Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (1) : 141-148     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00141
Regular Articles |
The characteristics, dimensions and psychological effect of social categorization
ZUO Bin1,WEN Fangfang1(),SONG Jingjing2,DAI Taotao1
1 School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2 Institute of Applied Psychology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430070, China
Download: PDF(532 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

Social categorization is a subjective process in which an individual classifies others into groups based on perceived similarities. Social categories are often automatic, flexible and multifaceted, including dimensions of both natural cues (such as gender, age and race) and social cues (such as language, occupation and social status). In such multidimensional social categories (e.g., “rich old celibate bachelor”), some of the constituent categorical dimensions contribute disproportionately to the traits attributed to the category overall. This is termed the “dominant dimension effect,” and is influenced by the valence of the dimensions. Different dimensions will also interact with each other, resulting in a cross-categorization effect. We review these effects in the context of social categorization, and highly important questions that remain for social psychologists interested in processing mechanism of social categorization from the perspective of observer, actor and social situation.

Keywords social categorization      psychological characteristics      dimensions of cues      dominant dimension effect      cross categorization     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Issue Date: 23 November 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Fangfang WEN
Jingjing SONG
Taotao DAI
Cite this article:   
Bin ZUO,Fangfang WEN,Jingjing SONG, et al. The characteristics, dimensions and psychological effect of social categorization[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 141-148.
URL:     OR
1 侯志瑾, 梁湘明 . (2005). Gottfredson的职业抱负发展理论简介与研究评述. 心理科学进展,13(2), 201-210.
2 黎情, 佐斌, 胡聚平 . (2009). 群体交叉分类效应的代数模型及其潜在加工过程. 心理科学进展,17(4), 863-869.
3 辛自强, 辛素飞 . (2014). 被信任者社会身份复杂性对其可信性的影响. 心理学报,46(3), 415-426.
4 张凯莉, 张琴, 周静, 王沛 . (2017). 面孔识别过程中多重社会亚范畴的交互作用. 心理科学进展,25(11), 1955-1963.
5 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤 . (2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38(4), 1019-1023.
6 Bar-Haim Y., Ziv T., Lamy D., & Hodes R . (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17(2), 159-163.
pmid: 16466424 url:
7 Baron A.S., &Banaji M.R . (2006). The development of implicit attitudes. evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science,17(1), 53-58.
pmid: 16371144 url:
8 Bjornsdottir R.T., &Rule N.O . (2017). The visibility of social class from facial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(4), 1-17.
pmid: 28557470 url:
9 Bodenhausen G. V., Kang S. K., & Peery D . (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.),The SAGE handbook of social cognition (pp. 311-329). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
url: Fiske
10 Correll J., Park B., Judd C. M., Wittenbrink B., Sadler M. S., & Keesee T . (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police offers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006-1023.
11 Crisp R.J., & Hewstone M. (2007). Multiple social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 163-254.
12 Crisp R.J., &Turner R.N . (2010). Have confidence in contact. American Psychologist, 65(2), 133-135.
13 Deaux K. . (2012). Categories we live by. In S. Wiley, G. Philogène, & T. A. Revenson (Eds.),(2012). Social categories in everyday experience.,
14 Diesendruck G., Goldfein‐Elbaz R., Rhodes M., Gelman S., & Neumark N . (2013). Cross‐cultural differences in children's beliefs about the objectivity of social categories. Child Development, 84(6), 1906-1917.
pmid: 3714352 url:
15 Donders N. C., Correll J., & Wittenbrink B . (2008). Danger stereotypes predict racially biased attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1328-1333.
16 Dovidio J. F., Love A., Schellhaas F. M., & Hewstone M . (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 606-620.
url: Processes
17 Dragojevic M., Berglund C., & Blauvelt T. K . (2017). Figuring out who’s who: The role of social categorization in the language attitudes process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(1), 28-50.
18 Efferson C., Lalive R., & Fehr E . (2008). The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897), 1844-1849.
pmid: 18818361 url:
19 Eidson R.C., &Coley J.D . (2014). Not so fast: Reassessing gender essentialism in young adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 382-392.
20 Freeman, J. B. & Ambady N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of persons construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247-279.
pmid: 21355661 url:
21 Ghaziani A., Taylor V., & Stone A . (2016). Cycles of sameness and difference in LGBT social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 165-183.
22 Gillespie A., Howarth C. S., & Cornish F . (2012). Four problems for researchers using social categories. Culture & Psychology, 18(3), 391-402.
23 Hampton J.A . (1987). Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 55-71.
24 Hogg M. A., Abrams D., & Brewer M. B . (2017). Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 570-581
url: Processes
25 Horwitz S. R., Shutts K., & Olson K. R . (2014). Social class differences produce social group preferences. Developmental Science, 17(6), 991-1002.
pmid: 24702971 url:
26 Kang S.K., &Chasteen A.L . (2009). Beyond the double- jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1281-1285.
27 Kang S. K., Chasteen A. L., Cadieux J., Cary L. A., & Syeda M . (2014). Comparing young and older adults’ perceptions of conflicting stereotypes and multiply- categorizable individuals. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 469-481.
pmid: 25244468 url:
28 Kawakami K., Amodio D. M., & Hugenberg K . (2017). Chapter one - Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 41-48.
29 Kinzler K.D., &Spelke E.S . (2011). Do infants show social preferences for people differing in race? Cognition, 119(1), 1-9.
pmid: 3081609 url:
30 Kinzler K. D., Shutts K., & Correll J . (2010). Priorities in social categories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 581-592.
31 Kinzler K. D., Shutts K., DeJesus J., & Spelke E. S . (2009). Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623-634.
pmid: 21603154 url:
32 Klapper A., Dotsch R., van Rooij I., & Wigboldus D . (2017). Four meanings of “categorization”: A conceptual analysis of research on person perception. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12336.
33 Labov, W. (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed.), New York: Cambridge University Press.
34 Locke K.D., & Heller S. (2017). Communal and agentic interpersonal and intergroup motives predict preferences for status versus power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 71-86.
pmid: 28903646 url:
35 Nicolas G., de la Fuente M., & Fiske S. T . (2017). Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: A review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 621-631.
url: Processes
36 Nosek B. A., Greenwald A. G. , & Banaji, M. R.(2007) . The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review In J A Bargh (Ed), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of mental processes (pp 265-292) New York: Psychology Press A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of mental processes (pp. 265-292) . New York: Psychology Press.
37 Pedulla D.S . (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 75-94.
38 Philogène G. . (2012). Understanding social categories: An epistemological journey. In S. Wiley, G. Philogène, T. A. Revenson,(Eds).
39 Prati F., Crisp R. J., & Rubini M . (2015). Counter- stereotypes reduce emotional intergroup bias by eliciting surprise in the face of unexpected category combinations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 31-43.
40 Rozendal K. . (2003). The effects of choice over category membership on social category compound dominance (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of. California.
41 Rule N.O., &Sutherland S.L . (2017). Social categorization from faces: Evidence from obvious and ambiguous groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(3), 231-236.
42 Shutts K. . (2015). Young children's preferences: Gender, race, and social status. Child Development Perspectives, 9(4), 262-266.
43 Shutts K., Brey E. L., Dornbusch L. A., Slywotzky N., & Olson K. R . (2016). Children use wealth cues to evaluate others. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0149360.
pmid: 4774995 url:
44 Shutts K., Roben C. K. P., & Spelke E. S . (2013). Children's use of social categories in thinking about people and social relationships. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(1), 35-62.
pmid: 23646000 url:
45 Smyth K., Feeney A., Eidson R. C., & Coley J. D . (2017). Development of essentialist thinking about religion categories in Northern Ireland (and the United States). Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 475-496.
pmid: 28230403 url:
46 Smallman R., & Becker B. (2017). Motivational differences in seeking out evaluative categorization information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 1020-1032.
pmid: 28903700 url:
47 Song J., & Zuo B. (2016). Functional significance of conflicting age and wealth cross-categorization: The dominant role of categories that violate stereotypical expectations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1624.
pmid: 27818640 url:
48 Weisman K., Johnson M. V., & Shutts K . (2015). Young children’s automatic encoding of social categories. Developmental Science, 18(6), 1036-1043.
pmid: 4476957 url:
49 Williams D. R., Priest N., & Anderson N. B . (2016). Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: Patterns and prospects. Health Psychology, 35(4), 407-411.
pmid: 27018733 url:
[1] DANG Baobao;GAO Chenghai;YANG Yang;WAN Minggang. Intergroup Threat: The Contributing Factors and Reduction Strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 711-720.
[2] ZHANG Xiao-Bin;ZUO Bin;XUE Meng-Jie;JIANG Wen;HOU Fei-Xiang. The Real-time Measurement of the Process of Person Construal Based on Mouse-tracking Technology[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 770-781.
[3] SHI Wen-Wen;WANG Bin;MA Hong-Yu;LUO Xiao-Bing;CAI Yu-Xuan. Psychological and Behavioral Characteristics of Problem Gamblers[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 592-597.
[4] ZUO Bin;ZHANG Xiao-Bin. The Neural Mechanisms of Category Learning and Application[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 843-852.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech