU Wei,XIE Jianfei. Disclosing behavioral anomalies in economic management: Implications for mental accounting theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 406-417.
[5] LIU Yongfang,FAN Wenjian,HOU Rixia. From theory, research, to applications: Richard H. Thaler and his contributions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 381-393.
[6] WANG Caiyu; LEI Li. The Connotation, Mechanism and Corporate Response of Social Responsible Consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1245-1257.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech